The Student Room Group

A2 Biology OCR June 2015 Revision Thread

Scroll to see replies

Original post by NilaJ
whoops I didn't even see that! Thank I'll edit now!


For the first q I put mitosis and meiosis but not 1 &1 surely I'll still get the marks?😁
Original post by bangla town
I think it's really hard to say

I think grade boundaries for a could be anything from 64-68

I did f215 last year and found it really hard, much harder than this year's paper, and A was 63

I can only see the boundaries increasing for this year

Posted from TSR Mobile

Last years paper wasn't hard, you just had to know the content in depth unlike this year. The long question about transcription and translatingare easy marks as were All the other gene tech questions whereas this year there was less content from the course and more synoptic elements to it. Somrone who learned the spec well would find last year's paper so much easier than this years
Original post by Captain Anonymous
It won't be higher than 65 for an a


Posted from TSR Mobile


That makes sense : I mean if last year's paper is compared with this years then you can see a difference. Last year had a lot of processes and the questions were more straightforward. And there were minimal suggest questions.
This year, there weren't as much as simple questions. Those simple 1 mark questions and just content questions.
Would you say that the grade boundaries will be higher than last years?
It would not be fair, a bit like unit 4. This one was easier but too much suggest, what do you think?
Original post by rainbow16
That makes sense : I mean if last year's paper is compared with this years then you can see a difference. Last year had a lot of processes and the questions were more straightforward. And there were minimal suggest questions.
This year, there weren't as much as simple questions. Those simple 1 mark questions and just content questions.
Would you say that the grade boundaries will be higher than last years?
It would not be fair, a bit like unit 4. This one was easier but too much suggest, what do you think?


I think it'll be the same as last year.

63 A


Posted from TSR Mobile
Original post by ChoccyPhilly
Last years paper wasn't hard, you just had to know the content in depth unlike this year. The long question about transcription and translatingare easy marks as were All the other gene tech questions whereas this year there was less content from the course and more synoptic elements to it. Somrone who learned the spec well would find last year's paper so much easier than this years


That is so true...there werent many marks that you were confident you knew how to answer.
Do you think the grade boundaries will go lower? lower than last year? because in all fairness last years paper was so much easier, I did it as a mock and it was easy as you just had to write the processes. Yet the grade boundaries were only 63. maybe that says something....??
Original post by bangla town
That is strange

June 2012 was 67 for an a! And you found that the hardest? :hmmm:

That means this years paper will be like 68/69 for an a :frown:
Posted from TSR Mobile


But, I'm not every person who took the exam that year. I guess just a lot of weaknesses of mine came up in that paper?

I think the boundaries will be about or lower than 2012's. I found it the hardest, but the questions themselves were quite straight forward in comparison, so in theory it's slightly easier than this year.
Original post by rainbow16
That is so true...there werent many marks that you were confident you knew how to answer. <br />
Do you think the grade boundaries will go lower? lower than last year? because in all fairness last years paper was so much easier, I did it as a mock and it was easy as you just had to write the processes. Yet the grade boundaries were only 63. maybe that says something....??


Difficult to tell. This paper would have benefited a lot of people who didn't learn the content in depth, which would normally be very costly. From that alone, I think it will go up.

For instance, I got an A in the 2014 mock and a friend got. a U and only spent 2 days revising for this exam and it went better for her than me. Why? Because we weren't tested of specific and complex things like the power stroke, muscles or even the nitrogen cycle
Original post by ChoccyPhilly
Difficult to tell. This paper would have benefited a lot of people who didn't learn the content in depth, which would normally be very costly. From that alone, I think it will go up.

For instance, I got an A in the 2014 mock and a friend got. a U and only spent 2 days revising for this exam and it went better for her than me. Why? Because we weren't tested of specific and complex things like the power stroke, muscles or even the nitrogen cycle


Yeah, the muscles stuff didnt even come up. It was a lot of suggest, again, so we were preparing for being asked on the content but that didnt really come up.
A lot of people on TSR were saying it wasnt great, it was pretty mixed etc. A lot of people at my school said it was a good paper but still more difficult than past papers.
I just don't understand why there were so many suggest questions and not much about the book. If the paper was like 2014 it would have made so much more sense.
Some people are saying it is 65 and stuff. but that doesnt make sense.
Original post by games211
yh lool then 9 marker on variations?? is that like 4 QWC marks?


In regards to that question I wrote

- Mutation during replication in interphase (1)
- Crossing over in prophase 1 (1) formation of chiasmata (1)
- Independent/random assortment of bivalents in metaphase 1 (1)
- Independent/random assortment of chromosomes in metaphase 2 (1)
- Fertilisation is random (1)

The question also said to wrote about the role of nuclear division so i wrote:
- Meiosis - reduction division - creates gametes/ 4 haploid non-identical daughter cells (1)
- Mitosis - creates 2 identical diploid cells. (1)

- QWC (1)

Hopefully get these 9 marks!!
Original post by rainbow16
Yeah, the muscles stuff didnt even come up. It was a lot of suggest, again, so we were preparing for being asked on the content but that didnt really come up.<br />
A lot of people on TSR were saying it wasnt great, it was pretty mixed etc. A lot of people at my school said it was a good paper but still more difficult than past papers.<br />
I just don't understand why there were so many suggest questions and not much about the book. If the paper was like 2014 it would have made so much more sense.<br />
Some people are saying it is 65 and stuff. but that doesnt make sense.


I think it does. The top end people will be lowered due to the lack of content qs and the middle band people will be brought up if they're strong at synoptic questions. A lot of people who were expecting 80s may very well get 60s and people expecting 50s may also crack 60, so I think it will go up as a result
Original post by Sadia begum
In regards to that question I wrote

- Mutation during replication in interphase (1)
- Crossing over in prophase 1 (1) formation of chiasmata (1)
- Independent/random assortment of bivalents in metaphase 1 (1)
- Independent/random assortment of chromosomes in metaphase 2 (1)
- Fertilisation is random (1)

The question also said to wrote about the role of nuclear division so i wrote:
- Meiosis - reduction division - creates gametes/ 4 haploid non-identical daughter cells (1)
- Mitosis - creates 2 identical diploid cells. (1)

- QWC (1)

Hopefully get these 9 marks!!


Oh thanks. Did you have to mention mitosis because I thought the qs was asking about genetic variations :frown:
wasnt the first q meiosis 1 and meiosis 2? and then the next one interphase and anaphase? speaking to people in my year, the answers are mixed but there are a few of the ones ive mentioned.
Original post by anonamous007
wasnt the first q meiosis 1 and meiosis 2? and then the next one interphase and anaphase? speaking to people in my year, the answers are mixed but there are a few of the ones ive mentioned.


but why would the mass increase after meiosis 1?
Original post by games211
Oh thanks. Did you have to mention mitosis because I thought the qs was asking about genetic variations :frown:


Well yeah i thought so initially, but the question talked about genetic variety and the role of nuclear division. Mitosis is a type of nuclear division, no? Oh well. As long as you mentioned the role of meiosis and all the rest I think you're good!
Original post by games211
but why would the mass increase after meiosis 1?


the graph increased then decreased. isnt that when bivalents are formed and then during anaphase they split to form 2 cells. then meiosis 2 when the haploid is formed is why the graph decreased from 4 - 1 mass of DNA. ???
Original post by anonamous007
the graph increased then decreased. isnt that when bivalents are formed and then during anaphase they split to form 2 cells. then meiosis 2 when the haploid is formed is why the graph decreased from 4 - 1 mass of DNA. ???


Bivalent just means that the homologous chromosomes condense. You should know from unit 1 that DNA replication occurs during interphase, which is when the DNA mass doubles. Why would the mass double during meiosis when division is already occurring?
Original post by ChoccyPhilly
Bivalent just means that the homologous chromosomes condense. You should know from unit 1 that DNA replication occurs during interphase, which is when the DNA mass doubles. Why would the mass double during meiosis when division is already occurring?


ok, fair enough. what about the next 2? will interphase (when dna replication occurs) be accepted and part b) anaphase ???
Original post by anonamous007
ok, fair enough. what about the next 2? will interphase (when dna replication occurs) be accepted and part b) anaphase ???


I think interphase yeah, but I don't think anaphase is right. What happens at anaphase is that the DNA moves to opposite poles, but they're still in the same cell, so dna mass doesn't halve as the cell still has all its DNA, but in a different structure
hi any unofficial mark scheme out yet?? Many thanks!

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending