Original post by bertstare
Yet get upset over porn, lads mags, or anything that displays women in a sexual manner?
Define "cheap sluts"?
I do not see anyone as a "cheap slut" as a woman's (and man's) value is not determined by their sexuality or sexual behaviour.
I also do not care about porn or lads mags.
I also do not care about porn or lads mags.
If they get paid for it, they are victims of the objectifying, commodifying patriarchy.
If they give it up for free, they are making empowered choices as womyn.
If they give it up for free, they are making empowered choices as womyn.
Original post by thesabbath
If they get paid for it, they are victims of the objectifying, commodifying patriarchy.
If they give it up for free, they are making empowered choices as womyn.
If they give it up for free, they are making empowered choices as womyn.
Exactly
Original post by 6Jesus6Christ6
Wrong. If a girl ain't gonna suck the holy cock, then her value goes down instantly.
Consider, who has more value to men in general: Amy Brooke (pornstar ho) or Christine Lagard (head of IMF, many others could do her job)
Consider, who has more value to men in general: Amy Brooke (pornstar ho) or Christine Lagard (head of IMF, many others could do her job)
Women do not exist solely to be of value to men.
You disgust me.
Original post by 6Jesus6Christ6
Wrong. If a girl ain't gonna suck the holy cock, then her value goes down instantly.
Consider, who has more value to men in general: Amy Brooke (pornstar ho) or Christine Lagard (head of IMF, many others could do her job)
Consider, who has more value to men in general: Amy Brooke (pornstar ho) or Christine Lagard (head of IMF, many others could do her job)
Many others could also do Brooke's job..........
Original post by SophieSmall
Women do not exist solely to be of value to men.
You disgust me.
You disgust me.
No, but, let's be honest, everyone is defined by their value to you, that is human nature. So if you're a man literally all women are defined by their value to you, as are all but one man.
Original post by SophieSmall
Women do not exist solely to be of value to men.
You disgust me.
You disgust me.
Well while I agree with your first statement, I am sorry to see the existence of the second.
To back myself up however, we can agree on this objective truth: some people have more value than others. It is my belief that the way a woman can raise her value to men (and women too, since jealousy is a form of acknowledgement of superiority) is through cultivating her sex appeal.
Of course one's value is entirely subjective, therefore not all people believe that one's sexiness holds value. But given the undeveloped nature of modern humans, I will hold my position on the matter.
Why do both genders have to be separated like its a war is a better question
Posted from TSR Mobile
Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Yeah dude
This. It really pisses me off.
I support women having the choice to do things they want to do. If that's have casual sex, fine. If that's be a pornstar, fine. There's equally nothing wrong with the people who view such material as long as it's all above board and consensual.
Original post by SophieSmall
This. It really pisses me off.
Same with race, religion etc. if we weren't fighting for worthless stuff we could be making the earth environmentally better, instead we just yell at eachother because of what gender we are, what nationality we are, religion etc.
Posted from TSR Mobile
Feminists support women, period. They can more or less do as they wish and their behaviour will be condoned as an empowered act of liberation from the patriarchy or male oppression.
Frankly I'm tired of feminism and wish we could abolish it and enforce equalism instead. Once we stop drawing on all these gender separations, we can start to explore true equality between the sexes. Yes we have biological distinctions, but they aren't the problem. These socially constructed gender separations are what's driving the conflict between the sexes.
Frankly I'm tired of feminism and wish we could abolish it and enforce equalism instead. Once we stop drawing on all these gender separations, we can start to explore true equality between the sexes. Yes we have biological distinctions, but they aren't the problem. These socially constructed gender separations are what's driving the conflict between the sexes.
Quick Reply
Latest
Trending
Last reply 1 day ago
Why is the political left now censorious and authoritarian??Last reply 2 days ago
Is it true that British unis are prejudiced towards degrees from Scottish unis?Last reply 2 days ago
If the Russell Group was now a fair representation of what it still claims to beLast reply 2 weeks ago
TSR Goes Green: How important will the environment be in this year's election?Last reply 2 weeks ago
Research Rankings of universities if you add Research Quality & Intensity percentagesLast reply 1 month ago
Is University of Birmingham prestigious and respected well enough in UK ?Trending
Last reply 1 day ago
Why is the political left now censorious and authoritarian??Last reply 2 days ago
Is it true that British unis are prejudiced towards degrees from Scottish unis?Last reply 2 days ago
If the Russell Group was now a fair representation of what it still claims to beLast reply 2 weeks ago
TSR Goes Green: How important will the environment be in this year's election?Last reply 2 weeks ago
Research Rankings of universities if you add Research Quality & Intensity percentagesLast reply 1 month ago
Is University of Birmingham prestigious and respected well enough in UK ?
