No.
I used to force myself to believe in a God as recently as last October due to Pascal's Wager but then I came across a user called 'The Epicurean' who rather impressively deconstructed the arguments for God.
By the way, does this destroy the Euthyphro dilemma?
1) Let A be 'this action is good'
Let B be 'God commands it'
2) In the Euthyphro dilemma we must choose between A->B or B->A
3)A-> B (this action is good, therefore God commands it) then logically ¬B->¬A (if God doesn't command it, this action is not good)
4) B-> A (God commands it, therefore this action is good) then logically ¬A->¬B (if this action is not good, then God doesn't command it)
Technically, isn't B-> A the better choice as ¬A->¬B sounds better than ¬B->¬A (since I can think of things that are considered good but is not not commanded by God 3000 years ago in the Bible)?