The Student Room Group

Dimensional Analysis

Please can anyone offer me feedback on whether I've answered these dimensional analysis questions (see attached picture) correctly?

dimentional analysis.jpg

Dimensions =
[length] = L
[time] = T
[mass] = M
[number] = 1

i) d = 1/2 at^2

d = L
a = L^2T^-2
t = T

1/2 at ^2 = [1/2][a][t]
= 1 L^2T^-2
= L^2T^-2?

Not well formed??

NB: I assumed that [a] was L^2T^-2 after looking at this:

Acceleration.jpg


ii) Is the answer mv? Because ...

[M] = L
[v] = [ms^-1]
[v] = [m] [s^-1]
[v] = [m] :undefined:^-1

[mv] = [m][v]
= MLT^-1

Also:
[v] = [distance]/[time]
=L/T = LT^-1

?

I hope this makes sense.

Thank you very much for your help and advice.
Reply 1
[QUOTE="Ggdf;55070303"]Please can anyone offer me feedback on whether I've answered these dimensional analysis questions (see attached picture) correctly?

dimentional analysis.jpg

Dimensions =
[length] = L
[time] = T
[mass] = M
[number] = 1

i) d = 1/2 at^2

d = L
a = L^2T^-2
t = T

1/2 at ^2 = [1/2][a][t]
= 1 L^2T^-2
= L^2T^-2?

Not well formed??

NB: I assumed that [a] was L^2T^-2 after looking at this:

Acceleration.jpg


ii) Is the answer mv? Because ...

[M] = L
[v] = [ms^-1]
[v] = [m] [s^-1]
[v] = [m] :^-1:

Re-check your dimensions for acceleration a :smile:
Reply 2
Original post by davros
Re-check your dimensions for acceleration a :smile:


Thank you. Would it be LT-2?
Reply 3
Original post by Ggdf
Thank you. Would it be LT-2?


Correct :smile:
Reply 4
Original post by davros
Correct :smile:


Thank you so much :smile:.

Would this be correct?

i) d = 1/2 at^2

d = L
a = LT-2
t = T

1/2 at ^2 = [1/2][a][t]
= 1 LT-2
= LT-2?

Would it still not be well formed as the equation is not the same on both sides?
Reply 5
Original post by Ggdf
Thank you so much :smile:.

Would this be correct?

i) d = 1/2 at^2

d = L
a = LT-2
t = T

1/2 at ^2 = [1/2][a][t]
= 1 LT-2
= LT-2?

Would it still not be well formed as the equation is not the same on both sides?


You don't seem to have done anything with the dimensions of t^2!!
Reply 6
Original post by davros
You don't seem to have done anything with the dimensions of t^2!!


d = 1/2 at^2

d = L
a = LT-2
t = T

1/2 at ^2 = [1/2][a][t]
= 1 LT-2 T^2
= LT-2T^2

?

Thank you :smile:
Reply 7
Original post by Ggdf
d = 1/2 at^2

d = L
a = LT-2
t = T

1/2 at ^2 = [1/2][a][t]
= 1 LT-2 T^2
= LT-2T^2

?

Thank you :smile:


And what do you get if you work out T2×T2T^{-2} \times T^2 ?
Reply 8
Original post by davros
And what do you get if you work out T2×T2T^{-2} \times T^2 ?

I'm not sure .. Would it just be T?
Reply 9
Original post by Ggdf
I'm not sure .. Would it just be T?


No, this is just the normal law of indices am×an=am+na^m \times a^n = a^{m+n} applied to dimensions.

So in this case you have T2×T2=T0=1T^2 \times T^{-2} = T^0 = 1 i.e. there is no T dependence! So all you are left with in your equation is L, which is what you want :smile:
Reply 10
Original post by davros
No, this is just the normal law of indices am×an=am+na^m \times a^n = a^{m+n} applied to dimensions.

So in this case you have T2×T2=T0=1T^2 \times T^{-2} = T^0 = 1 i.e. there is no T dependence! So all you are left with in your equation is L, which is what you want :smile:


Oh, I see what you mean! Therefore it is well formed as d [L] = [L]?

You have been incredibly helpful and kind to assist me with this. I'm really grateful! :smile:

Quick Reply

Latest