Your most controversial view?

Its irrelevant to you because it doesn't suit your argument. This attitude of yours we've already established. The simple truth is you are intolerant of anyone that disagrees with your viewpoint which shows an extreme immaturity and naivety.

No, it's irrelevant because it's irrelevant. The original comment was about looking at global trends which show generally rising temperatures, rather than looking at one place on the planet where the temperature has cooled. As far as I can see, that point is perfectly valid.

Africa and the Middle East should be under western rule.

The Muslim faith should no longer be allowed to grow in the UK.

Eugenics is something we should practice albeit a more moderate and liberal version (genetic engineering at birth, financial incentives for certain people not to breed).

I agree. That's what happened to Kyoto when they built the bullet train line from Tokyo to it.

Regardless, I was merely playing devils advocate because this poster continues to claim to have researched climate science and so forth when in reality all this poster has done is googled a selection of academic sources and used them to help formulate his viewpoint. That isn't credible research whatsoever so its a complete myth that this poster, at 18 has done research of any nature. If this person is doing research at 18 of such a credible academic nature then he would be regarded as a genius. I suspect that isn't the case and thus his viewpoint is no more valid than anyone else's put forward on here. The truth is, this poster suffers from a bewildering superiority complex, parades around the forum as if he's an 'expert' on climatology when in reality he is not.

I knew the moment I mentioned the global warming man made argument that this poster, due to sheer intolerance and a superiority complex in regard to the subject, would jump straight down my throat with personal attacks and abuse. I honestly cant wait until the poster in question goes to university and grows up. They're in for a shock, that is for sure.

Whilst this is true, it is also the same for the media. When I say I don't trust them, I mean wholesomely.


This.

1. How much cream do you think they use in proportion to the time they spend outdoors. And one should question the effectiveness of the creams they most likely buy. And I would not expect farmers to be overly rational regarding the use of cream. You also gotta think of those who also work there but can't afford the cream. And there will be tons of those.

2. My, you are bit extreme, aren't you? You need not to think of nakedness or winter-level clothing. Our discussion focuses on the continuum between both. And that's where skin cancer would most easily hit. Because it can.

Regardless, I was merely playing devils advocate because this poster continues to claim to have researched climate science and so forth when in reality all this poster has done is googled a selection of academic sources and used them to help formulate his viewpoint. That isn't credible research whatsoever so its a complete myth that this poster, at 18 has done research of any nature. If this person is doing research at 18 of such a credible academic nature then he would be regarded as a genius. I suspect that isn't the case and thus his viewpoint is no more valid than anyone else's put forward on here. The truth is, this poster suffers from a bewildering superiority complex, parades around the forum as if he's an 'expert' on climatology when in reality he is not.

I knew the moment I mentioned the global warming man made argument that this poster, due to sheer intolerance and a superiority complex in regard to the subject, would jump straight down my throat with personal attacks and abuse. I honestly cant wait until the poster in question goes to university and grows up. They're in for a shock, that is for sure.

"Oh the hypocrisy"

YOU HAVE DONE NO CREDIBLE RESEARCH WHATSOEVER. You haven't even been to university. You are a college student. You have done NO RESEARCH. Please stop perpetuating this myth that you've done any credible research at all because you haven't. You live in a realm of your own delusion. Its quite shocking really. If you've done any credible research whatsoever of an academic nature then you would be published. You are not so stop living in dreamland. What you have done is look up things others have researched to help formulate your argument/viewpoint.

You were the first person who started with the insults so stop crying now when you get them back. If you cant handle darts being thrown at you then do not throw them in the first instance.

Regardless, I was playing devils advocate all along so I really couldn't care less. I am not the one pretending to be an expert on something at 18 and claiming to have done research. You wouldn't know what credible 'research' was if it slapped you in the face. I, someone who is now studying at postgraduate level, do know what actual research is.

So in simple terms you believe in Western colonialism. Hmm that's worked out amazingly in the world hasn't it?

I don't think Chlorophile has ever claimed to be an expert, it just seems he's researched something he's interested in. Lots of people do that with lots of different things. In the media I see plenty of climate change deniers pretending to be experts.

Not in the way we did before. Rather we'd impose a western constitution on them to create a freer and more prosperous environment while dealing with their defense and foreign policy. They'd deal with tax and spend... We've been waiting decades for them to take off and only a small minority are remotely respectable countries.

Cats are disgusting creatures and they should all stop existing. Big cats likes lions & stuff are totally awesome though

To encourage more people (especially from poorer backgrounds) to enter higher education. A more educated population is a better one.


Posted from TSR Mobile

So in simple terms you believe in Western colonialism. Hmm that's worked out amazingly in the world hasn't it?

Then he shouldn't go around claiming he has done this research and that research. He has done no credible research whatsoever. If he had done such, he would be published and its as simple as that. His arguments would be laughed at in the postgraduate community because he can sing and shout all day long about how he's done this and that but until he's done research of a truly academic and scrutinised nature its worthless. And yes, the attitude he flaunts around the forum with, i.e. using condescending language and abusing people for having a difference of opinion does show intolerance of something and if you are going to take that approach then you better have good reason for it. He has done NO research whatsoever of any credible nature on the subject. If so, he'll be able to provide us all with his published papers.