The WWE Society II

OP

Original post by ArsenalWenger

Yeah that set the ball rolling. Him stopping the steph slap :biggrin:

. The main event could be a real mess, the heel who hardly appears seemed to get a louder pop than the baby face who won the rumble.

Posted from TSR Mobile

I'll be watching WM purely for Sting-HHH and Wyatt-Undertaker (WHAT a promo from the former last night!). I never have too much hope for the main event of Mania, but let's hope for a Rollins cash-in or a Lesnar retainment.

Reply 1142

AR_95

Not excited about WM this season, and from the looks of it neither are the WWE it's self

Reply 1143

OP

That Axel segment though >>>

Reply 1144

ArsenalWenger

8

Original post by Mackay

That Axel segment though >>>

Yeah snoop mania running wild :cool:

. I'm actually a very big fan of Reigns but the way he has been booked I can't see him winning and getting a top reaction. They really did **** up with how they booked the rumble. Before that, reigns was getting pretty loud pops.

Posted from TSR Mobile

Reply 1145

OP

Original post by ArsenalWenger

Yeah snoop mania running wild :cool:

. I'm actually a very big fan of Reigns but the way he has been booked I can't see him winning and getting a top reaction. They really did **** up with how they booked the rumble. Before that, reigns was getting pretty loud pops.

Posted from TSR Mobile

The issues comes back to the IWC really. Back in The Shield, Reigns was the cool choice. He was wanted to win the Rumble last year, but all of a sudden it becomes clear that WWE are planning to make him the new Cena, and fans revolt. It's a shame. I really like Reigns - and he's bound to be an absolute star - but I'm just against WWE shoving him down our throats. I think the Reigns lack of reaction is more aimed at WWE Creative and Vince than it is Reigns' ability. He's still slightly green in the ring, and has a lot better to do on the mic, but he's no worse than some of the former champions we've had.

He's easily the natural fit to be the company's next guy. He excites little kids, he excites women with his movie-star looks, and he excites adults/teens with his bad-ass nature. They need to book him like Goldberg: no talking, just being a bad-ass and kicking people's ass all over the place.

Reply 1146

username360639

14

What's good guys :biggrin:

Same. when sting opened raw that was pretty cool and I loved how JBL kept on saying Snoop's been working out :laugh:

Reply 1147

OP

A Heyman turn in favour of Reigns wouldn't be the worst thing in the world, either. I can smell big money for him being a heel.

Reply 1148

Original post by Mackay

They need to book him like Goldberg: no talking, just being a bad-ass and kicking people's ass all over the place.

Isn't that what Undertaker does?

Reply 1149

ozzyoscy

Original post by Dean Ambrose

Not helpful.

It's helpful if it created an epiphany, it didn't so It'll take more than a post to solve the issues you're having, especially if one saying 'go to an event' is what you consider helpful. You have a long way to go.

Reply 1150

OP

Original post by Dean Ambrose

Isn't that what Undertaker does?

Taker's better on the mic than Goldberg, though, who was notoriously poor.

Reply 1151

Original post by ozzyoscy

It's helpful if it created an epiphany, it didn't so It'll take more than a post to solve the issues you're having, especially if one saying 'go to an event' is what you consider helpful. You have a long way to go.

What do you mean I have a long way to go? What issues? Can't you just talk normally for crying out loud?

Reply 1152

AR_95

It's not "poor" booking from WWE. It's just lazy. The WWE know they could have done a lot better but it seems like there must be some sort of internal feud between creative because honestly this is probably the most lack luster build up in history.

Reply 1153

ozzyoscy

Original post by Dean Ambrose

What do you mean I have a long way to go? What issues? Can't you just talk normally for crying out loud?

You always seem to have a problem understanding what people say.

Reply 1154

Original post by ozzyoscy

You always seem to have a problem understanding what people say.

No, just yours.

Reply 1155

ozzyoscy

Original post by Dean Ambrose

No, just yours.

You created a thread called 'Can someone tell me if these situations with females were hints?'

I'm aware you have some sort of interpersonal, anxiety type issues, I'm just saying. It's kinda pointless plastering it all over the internet then saying it's everyone else's fault.

Reply 1156

Original post by ozzyoscy

You created a thread called 'Can someone tell me if these situations with females were hints?'

I'm aware you have some sort of interpersonal, anxiety type issues, I'm just saying. It's kinda pointless plastering it all over the internet then saying it's everyone else's fault.

How am I saying It's everyone elses fault?

How do I have Interpersonal anxiety type issues? You're really stressing me out now.

(edited 9 years ago)

Reply 1157

OP

Original post by AR_95

It's not "poor" booking from WWE. It's just lazy. The WWE know they could have done a lot better but it seems like there must be some sort of internal feud between creative because honestly this is probably the most lack luster build up in history.

The feud probably comes from differing ideas of who the next top star is. We all know Triple H's ideal top guy is far removed from Vince's. Vince pushed the Great Khali ffs. I can't wait for HHH's WWE. He's got a much stronger vision for the company.

Reply 1158

IanDangerously

20

We're just 5 days away from WrestleMania, but it feels like we're about 35 days away. That's how the build feels this year, if the storylines were at the point they are now coming out of the February PPV you'd say it's a decent start and look forward to seeing it kick into a higher gear in the final month. But it hasn't.

I honestly can't believe WrestleMania is this Sunday. Yes, THIS Sunday.

Reply 1159

OP