OCR G542 Psychology Monday 18th May *OFFICIAL THREAD*

I did Bandura. I basically put boys were more physically aggressive/girls slightly more verbally aggressive, how boys responded to same-sex model more aggressively, for girls the gender of model didn't have as significant a difference, and how there was no significant difference in aggression between those in the non-aggressive condition and those in the control group/condition

does mine seem right

Yeah the finding you suggested seems absolutely fine

that's good ,i learnt so many result for Griffiths but i did not use any

Griffiths was actually one of the studies I was not too confident on, I was so happy when Bandura came up!

you were lucky,i would have been happy if it came up but bandura was ok

I was! I was honestly dreading this exam, especially with the changes, I had no idea what would come up! It was a retake for me though, I have a B from last year but thought I may as well try and boost my grade. I'm sure you did great for Bandura!

ohh that good,B is really good but im sure you have done better then before,i must say the question question b was not as hard as before

Do you mean section B? Because I do agree that section B this year was lovely! I don't know what it was about it but I didn't particularly struggle. I honestly thought I did dreadfully last year and was so shocked when I got the B, I didn't think I'd get even a D!

I messed up a few questions in section A, like the piliavin one, Savage-Rumbaugh, didn't answer the Reicher and Haslam one, but I thought the rest of the questions were fine. The Freud one had come up in a past paper beforehand, so had the Maguire one. Section B was pretty good. Messed up the results for Milgram, just didn't put enough detail but am confident that I probably got at least 4 marks for that question and the rest of those ones were fine, I thought. Section C was a challenge. They changed the part a to say outline instead of assume (unless they mean the same thing?) and the 12 marker was terrible, managed to put 2 strengths of ethical issues with regards to physiological approach but couldn't think of any weaknesses, but hoping that I got 6 marks. As long as I get a high C or above I am happy

The grade boundaries are normally quite lenient in this exam so just hoping that they don't go up by a lot cause it was an easier paper, although I am sure the changes in section C would have thrown quite a few people off.

I did Bandura. I basically put boys were more physically aggressive/girls slightly more verbally aggressive, how boys responded to same-sex model more aggressively, for girls the gender of model didn't have as significant a difference, and how there was no significant difference in aggression between those in the non-aggressive condition and those in the control group/condition

I messed up a few questions in section A, like the piliavin one, Savage-Rumbaugh, didn't answer the Reicher and Haslam one, but I thought the rest of the questions were fine. The Freud one had come up in a past paper beforehand, so had the Maguire one. Section B was pretty good. Messed up the results for Milgram, just didn't put enough detail but am confident that I probably got at least 4 marks for that question and the rest of those ones were fine, I thought. Section C was a challenge. They changed the part a to say outline instead of assume (unless they mean the same thing?) and the 12 marker was terrible, managed to put 2 strengths of ethical issues with regards to physiological approach but couldn't think of any weaknesses, but hoping that I got 6 marks. As long as I get a high C or above I am happy

The grade boundaries are normally quite lenient in this exam so just hoping that they don't go up by a lot cause it was an easier paper, although I am sure the changes in section C would have thrown quite a few people off.

I was just wondering... For the Piliavin question if I mainly described the victims but mentioned the timings of the early/late models would I still get at least 1 mark??

Which Piliavin question?

Oh, sorry! The section A one on describing the roles of the model or something like that

I think as long as you mentioned the condition and said the time you should get at least 2