Deadly gun attack in Paris: Global reactions & discussion

Which terrorist are those?

IRA
Lord resistance army
Crusaders
Nazis
Burmese monks
...

And which of those committed terrorist attacks in 2013?

The excuse that somebody was worse is not a justification to what these extremist groups are doing.

Burmese

So the Burmese make up 0.007% of the world population and they are responsible for 0.0006% of the global terrorist attacks.

See that is disproportionate to what we see with the Islamic groups.

But that still does not excuse the fact that so called islamic groups are not the only ones comitted attacks and that it is not an Islamic problem it is a problem within the country, taliban is not an Islamic problem it is a Pakistani and Afghanistani problem. Just like the ira are a Irish problem and not a Christian problem
Blaming islam as the root cause of terrorism is like blaming christianity for colonialism

Posted from TSR Mobile

But that still does not excuse the fact that so called islamic groups are not the only ones comitted attacks and that it is not an Islamic problem it is a problem within the country, taliban is not an Islamic problem it is a Pakistani and Afghanistani problem. Just like the ira are a Irish problem and not a Christian problem
Blaming islam as the root cause of terrorism is like blaming christianity for colonialism

Posted from TSR Mobile

Frances history of treating Maghrebian and Africans like **** is similar to how the british treated pretty much every brown nation and how the Arabs treated the Africans.

Its been a ticking time bomb for centuries.Just look at those stupid stupid cartoons.

IMO this is all directly linked to the British/EU/US/Western/including israeli racist foreign policy of imperialism

ISIS and their minions are all directly linked to such action.

Muslims and the European West have been going at it for 1000 years, nothings changed

both lying through their teeth its about religion or 'liberal freedoms' like the people in this thread banging on about "freedom of speech" when its just about political dominance for power.

you have both left a trail of destruction wherever you lay your heads.

just find an island and fight it out so the rest of us can live in peace

Don't want to high-jack the thread. But IS are Muslims. They believe in Allah and the Prophet Muhammad. They consider their leader to be the successor of Muhammad.

To say they aren't is just intellectual dishonesty.

Hey there. Just to correct you there have been no successors of Muhammad and there never will be.

Apparently the gunmen were French.

centuries of people living in the caliphates back in the day would disagree

Hey there. Just to correct you there have been no successors of Muhammad and there never will be. They are extreme. They take innocent lives. That is why a lot of Muslims do not want to be associated with them.

I heard it too. A lot of eyewitness accounts said that the gun men were fluently speaking French and only chanted one word 'Allah Akbar'. The word that everyone associates with terrorism. The word in fact is v. irrelevant and is used wrongly in this case.

Whats the freedom squads reason for continiously antaginsing because its "their right" to do so?

he probably meant the nxt Caliph, who majority islamic world believe wre to rule after mohammed

It's now official.

There are different types of Muslims like there are different types of Christians. Maybe they would.

It's also v. suspicious if you ask me. Politics is a dirty business.

The so-called "successor" is a nutter. There has never been a successor of Prophet Muhammad (SAW) and there never will be.