The Student Room Group

AQA Physics PHYA4 - Thursday 11th June 2015 [Exam Discussion Thread]

Scroll to see replies

Original post by Paul Dirac
I would say B: Clearly momentum doesn't change. For the kinetic energy, we know that the collision will slow down their overall speed (clearly they can't travel together at more than or equal to the speed of the first car!). But their mass is increased. kinetic energy is proportional to mv^2, where m gets bigger and v gets smaller, as we just showed. But v is squared, so v getting smaller causes more affect overall, so mv^2 get smaller overall. Hence the kinetic energy decreases. So: momentum is unchanged, kinetic energy decreases --> option B.


Omg I remember thinking this when I first did this question 😁😁

Thanks for reminding me!! I'm sure there will be a more logical way of doing it but I'm happy with that


Posted from TSR Mobile
It's quite confusing if you do it in a mechanics maths way. That's obviously why they don't use numbers with it


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 2822
Original post by gcsestuff
It's quite confusing if you do it in a mechanics maths way. That's obviously why they don't use numbers with it


Posted from TSR Mobile


I am good with numbers i dont like ratii and when something is proportional to tbe other etc

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by a.a.k
I am good with numbers i dont like ratii and when something is proportional to tbe other etc

Posted from TSR Mobile


Both come from the same thing. I prefer neither. Before the mathematics of it is derived you have got to use your reasoning then to derive the mathematics of it. Unfortunately the education goes the other round


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 2824
Original post by Mehrdad jafari
Both come from the same thing. I prefer neither. Before the mathematics of it is derived you have got to use your reasoning then to derive the mathematics of it. Unfortunately the education goes the other round


Posted from TSR Mobile


Well i am not good with reason but facts

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by a.a.k
Well i am not good with reason but facts

Posted from TSR Mobile


Facts are obtained by the process of reasoning


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by a.a.k
I am good with numbers i dont like ratii and when something is proportional to tbe other etc

Posted from TSR Mobile


Original post by gcsestuff
It's quite confusing if you do it in a mechanics maths way. That's obviously why they don't use numbers with it


Posted from TSR Mobile

Not too hard actually, I just found a way to do it.

Let the mass of the first truck be m and let their combined mass be M. Let the speed of the first truck before the collision be v, and let their speed together after the collision V.

Momentum is conserved so mv=MV, i.e. V=mv/M.

Kinetic energy of first truck before collision: 0.5mv^2

Kinetic energy of both trucks together: 0.5MV^2=0.5M(mv/M)^2=0.5m^2v^2/M.

We want to find out which of these kinetic energies is larger.

First one is 0.5v^2*m, second is 0.5v^2(m^2/M), so we can ignore the factors of 0.5v^2 and concentrate on comparing the sizes of m and m^2/M. But M>m, because M=combined mass of m and the other truck. Therefore m^2/M<m^2/m=m. So the second kinetic energy is less than the first one, i.e. kinetic energy decreases.
Reply 2827
Original post by Mehrdad jafari
Facts are obtained by the process of reasoning


Posted from TSR Mobile


Did i say before i wasnt good with words. I think did. Si plz excuse me i dont know what i am saying

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Paul Dirac
Not too hard actually, I just found a way to do it.

Let the mass of the first truck be m and let their combined mass be M. Let the speed of the first truck before the collision be v, and let their speed together after the collision V.

Momentum is conserved so mv=MV, i.e. V=mv/M.

Kinetic energy of first truck before collision: 0.5mv^2

Kinetic energy of both trucks together: 0.5MV^2=0.5M(mv/M)^2=0.5m^2v^2/M.

We want to find out which of these kinetic energies is larger.

First one is 0.5v^2*m, second is 0.5v^2(m^2/M), so we can ignore the factors of 0.5v^2 and concentrate on comparing the sizes of m and m^2/M. But M>m, because M=combined mass of m and the other truck. Therefore m^2/M<m^2/m=m. So the second kinetic energy is less than the first one, i.e. kinetic energy decreases.


Yeah just followed what you did and it works. Thanks!!


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by gcsestuff
Yeah just followed what you did and it works. Thanks!!


Posted from TSR Mobile

I would probably do this way in an exam to make sure.
Love how this forums is nocturnal


Posted from TSR Mobile
Reply 2831
Original post by gcsestuff
Love how this forums is nocturnal


Posted from TSR Mobile


I had to google what noctornul means lol

Posted from TSR Mobile
ImageUploadedByStudent Room1433633512.348967.jpg

Sorry for so many questions.

Do I have the right idea about this?


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by gcsestuff
ImageUploadedByStudent Room1433633512.348967.jpg

Sorry for so many questions.

Do I have the right idea about this?


Posted from TSR Mobile

Can you post the full Q
Anyone know if there's solomon papers for physics?
Reply 2835
Original post by Paul Dirac
Anyone know if there's solomon papers for physics?


Dont think so

Posted from TSR Mobile

I thought so, quite sad :frown:

olympiad ones are too hard
Reply 2837
Original post by Paul Dirac
I thought so, quite sad :frown:


Well...its life

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Paul Dirac
Can you post the full Q


ImageUploadedByStudent Room1433633814.389064.jpg

It's in the text book. And then this is an example questions

ImageUploadedByStudent Room1433633852.497406.jpg

ImageUploadedByStudent Room1433633866.041216.jpg

Part C

ImageUploadedByStudent Room1433633968.385571.jpg

That's how I thought you did it but it's not


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Paul Dirac
I thought so, quite sad :frown:

olympiad ones are too hard


Have you done the old syllabus questions ??


Posted from TSR Mobile

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending