Back
to top
Shouldnt this be manslaughter not murder?
Watch this threadPage 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
matthewduncan
Badges:
12
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#1
Heres the low down.
Three guys
![Name: image.jpg
Views: 103
Size: 66.1 KB]()
got a call that some other guys they have beef with have been spotted in the local vicinity so they decide to tool up and go shoot at them.
Unfortunately they hit the wrong person.
A sexy honey that goes by the name of sabrina moss. (most of you probably heard about this story)
![Name: image.jpg
Views: 116
Size: 89.4 KB]()
All three have literally just been sentenced to 37 years behind bars and its got me thinking.
Shouldn't this have been considered manslaughter?
Three guys
got a call that some other guys they have beef with have been spotted in the local vicinity so they decide to tool up and go shoot at them.
Unfortunately they hit the wrong person.
A sexy honey that goes by the name of sabrina moss. (most of you probably heard about this story)
All three have literally just been sentenced to 37 years behind bars and its got me thinking.
Shouldn't this have been considered manslaughter?
1
reply
Scienceisgood
Badges:
21
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#2
Report
#2
So, they go out with the intent to murder and actually kill someone, and this is manslaughter?
Last time I checked, manslaughter involved the ACCIDENTAL death of a person (not a specific person) which could have possibly been avoided.
Am I not right in assuming?
This is murder, the victim was just unlucky.
Last time I checked, manslaughter involved the ACCIDENTAL death of a person (not a specific person) which could have possibly been avoided.
Am I not right in assuming?
This is murder, the victim was just unlucky.
0
reply
Caedus
Badges:
15
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#3
Report
#3
(Original post by Scienceisgood)
So, they go out with the intent to murder and actually kill someone, and this is manslaughter?
Last time I checked, manslaughter involved the ACCIDENTAL death of a person (not a specific person) which could have possibly been avoided.
Am I not right in assuming?
This is murder, the victim was just unlucky.
So, they go out with the intent to murder and actually kill someone, and this is manslaughter?
Last time I checked, manslaughter involved the ACCIDENTAL death of a person (not a specific person) which could have possibly been avoided.
Am I not right in assuming?
This is murder, the victim was just unlucky.
0
reply
Scienceisgood
Badges:
21
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#4
Report
#4
(Original post by Caedus)
As there was no intent to murder the victim, and the victim died as a result of a reckless act, I would call it manslaughter.
As there was no intent to murder the victim, and the victim died as a result of a reckless act, I would call it manslaughter.
That's like saying there are twins you go out to murder twin A and end up murdering twin B.
Should the crime be lesser for a case of mistaken identity?
0
reply
Caedus
Badges:
15
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#5
Report
#5
(Original post by Scienceisgood)
This is still murder, but just a case of mistaken identity.
That's like saying there are twins you go out to murder twin A and end up murdering twin B.
Should the crime be lesser for a case of mistaken identity?
This is still murder, but just a case of mistaken identity.
That's like saying there are twins you go out to murder twin A and end up murdering twin B.
Should the crime be lesser for a case of mistaken identity?
0
reply
Scienceisgood
Badges:
21
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#6
Report
#6
(Original post by Caedus)
Wait a minute, I thought the girl died in the crossfire? If that's so, it's manslaughter.
Wait a minute, I thought the girl died in the crossfire? If that's so, it's manslaughter.
Then yes, it is manslaughter technically.
0
reply
manchesterunited15
Badges:
0
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#7
Waka Flocka
Badges:
15
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#8
Report
#8
0
reply
Old_Simon
Badges:
12
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#9
Report
#9
A killing which takes during the commission of a felony - in this case the conspiracy and attempt to murder a third party - is murder.
0
reply
Caedus
Badges:
15
Rep:
?
You'll earn badges for being active around the site. Rep gems come when your posts are rated by other community members.
#10
Report
#10
(Original post by Scienceisgood)
I haven't heard this case before (or if I have, probably forgot about it/skimmed it), but, if that's the case.
Then yes, it is manslaughter technically.
I haven't heard this case before (or if I have, probably forgot about it/skimmed it), but, if that's the case.
Then yes, it is manslaughter technically.
0
reply
X
Page 1 of 1
Go to first unread
Skip to page:
Quick Reply
