Can a man ever forgive a woman for aborting his child?

Not in the slightest.

The male recipient owns 50 percent of the baby by aborting the child in spite of her partner's wishes the woman is exercising her right to be selfish and self-involved.

The woman is the container she can't eject the child without consulting the other party that have an active interest in the holdings of that container.

That is 9 months, as opposed to a literal lifetime of parenthood. I obviously don't think women should be legally or medically denied abortions, but the father is not unreasonable if he feels that he can't forgive someone for aborting his child.

The male recipient owns 50 percent of the baby by aborting the child in spite of her partner's wishes the woman is exercising her right to be selfish and self-involved.

The woman is the container she can't eject the child without consulting the other party that have an active interest in the holdings of that container.

And forcing your partner to endure pregnancy and childbirth in spite of their wishes isn't being selfish and self involved?

The male recipient owns 50 percent of the baby by aborting the child in spite of her partner's wishes the woman is exercising her right to be selfish and self-involved.

The woman is the container she can't eject the child without consulting the other party that have an active interest in the holdings of that container.

So tell me why you wrote 'men can be so amusing'? Any normal person would've wrote 'people can be so amusing', unless of course that person had an irrational hate towards a certain group of people and had a sad, pathetic agenda they wanted to spread. What if I wrote 'black people can be so amusing' or 'gay people can be so amusing', what would you say then?

Do you realise how misogynistic you're being? You claim men own women's bodies when they're in relationships, and now you call women 'containers'. Pretty outrageous comments really.

Funnily enough though, I agree that men deserve a big say in any issue of abortion. The idea of having my child terminated without my consent or without having even been consulted is quite sickening to me. With that said, in a situation of deadlock, the woman should probably have the ultimate say as she is the one who has to carry the baby after all. I would just go separate ways from her after that kind of disagreement most likely.

If a woman decides she doesn't want a baby, she can abort it without the husband's permission. And yet, if the man doesn't want the child, he will be forced to pay child support, because, they say, it takes two people to make a baby. Which is true. And men shouldn't be allowed to abandon their responsibilities. However, the same is true for the woman. She shouldn't be allowed to abandon her responsibilities of caring for the human who is alive. It takes two to make a baby, and the man should have an equal say in whether or not the child is aborted, because it is his child too. He can't force a woman to get an abortion, and she shouldn't force him to have his child aborted.

For those who say that men should have no say, then I say that men shouldn't have to pay child support. If abortion is a woman's way out of her responsibility, then men should be allowed to simply leave, to get out of their responsibility.

Agreed. But I still don't think that a man leaving a pregnant woman is right. Maybe if it was intended to be a short term thing and she wanted to keep the baby, but if they were in a legitimate relationship and he got scared because she got knocked up that's a dick move.

If a woman decides she doesn't want a baby, she can abort it without the husband's permission. And yet, if the man doesn't want the child, he will be forced to pay child support, because, they say, it takes two people to make a baby. Which is true. And men shouldn't be allowed to abandon their responsibilities. However, the same is true for the woman. She shouldn't be allowed to abandon her responsibilities of caring for the human who is alive. It takes two to make a baby, and the man should have an equal say in whether or not the child is aborted, because it is his child too. He can't force a woman to get an abortion, and she shouldn't force him to have his child aborted.

For those who say that men should have no say, then I say that men shouldn't have to pay child support. If abortion is a woman's way out of her responsibility, then men should be allowed to simply leave, to get out of their responsibility.

From any point of view - you can't say that it's really the same for a man as it is for a woman for multiple reasons. The man isn't going to feel the physical effect of child birth nor carrying the baby for 9 months (it probably won't halt his career as well). Also, the man could potentially leave before the child is born, while the woman doesn't have that choice (he could ask her to keep the child, he could leave when it's too late to get an abortion, she would be stuck with a child that she didn't want but he did)

You really do have to take these things into consideration instead of saying it's a 50/50 split.

But, honestly, it would probably be better for couples to talk through these things beforehand so they are on the same page (before it's too late to do so).

You're even more amusing.

I know it can't happen this way, but if you area woman who has been trying for a baby and you get pregnant.
Imagine your joy. Now imagine he has the power to end the babies life without your say so, and does so, because it isn't the right time in his career. Do you think you could forgive him?

Not really comparable, since the man would have to do something to the woman's body to abort the baby, almost certainly with side-effects.

Plus his career wouldn't necessarily have to be affected. Most men want to take time off for their baby, but women pretty much have to.