I'm Muslim but I've realised I'm definitely bisexual...

I must confess, I was paraphrasing Richard Dawkins

Oh dear. If you actually compared Dawkins' quote with mine, you'd notice that I've omitted the descriptions that do not apply to Allahn.

Allahn Akbar!

Oh because you definitely know that don't you? You've died and come back alive to tell us that heaven and hell isn't real, right?

Genocidal? Ethnic-Cleanser? Racist? Etc etc
Doesn't seem like you did give it much thought at all

The Quran hasn't changed a single word since it was written

Anyways, if he believes in Islam, he should repent, if not then this thread is pointless; there is no need for me, you or anyone else to convince him what to believe.

Of course. Allahn repeatedly boasts about how He ****ed up many cities and communtities in history. Allahn proudly cites the examples of the people of Lut, Nuh, Hud, etc repeatedly throughout the Qur'an, as a warning to present and future communities.

Allahn the racist prefers the Arabs and Israrelites over all people. Allahn the racist constantly portrays the colour black in a negative manner ("...their faces will be blackened on the Day...", "...kill the black dogs...", "...black women in dreams are a sign of plague...", etc).

You're right, it hasn't. So where have all these cocky "new" denominations of religion come from? Christianity as well has a ridiculous number of sub-sections that chose to invent themselves.

If they could... chap, you can too. I am sure there's already a Muslim community of sexually liberated people.

Of course. Allahn repeatedly boasts about how He ****ed up many cities and communtities in history. Allahn proudly cites the examples of the people of Lut, Nuh, Hud, etc repeatedly throughout the Qur'an, as a warning to present and future communities.

Allahn the racist prefers the Arabs and Israrelites over all people. Allahn the racist constantly portrays the colour black in a negative manner ("...their faces will be blackened on the Day...", "...kill the black dogs...", "...black women in dreams are a sign of plague...", etc).

Hardly ethnic-cleaning, since they aren't being 'cleansed' because of their ethnicity. They were punished with calamities because they rejected their messengers who came with clear signs.

Hardly racist when He has said that the Arabs are not superior over anyone else... if you look at it, 'Israel' is another name for Jacob (I think it was Jacob) and thus the Israelites are the people who followed Jacob. The Israelites are thus the believers, not necessarily a racial group, so simply Allah favours those who believe over those who disbelieve
Oh hogwash, you know that the use of black isn't being used in a racist manner, it's just basic usage of imagery in language, like how we use 'dark' and 'black' in a negative way sometimes in English without being racist. Haven't heard the black woman thing or black dog thing, you'll have to clarify that for me (genuinely)

Just curious, is there any actual sound reasoning behind prohibiting homosexual relationships?

Gotta love it when apologists defend outrageous mass-murders and genocides "because they rejected the messengers!" or in other words, because they failed to recognise the supremacy of an obsessively jealous tribal diety who apparently likes to flex his muscles at every opportunity, but has been mysteriously quite and camera-shy for a long time!

Of course he's racist brah. The Middle-East, specifically Arabia is his favourite destination in the world. No wonder the early exegetes and scholars (see Al-Tabari, ibn Taymiyyah et al) considered Arabs to be the most pious, and most important in the eyes of Allahn. LOL, Israelites are not "followers of Jacob". Rather, they are his descendants, and favoured by God due to the plethora of messengers sent to them specifically (for whatever reason). It's not a case of Allahn preferring believers over disbelievers (though this is just an example of Allahn's pettiness), rather they are preferred due to their location, lineage and ancestory. As for the English usage of the colour black(?) or darkness in a negative way, I've never come across anyone say something like "evil people have black faces, or will have black faces", nor have I come across a portrayal of evil people as exclusively black. Here's the hadith of the black woman; here's the one about black dogs. Here's a series of hadith, emphasising Mo's white complexion (presumably because his companions believed whiteness = good): Bukhari 4767, 123, 8693, etc.

Of course, you will no doubt deny or rationalise all of this, but then again you're a Muslim conservative who is obligated to defend his religion, regardless of its unpleasantness. Have a nice day, Ornlu.

Gotta love it when apologists defend outrageous mass-murders and genocides "because they rejected the messengers!" or in other words, because they failed to recognise the supremacy of an obsessively jealous tribal diety who apparently likes to flex his muscles at every opportunity, but has been mysteriously quite and camera-shy for a long time!

Of course he's racist brah. The Middle-East, specifically Arabia is his favourite destination in the world. No wonder the early exegetes and scholars (see Al-Tabari, ibn Taymiyyah et al) considered Arabs to be the most pious, and most important in the eyes of Allahn. LOL, Israelites are not "followers of Jacob". Rather, they are his descendants, and favoured by God due to the plethora of messengers sent to them specifically (for whatever reason). It's not a case of Allahn preferring believers over disbelievers (though this is just an example of Allahn's pettiness), rather they are preferred due to their location, lineage and ancestory. As for the English usage of the colour black(?) or darkness in a negative way, I've never come across anyone say something like "evil people have black faces, or will have black faces", nor have I come across a portrayal of evil people as exclusively black. Here's the hadith of the black woman; here's the one about black dogs. Here's a series of hadith, emphasising Mo's white complexion (presumably because his companions believed whiteness = good): Bukhari 4767, 123, 8693, etc.

Of course, you will no doubt deny or rationalise all of this, but then again you're a Muslim conservative who is obligated to defend his religion, regardless of its unpleasantness. Have a nice day, Ornlu.

Not his fault god created him like this is it? If God has such a problem with it he's more than welcome to fix his mistake.

All that knowledge and big talk and still on the road to hell fire. I don't even feel sorry for you since someone like you after knowing all this has no clue what Islam really is then you really shouldn't even be bothered with.

P.S: Thanks for proving me also that having all the knowledge in the world or being part of a conservative family doesn't makes you a Muslim but what our "Iman" is from the inside which matters. ^_^

Could I ask, at what level of piety (in your book) should one reach before one is able to commit blasphemy?

For as the Qu'ran teach us, only Allah can know what the sure path to hell fire is, as only he can judge the matter. By making such statements, you are possibly in breach of blasphemy rules.

Like I said before and I'll say it again. Its pointless to bother with people like you since I can see how much you assume you know about Quran. Because I read Quran everyday and there is everything written in it about this. Maybe you have your own Quran you like to believe in.

My advice to you, go read Quran with your eyes opened and repent to Allah for your mistakes. You'll know what Allah tells about who are the people who will get hell fire when you actually maybe read Quran for real.

I get your point, you can't argue with me, because to argue against the truth is a difficult task and your not up for it. Thanks for proving my point and in the eyes of all- there can be little doubt about the correctness of my position.