The Student Room Group

AQA Physics PHYA5 - Thursday 18th June 2015 [Exam Discussion Thread]

Scroll to see replies

Can someone help with 2bi please...

image.jpg
Reply 2301
Original post by palaseum9
Turning points 6 marker preductions??

Turning points - Previous 6 markers:
June 14' - TEM microscopes
June 13' - Hertz radio waves experiment (with stationary waves context)
June 12' - Wave-particle duality of light
June 11' - Double Slit experiment (with reference to Newton's and Huygen's theory of light)
June 10' - STM microscopes


Millikan this year probably???

Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by a.a.k
Millikan this year probably???

Posted from TSR Mobile


I'd absolutely love such a question
can anyone tell me what the last 6 markers have been on?? Sect A and Astro
Original post by saad97
Can someone help with 2bi please...

image.jpg


Use P=σAT^4 where A=4πr^2
Original post by a.a.k
Millikan this year probably???

Posted from TSR Mobile


I will not look at the microscopes at all even if i know they will come up lol


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by Gome44
Use P=σAT^4 where A=4πr^2


I have and I've formed a ratio equation but the mark scheme is weird, it's squared one bracket and put the other to the power of 4? :/
Reply 2307
Original post by Mehrdad jafari
You don't need the velocity. Are you talking about the sane question as Jimm asked?
ImageUploadedByStudent Room1434564188.937374.jpg


Posted from TSR Mobile


When i plug some numbers it 2.2 doesnt turn out .1434564443958.jpg

Posted from TSR Mobile
http://filestore.aqa.org.uk/subjects/AQA-PHYA5-2D-QP-JUN13.PDFhey guys could someone please explain to me why in 4 b (iii) after finding the volume the markscheme done mass times volume.I thought if I equated the densities it would be mass divided by volume.thanks in advance :smile:
Reply 2309
Original post by kevincarreira
can anyone tell me what the last 6 markers have been on?? Sect A and Astro


In the first post of the thread Lau14 has compiled them!


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by MSB47
Well the original equation for inverse square law for gamma is I=k/x2 Right?

If so the k=Io/4pi and the x represents the distance from the sources.

Hope this makes sense :smile:


But k is on top and 4pi is on the bottomimage.jpg
Original post by saad97
I have and I've formed a ratio equation but the mark scheme is weird, it's squared one bracket and put the other to the power of 4? :/


I have no idea then, but remember you've been given diameter
Original post by CD223
In the first post of the thread Lau14 has compiled them!


Posted from TSR Mobile


dude when i click it nothing comes up???

http://prntscr.com/7i3s6y
Reply 2313
For question 4(a)(i) Why do you have to multiply threw by 0.5? Can't figure it out
Thanks
http://filestore.aqa.org.uk/subjects/AQA-PHYA5-2C-QP-JUN12.PDF
Glad I dont do turning points as the grade boundaries for astro are quite low (because many schools who have limited sources do astro although not always true)
Original post by Gome44
I have no idea then, but remember you've been given diameter


Ah nvm I know what they've done, thanks anyway :smile:
I know that to produce a real image with a converging lens you need the object more than a focal length away from the lens but how much further for diminished and how much further for magnified??
Is stellar evolution even on the spec ?
Do people really think it's likely that deriving the kinetic theory will come up? I would have said it's worth more than 6 marks.

Can they set questions that are worth more than 6 marks?
Reply 2319
Original post by Mehrdad jafari
It does for me
ImageUploadedByStudent Room1434564702.601180.jpg


Posted from TSR Mobile


Wth is my calc wrong or what.
I will try it again. This not good for me :angry:

Posted from TSR Mobile

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending