OCR G542 Psychology Monday 18th May *OFFICIAL THREAD*

Yes but with the y- axis saying changes in volume of right posterior, with -8 that is a decrease so how can it be positive correlation if some of the results were showing the volume decreased to me that makes no sense! 😕

60%, which isn't too bad.

I seriously wouldn't beat yourself up over that; I began writing about the same thing, until I realised it said model and not victim. Even then, the wording of the question being "Outline two of..." confused me into thinking there must be more than two conditions, which there is for the victim, but there is only two conditions for the model (early and late).

Expect a lot of people to have tripped up on that one; OCR's fault.

Yes but with the y- axis saying changes in volume of right posterior, with -8 that is a decrease so how can it be positive correlation if some of the results were showing the volume decreased to me that makes no sense! 😕

Yh im soo disapointed in myself. Sigggghhhhhh. Do you think any marks will be given?

There's 4 model conditions... Critical early, critical late, adjacent early and adjacent late...

I'm afraid not. Only intelligence tests fall under psychometric tests. Projective tests are separate as they measure personality and not intelligence.

So I guess my predictions for Section B were wrong but was right on Psychodynamic and the fact that the style was in line with last summer. Hope my resources helped Lol particularly the Section C. Felt quite confident walking out of the exam The Section A was certainly easier than last harder. Section B was also quite straightforward I chose Milgram. The Paper seemed to emphasise ethical issues which I thought was odd but hope I helped anyways.

Also when it say's why was your experiment conducted? Are you meant to say backround information??!?!? Cause I just said an aim.!!! , if so I julost out on 2 easy marks.... *cries*

I felt the same as you as well. I predicted Psychodynamic and/or Developmental as approaches for Section C; obviously Developmental never featured. Section A was indeed MUCH easier than last summer; especially when OCR decided to give 4 of the easiest marks to us for the Maguire question on interpreting the scattergraph lol.

By the way, I couldn't think of 4 results for the 8 marker on Section B for Milgram. I just wrote 3; 65% of Ps administering up to 450v, all Ps administering up to 300v, and the physical/emotional signs of distress that the Ps showed. What would be a fourth result? Would I need a fourth result to get the full 8 marks, or would the 3 that I mentioned enough for the 8 marks?

To everyone freaking out about the Maguire question... I am 99% sure it was positive correlation. Mainly because it's positive correlation between volume change and time spent as a taxi driver in the actual study, and also the numbers (you're saying -8 and +8? That's still an increase) are totally irrelevent - the line of best fit showed positive correlation, as as the change in volume increased, so did the time spent as a taxi driver in months. There's pretty much been a question in every previous exam paper, but for example stating the findings in Dement and Kleitman - you literally just get given the answers and have to write them down

I hope so, but I really doubt it. The mark
schemes are quite harsh. Ughhhhh

you could have talked about 3 participants have uncontrollable seizures and one having to be removed as it was so severe/uncontrollable
or
many participants showed signs of tension and a frequent sign of tension was nervous laughing fits

So would I get 6 marks for the 3 results I mentioned, or could I possibly get the full 8 marks?

Anyone do Bandura for scetion B

i did

what did you say for the finding