The Top 10 UK Universities

I don't know, is why I billed it 'my supposition'. It seems plausibly likely that a higher percentage of King's grads find employment in London than do Warwick grads. I'd be frankly astonished to find that it was otherwise.



you're aware that six sevenths of the population live and work outside London?

I don't doubt either circumstance as the case. As much as I'm wondering is what the read off is from this to the quality of the institution. There are variables to be allowed for and they should be if ours is a nuanced discussion and isn't punch and judy. One of these will be London salaries. Another, though, will be the fact that the single largest school at King's is the nursing school, which circumstance will bear positively on employment rates and perhaps negatively on starting salaries.

Yes, the nurses should actually be a negative drag on KCL's average salary, like they are on its average entry grades since they require lower entry grades and make up a majority of the university.

There is one non-geographical factor. 21.8% of KCL leavers are classed as medical, dentistry or veterinary leavers. That is the highest proportion apart from Imperial, RVC and St George's. The equivalent figure for Warwick is 5.7%.


Posted from TSR Mobile

Where did you get the data from?

Relatively high starting salary, no unpaid internships.

Obviously it varies by subject. But, in your opinion, what are the top 10 universities in the UK, overall? (Re: prestige/job prospects/everything).

Manchester
cam
ox
lse
ic
ucl
kcl
edin
warwick
bristollllll



Posted from TSR Mobile

I am sure unpaid internships are not part of the list of "graduate-level" jobs in the statistics.

The Nursing starting salary is £21,388. The average graduate training scheme salary is £26,500.

It is above (national) median.

https://www.hesa.ac.uk/images/stories/hesa/Pubs_Intro_Graphics/DLHE_1213/DLHE_1213_table_K.xlsx

It is above (national) median.

https://www.hesa.ac.uk/images/stories/hesa/Pubs_Intro_Graphics/DLHE_1213/DLHE_1213_table_K.xlsx

Why don't you explain why KCL is not superior?



How?

It's a waste of time because you obviously don't listen to what people on here tell you.

Hows Brighton and SOAS as universities? I've chosen geography with evs for undergrad. I wanted to know out of SOAS and Durham, which is better

Posted from TSR Mobile

For Chemistry:

1/Cambridge
2/Oxford
3/Bristol

A waste of time or you don't have anything logical to say because all the stats state the obvious?

Are you sure, when I was on a trip there they were saying, that there main competitors were Oxford and Cambridge and that Bristol doesn't get the recognition it deserves for Chemistry and you need rediculously high grades to do it there more like Cambridge

What are you talking about? All the relevant stats would point to Warwick's supremacy over King's. The:
The Complete University Guide
University League Tables
Guardian University Guide
The Sunday Times University Guide

are all saying that Warwick is the superior university to King's. These are credible ranking bodies which would all confirm that Warwick is the better, superior university. The gap isn't even close. Go check them out yourself. These are highly verifiable data that can be accessed through their respective websites.

Even when you compare the two institutions on a subject-per-subject basis. King's couldn't hold on its own against Warwick. The average ranking of Warwick across all major fields that it offers is 6. King's is hovering around 22. Boy, that's a huge gap!

For 2015 ranking, for example, Warwick is placed at number 7. Do you know where's king's? It's way down at #28. Again, that's a significant gap that separates between the two. If you don't believe me, here's the link to the ranking:
http://www.thecompleteuniversityguide.co.uk/league-tables/rankings

But then again, like I've said in the past, you don't listen to what people here tell you. I'm sure you'd disregard this just as you did to other data that would have helped you understand and accept the reality.