The Student Room Group

The Liverpool FC Thread XII

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Lúcio
i was actually giving a sly dig to united....:cool:


damn i got rekt
Original post by Adnan Januzaj
dat small team attitude
preparing for a defeat against Swansea


http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/football/28718345
Original post by Adnan Januzaj
damn i got rekt




rekd by me and mysterious lord.
not a good day fagio, not a good day at all...
Original post by New Slaves
I watched him in games and read reviews. He dropped off considerably for a lot of the season. His stats were mediocre or worse, and even then boosted by set pieces. Being one of Almeria's 'stand out' players doesn't mean anything either.

More potential than Coutinho? Never.


Of course he dropped off, he's only young. But he showed more than enough to be given a chance.
Thought Suso got more involved than Borini
Original post by CB91
Of course he dropped off, he's only young. But he showed more than enough to be given a chance.


I agree.
He doesn't have better potential than coutinho - that lad could be a world beater if he improved his shooting and general presence in a game.

But I've always had high hopes for suso.
Maybe he won't quote make it, but just because he got 14 PL apps a few years ago, he shouldn't be given a chance at all now?

I know it was only an isolated match against championship opposition but in the brief time he was on the field, suso was infinitely more effective than Borini would have ever been.
(edited 9 years ago)
Borini is terrible but tbh putting him in for a tough game like west ham does no favours especially when the main fault was the midfield behind him getting dominated and outnumbered, there's nothing borini can do about that, you then find yourselves 2-0 down early on, again not his fault but the fault of the midfield and defence. You have Henderson marking a west ham CB ffs. You don't put on Sakho and have Skrtel who's known for his defensive lapses on set pieces...

All I need to say was that Balotelli was pretty ineffective vs West Ham and Villa but isn't getting as much stick as Borini.

As a backup option he's fine, not many teams can boast having Lambert and Borini as backup options, I'd take it over Arsenals backup options anyway. Lambert offers 15 goals when fit, Borini works hard and can give you 5-10 goals off the bench.

Suso is in a position when there's many players who play in his role. Buying Markovic for big money has pretty much ended Suso's career, at least you could have seen a future for him on the wing but he's a bench option when people are injured at the very best with the cup appearances as a starter.
Original post by jam278
Borini is terrible but tbh putting him in for a tough game like west ham does no favours especially when the main fault was the midfield behind him getting dominated and outnumbered, there's nothing borini can do about that, you then find yourselves 2-0 down early on, again not his fault but the fault of the midfield and defence. You have Henderson marking a west ham CB ffs. You don't put on Sakho and have Skrtel who's known for his defensive lapses on set pieces...

All I need to say was that Balotelli was pretty ineffective vs West Ham and Villa but isn't getting as much stick as Borini.

As a backup option he's fine, not many teams can boast having Lambert and Borini as backup options, I'd take it over Arsenals backup options anyway. Lambert offers 15 goals when fit, Borini works hard and can give you 5-10 goals off the bench.

Suso is in a position when there's many players who play in his role. Buying Markovic for big money has pretty much ended Suso's career, at least you could have seen a future for him on the wing but he's a bench option when people are injured at the very best with the cup appearances as a starter.


true, borini has had little chance since our chance creation has been bloody awful.
but even so he is a bad, bad player.
i think the difference with balotelli is that he has only just joined the club so fans are gonna give him time to get adjusted and more leeway with "meh" performances.

conceding so stupidly from set pieces makes me so angry though; pretty sure that's what everton will target; try to get as many corners as they can and they'll always have a chance.

looking at it now, we haven't seen much of markovic but benfica must be laughing their pants off at £20m.
the lad is only 20 so he has loads of time to improve, but i would have much rather us spent a little more on a more established player instead of doing what we always do and buying potential.
on another note, i've seen the official fifa 15 ratings.

pretty shocked henderson is only 78, especially when you look paulinho 80 and fellaini 79.
if we signed cazorla and mertesacker from arsenal, they would be our two best players.:rolleyes:

it's only a game but things like that just make me laugh.
Original post by Lúcio
mertesacker from arsenal,



Mertesacker would no doubt be your best defender
Reply 2991
So Sturridge still not back in training. Looks like he won't make the derby. Not good.
Original post by AR_95
Mertesacker would no doubt be your best defender


first of all that's a dubious statement at best.

secondly i never mentioned defenders; this is just the hilarious notion that mertesacker would be liverpool's joint #1 player with sturridge or that cazorla is undisputedly better than any player we have...

Original post by Pn94
So Sturridge still not back in training. Looks like he won't make the derby. Not good.


never thought he would tbh
do you think he'll be back for wednesday away to basel?
or do you think rodgers would be careful and save him for next saturday at home to west brom?
Original post by Lúcio
first of all that's a dubious statement at best.

secondly i never mentioned defenders; this is just the hilarious notion that mertesacker would be liverpool's joint #1 player with sturridge or that cazorla is undisputedly better than any player we have...



never thought he would tbh
do you think he'll be back for wednesday away to basel?
or do you think rodgers would be careful and save him for next saturday at home to west brom?



But it's just fifa..

Anyway, which defender in your squad do you think is above merte and why?
Original post by AR_95
But it's just fifa..

Anyway, which defender in your squad do you think is above merte and why?


Original post by Lúcio
it's only a game but things like that just make me laugh.


yep, covered that already mate...

don't get me wrong, mertesacker is quality aerially and positionally but his ridiculous lack of pace puts him way down in my eyes - sterling would run rings around him.
not saying we have better defenders but you were saying it with such certainty as if mertesacker would come in to our team and instantly we'd be solid.

if he's as good as you claim, why is your defence a load of bumbling idiots?
no offence, not like i can talk.
(edited 9 years ago)
Reply 2995
Lovren is clearly a better player than Mertesacker. Mertesacker is a classic case of Arsenal fans massively overestimating the quality of their players.
Original post by Lúcio
yep, covered that already mate...

don't get me wrong, mertesacker is quality aerially and positionally but his ridiculous lack of pace puts him way down in my eyes - sterling would run rings around him.
not saying we have better defenders but you were saying it with such certainty as if mertesacker would come in to our team and instantly we'd be solid.

if he's as good as you claim, why is your defence a load of bumbling idiots?
no offence, not like i can talk.


There's more to a defender than just pace though. Anways all I said was " he's no doubt better than the defenders you have" so you're putting words in my mouth by saying I said he'd make your defence solid.

There's a difference between our defensive issues and your defensive issues. Man for man I'd say our defenders come out on top (taking into consideration individual quality and etc). What makes ours look so shaky is the amount of times our CB's push up so far and play a high line even when we've constantly been left exposed. When we set up shop we're actually very solid and there aren't as many mistakes as people make out to be, or compared to what I've seen of Liverpool's defence (albeit not so much so this season so I haven't really made much criticism of it my self).

Anyways, I wasn't really here to make a point about which defence is stronger, I just made the point that Mertesacker is better individually than the defenders you have. Our defence has been awful compared to how solid it was last season although conceding 1 goal to Leicester compared to 5 from UTD should tell you enough..
Original post by AR_95
There's more to a defender than just pace though. Anways all I said was " he's no doubt better than the defenders you have" so you're putting words in my mouth by saying I said he'd make your defence solid.

There's a difference between our defensive issues and your defensive issues. Man for man I'd say our defenders come out on top (taking into consideration individual quality and etc). What makes ours look so shaky is the amount of times our CB's push up so far and play a high line even when we've constantly been left exposed. When we set up shop we're actually very solid and there aren't as many mistakes as people make out to be, or compared to what I've seen of Liverpool's defence (albeit not so much so this season so I haven't really made much criticism of it my self).

Anyways, I wasn't really here to make a point about which defence is stronger, I just made the point that Mertesacker is better individually than the defenders you have. Our defence has been awful compared to how solid it was last season although conceding 1 goal to Leicester compared to 5 from UTD should tell you enough..


oh of course there is, but don't underestimate the importance of it in modern football.

true, your defensive lapses are a great deal to do with your past it manager.
in a way though you're kind of like us - on paper you have decent quality defenders and we actually do too (believe it or not)
man for man i wouldn't say you have significantly better defenders, but as a combined unit right now you're superior.

meh, i'm not bothered about comparing defences.
honestly i found the cazorla thing funnier than the mertesacker thing.
a guy who barely gets in to your starting XI is deemed superior to the likes of sturridge and gerrard (albeit playing in a different position)
EA have outdone themself yet again:cool:
Original post by mhsc
Lovren is clearly a better player than Mertesacker. Mertesacker is a classic case of Arsenal fans massively overestimating the quality of their players.


This, he has the turning circle of a lorry. All last season they were going on about how they had one of the best defences in the league, then they moan when they don't sign a WC centre-back.
Original post by Lúcio
oh of course there is, but don't underestimate the importance of it in modern football.

true, your defensive lapses are a great deal to do with your past it manager.
in a way though you're kind of like us - on paper you have decent quality defenders and we actually do too (believe it or not)
man for man i wouldn't say you have significantly better defenders, but as a combined unit right now you're superior.

meh, i'm not bothered about comparing defences.
honestly i found the cazorla thing funnier than the mertesacker thing.
a guy who barely gets in to your starting XI is deemed superior to the likes of sturridge and gerrard (albeit playing in a different position)
EA have outdone themself yet again:cool:


Cazorla gets into our starting XI very often, and if he doesn't it's because he's replaced by either Alexis , ozil or Ramsey with the new formation.

Quick Reply

Latest