Usually when people talk about
"attractive guys", they are referring to 'conventionally attractive' e.g. those broadly conceived of as aesthetically pleasing. If this was not your intention but you instead meant, for example,
"guys who the girl in question finds attractive",* then this would seem a lot less controversial, if a little tautological; I would still protest, however, that girls can friendzone a guy they find attractive e.g. on the basis of (presumed) character defects/fundamental mismatch, although naturally I would concede that this is rarely absolute
We are not friends
Jolly good, poor young lads can’t take too many japes, delicate egos ‘n’ all..
If only they knew?..
For sure,
it takes two to tango, as we say
Ah right, yes, might be as well to add another string to your bow. They do keep insisting that they run Java on over 3 billion devices so, you know.. if you ever need to communicate with I dunno, a photocopier or something, I guess it might come in handy
Well thank goodness for that, tests at this time of night wouldn’t be much fun!- that said, I perform best at night, personally
(that sounded more innocent in my head)
Bella?
How positively charming
Ah well, can’t all be perfect
Would you friendzone a guy on the basis of his right-wing political beliefs? (he says, attempting to keep this on topic)
Hold up
Just because you lefties like to
'move the goal posts' (and don’t know where they are half the time) does
not mean you don’t have ‘fixed attitudes’!
Please, tell me more..
Hmm, I was with you regarding short-sighted* people, and I suppose I agree that a more sophisticated mind is rarely satisfied, but I believe that balance/cohesion and happiness are generally positive correlates