The Student Room Group

AQA Physics PHYA4 - Thursday 11th June 2015 [Exam Discussion Thread]

Scroll to see replies

Maybe it's to do with the fact they're in equilibrium

Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 2081
Original post by Jimmy20002012
Electric field line always act from positive to negative, so if the electric field in upwards the particle must have a negative charge. I think this is why, but not 100% sure.


Original post by huniibehi
I know that's what I thought! But no diagram so I don't get why it would be positive

Posted from TSR Mobile


Oh I see sorry, I misread the question in the first place -,-

Here's what the question is saying:
ImageUploadedByStudent Room1432832281.933625.jpg


Posted from TSR Mobile
Oh right thanks!! One more thing, could you lend me your brain for this exam?

Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 2083
Original post by huniibehi
Oh right thanks!! One more thing, could you lend me your brain for this exam?

Posted from TSR Mobile


😂 would if I could... But that would leave me not only failing physics but kind of a little... Lifeless :wink:


Posted from TSR Mobile
I suppose you could have my brain, that way you wouldn't be lifeless although you'd still fail physics :awesome:

Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 2085
Original post by huniibehi
I suppose you could have my brain, that way you wouldn't be lifeless although you'd still fail physics :awesome:

Posted from TSR Mobile


Oh come on. Positivity! (Insert pun about electric fields).


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by CD223
Question 10:
The answer is B.

This is because resonance curves show that a system reaches maximum amplitude (a sharp resonance peak) when the driving frequency equals the natural frequency if the damping is light.

ImageUploadedByStudent Room1432810373.619885.jpg

When a system is damped more and more, the amplitude at resonance is reduced and moreover, the resonant frequency is slightly reduced.


Posted from TSR Mobile


You're a babe! Thank you so much - I'll have a read now :smile:
Reply 2088
Original post by aprocrastinator
You're a babe! Thank you so much - I'll have a read now :smile:


No problem haha! Just hope it helps :smile:


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by CD223
No problem haha! Just hope it helps :smile:


Posted from TSR Mobile


It's great thank you! Just one question - I think I'm being really thick but how do you derive 2Em square root to be the momentum from the kinetic energy equation? :smile:
anyone have an easy way of getting their head around fields?? ha ha ha
Reply 2091
Original post by aprocrastinator
It's great thank you! Just one question - I think I'm being really thick but how do you derive 2Em square root to be the momentum from the kinetic energy equation? :smile:


Does this help?

ImageUploadedByStudent Room1432838673.777596.jpg


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 2092
Original post by oonic0rn
anyone have an easy way of getting their head around fields?? ha ha ha


Which aspects?:smile:


Posted from TSR Mobile
Doing more than 3 of these 1:45 mins papers per day is brutal lol


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by CD223
Anyone care to explain why sharp points produce intense fields?

Is it something to do with:
[br]E=ΔVΔd[br][br]E = \dfrac{\Delta V}{\Delta d}[br]

Where there is a large potential across a small distance?


Posted from TSR Mobile


Words won't suffice the reason as to why sharp points produce intense electric fields and I'm not sure about the answer but experimental observations suggest that electric field strength is proportional to charge density, that is charge per unit area. The theoretical understanding of it can seemingly be achieved by Gauss's Law.


Posted from TSR Mobile


i just cant get my head around them, i dont even know what i dont know:frown:

the whole of unit 4 is driving me crazy!!!:angry:
Reply 2096
Original post by Mehrdad jafari
Doing more than 3 of these 1:45 mins papers per day is brutal lol


Posted from TSR Mobile


Ouch! 3 PHYA4 papers? Or?

Original post by Mehrdad jafari
Words won't suffice the reason as to why sharp points produce intense electric fields and I'm not sure about the answer but experimental observations suggest that electric field strength is proportional to charge density, that is charge per unit area. The theoretical understanding of it can seemingly be achieved by Gauss's Law.

Posted from TSR Mobile


Ah! Thank you! Given that it's something we don't need to know, I'm hoping there won't be a question on it aha!


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 2097
Original post by oonic0rn
i just cant get my head around them, i dont even know what i dont know:frown:

the whole of unit 4 is driving me crazy!!!:angry:


Ironically, I prefer unit 4 to unit 5! What option do you do?:smile:


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by CD223
Ouch! 3 PHYA4 papers? Or?



Ah! Thank you! Given that it's something we don't need to know, I'm hoping there won't be a question on it aha!


Posted from TSR Mobile


Yeah, or even the chemistry ones are just horrible.


Hopefully not, but always the examiners find something simple and make it so complicated that cannot be considered physics anymore lol


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 2099
Original post by Mehrdad jafari
Yeah, or even the chemistry ones are just horrible.


Hopefully not, but always the examiners find something simple and make it so complicated that cannot be considered physics anymore lol


Posted from TSR Mobile


That's very true. Seems it's impossible to understand the simplest concepts in papers these days -.-


Posted from TSR Mobile

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending