The Student Room Group
Uni students - Complete our survey >>
Uni students - Complete our survey >>
Uni students - Complete our survey >>

Anyone hear about the new porn bans?

Scroll to see replies

Reply 40
Avatar for miser
miser
20
I agree with some of them, but spanking? Female ejaculation?
Last time i tried it got stuck so i welcome these changes in policy.
Original post by InnerTemple
Maybe female ejaculation is there because of the whole water sports thing being banned too?


The maybe they should ban male facial ejaculation too, you know in case the woman drowns. :facepalm:
Original post by SophieSmall
The maybe they should ban male facial ejaculation too, you know in case the woman drowns. :facepalm:


And sex in adventurous positions. Lest we have strained muscles.
Original post by InnerTemple
And sex in adventurous positions. Lest we have strained muscles.


Do you know what let's just ban sex all together in case the women get pregnant and die during child birth. :rolleyes:
Reply 45
Avatar for Comus
Comus
10
SophieSmall

Penetration by any object "associated with violence"


What precisely does this mean? It could potentially refer to something innocuous or a mere portrayal but if its banning the penetration with an object that may cause significant harm to the performer then I can understand the reasoning behind it.
Original post by BestProfileName
Maybe we just shouldn't do these at home - do them in public.


Exactly, then there's someone watching to make sure you're not on the verge of death.

Original post by Zander01
I really don't understand why female ejaculation is there... Is it incase the guy drownes?


Original post by SophieSmall
Yeah that must be it :')


What on earth are they going to do about it though, try and fit all males with armbands and a snorkel? This is so ridiculous!
Original post by Comus
What precisely does this mean? It could potentially refer to something innocuous or a mere portrayal but if its banning the penetration with an object that may cause significant harm to the performer then I can understand the reasoning behind it.


I have absolutely no idea. It's plain laughable and pathetic.
Original post by abbiemac
Exactly, then there's someone watching to make sure you're not on the verge of death.





What on earth are they going to do about it though, try and fit all males with armbands and a snorkel? This is so ridiculous!


Wait is that not normal? I'd best tell the fella.
(edited 9 years ago)
Original post by Comus
What precisely does this mean? It could potentially refer to something innocuous or a mere portrayal but if its banning the penetration with an object that may cause significant harm to the performer then I can understand the reasoning behind it.


You haven't seen sword sex then?

Some people love it. I've never seen the point.
The pornhub network is american.

Chill out guys.
Reply 51
Avatar for Comus
Comus
10
Original post by SophieSmall
I have absolutely no idea. It's plain laughable and pathetic.


I agree, I haven't seen the amendment but it seems as though its been very sloppily written.
Original post by InnerTemple
You haven't seen sword sex then?

Some people love it. I've never seen the point.

Um....no, please enlighten me? (I'd rather not google)
Original post by SophieSmall
Wait is that normal? I'd best tell the fella.


Yeah, didn't you know? Apparently, if you're not drowning in it, you're not doing it right.
Reply 53
Avatar for Mimir
Mimir
20
An interesting regulation. I can see the logic, since DVDs are regulated by these BBFC guidelines, there's no reason that UK streaming shouldn't be.

Plenty of places to see what you like, sourced from around the world - it's UK only.
Reply 54
Avatar for sdotd
sdotd
17
stupid country

anyway more production will go to america anyway which means less investment here but production will always find somewhere else so banning is stupid
Ban what you like. Impossible to enforce. If a ban can't be enforced, just ignore it.
Original post by Genocidal
Ban what you like. Impossible to enforce. If a ban can't be enforced, just ignore it.


I think a production ban would be easier to enforce than, say, a ban on allowing to be viewed.
Original post by InnerTemple
I think a production ban would be easier to enforce than, say, a ban on allowing to be viewed.


Hardly. How are you going to stop porn being made in any old house anywhere? It's not like these people are all renting professional studios. Porn is unique in that it can be made anywhere with ease. Close the curtains and just try to prove it was produced in Britain.
Well this is ****ing ridiculous.

I don't even watch any of that stuff but to each their own.

WTF is up with the female ejaculation one though? And face sitting? I don't really understand this? In fact if this was in April I would assume this was an April fool's post.
Original post by futbol
This is only UK-produced porn. The best produce it in the US so it's not a huge issue.


But.. But fake taxi

Quick Reply

Related discussions

Latest

Trending

Trending

Articles for you