Why do most poor people vote conservative?

Because they massively work towards a handful of people at the top. If you're not one of those then you're pissing on your own leg. If you're poor especially.
Someone on £40k for example who can't afford private healthcare would have benefited from a mansion tax which would have pumped more money into the NHS, for example.

Actually 'scrongers' from poorer background form UKIPs core support. Hence UKIP did very well in poor areas.
But 'scroungers' is a myth. There a few for sure but it costs this country pittance. Less than a hundreth of what we lose through tax avoidance and evasion yet that seems perfectly okay?

So what happens when a woman has a child? Do we let it starve? You can't wait for children to starve?

What happens when you become unemployed? Would you be okay with being kicked out on to the street? I hope then you appreciate welfare cuts.

The Tories are going to put more money into the NHS than Labour...

It is funny that you say that, you have 0 proof UKIP support consists of mostly the unemployed and scroungers. Lol what a pathetic comment, one I might as well ignore because majority of the country all know the Labour party is the party of the unemployed and benefit claimants. It has been a national fact for decades

Did you not acknowledge my point on a fund you can voluntarily pay Into? If the problem is as small as you say then you should not have a problem with such a policy. However we should not fund a women who has a child knowing she can not support it, plain and simple. What more do you want me to say?

If I become unemployed I very much hope I get kicked on to the streets and the government do not pay for my lifestyle. It's the fair and honourable thing to do.

Haha if you think for one minute Labour will see the end of tax avoidance, you my friend are quite simply a retard. Tax avoidance rose in the Labour years, it is simething we can not truly sort out unless we reform Europe, but of course Labour are pro Europe so I doubt that happening. Lool I can not help but just lol at the fact you think a party like labour will sort tax avoidance, just wow

And you have ZERO proof that any scroungers are Labour supporters.
Go on, give me hard evidence. Oh wait, you can't.#
So if you go unemployed you should be kicked onto the streets?
You're a very weird person.
I think you need a girlfriend.

Well considering Labour aren't in government, putting £0.01p would be more...

I'll believe it when I see it. They haven't said where the 8 billion is going to come from. They've been asked many times and have simply given no answer. It was a bluff and the electorate fell for it.

I am surprised you still fail to acknowledge my point on a fund set up for these "people". I sense you agree with me , hahahahahaha, 1 point to me then.

P.S. Tory majority for the next 5 years of your life. #EDMiliband

And you have ZERO proof that any scroungers are Labour supporters.
Go on, give me hard evidence. Oh wait, you can't.#
So if you go unemployed you should be kicked onto the streets?
You're a very weird person.
I think you need a girlfriend.

Yeah we'll see. Still, even if they only put in half the £8bn promised that'd be more than Labour pledged.

I suspect running a lower surplus, there is a fair buffer there.

They did want to raise benefits, and when in power they did continually raise the amount people got. The reason why the lost the election was because they focused so heavily on a minority of people and pretty much ignored the majority.

For at least this election, Labour was definitely not trying to get "working people succeeding" - ironically a phrase used by Miliband multiple times. A working person does not succeed when their tax is being raised, when there is more public spending and when business is being attacked.

A working person succeeds when they pay less tax, when they can get a house with a lower deposit needed, when they can access the pension they worked so hard to save and when the company they are working for grows.

They did want to raise benefits, and when in power they did continually raise the amount people got. The reason why the lost the election was because they focused so heavily on a minority of people and pretty much ignored the majority.

For at least this election, Labour was definitely not trying to get "working people succeeding" - ironically a phrase used by Miliband multiple times. A working person does not succeed when their tax is being raised, when there is more public spending and when business is being attacked.

A working person succeeds when they pay less tax, when they can get a house with a lower deposit needed, when they can access the pension they worked so hard to save and when the company they are working for grows.

If anything the tories will benefit my family.

You're a family of millionaires?

Labour wanted to raise the minimum wage so these low paid people got more money than would be saved from the tax threshold for them.

Raising benefits is not about giving to scroungers but about ensuring people who become unemployed can continue to live.

Raising benefits is still not the long term solution though is it? The money saved from reducing/not raising it can be invested into bringing more industry and business to the UK - to then get them a job which pays them more.

Raising benefits is still not the long term solution though is it? The money saved from reducing/not raising it can be invested into bringing more industry and business to the UK - to then get them a job which pays them more.

Well it is to those who are too ill to work and need support. It also is to those who lose their jobs and need a temporary safety net to get them back on their feet.

Call me a champagne socialist if you want, I take it as a massive compliment.

I should've made it clear those too ill to work should be excluded from any benefit changes.