The Student Room Group

Edexcel FP3 June 2015 - Official Thread

Scroll to see replies

Original post by 1 8 13 20 42
got like 11.66 but not checked and owing to some of the numbers I obtained I reckon something went wrong early on; think I got the method though..

edit: by the method I mean a method. :redface:


LOL. I actually did make a mistake. -_-' I put a postive in a place where a negative should have been so your answer is prob right XD.

TeeEm, your sub was so much more simplier XD and quicker.

Edit: got 5.57 after correcting my mistake -.-' lol
(edited 8 years ago)
Original post by TeeEm
5 minutes to both my solutions


well if students can do these types of questions, RIP my A*
Reply 342
Can someone please explain how to do question 7b on P3 JUNE 2003
Reply 343
Original post by ninjasinpjs
well if students can do these types of questions, RIP my A*


you will be given a substitution in the exam and you will only be expected to do the one with the limits (easier)
Reply 344
Original post by Boop.
Can someone please explain how to do question 7b on P3 JUNE 2003


I will try in about 5 minutes if no one else is available
Original post by chemlover12
LOL. I actually did make a mistake. -_-' I put a postive in a place where a negative should have been so your answer is prob right XD.

TeeEm, your sub was so much more simplier XD and quicker.


Lol I just redid it in the same way and now I'm getting 9.41. Perhaps I need some early sleep
Reply 346
Original post by TeeEm
Any strong FP3ers out there?

Try this integration (without clues) if you are hard enough...
I will write and post solutions after my dinner (about 1 hour)


i got 9.42 (3sf)
what's the answer?
Original post by TeeEm
Perhaps you are right...
in an exam you will be given a substitution

use 2x = -1 + 4 coshθ

Solutions in about 20 minutes


I actually came up with that sub..just don't think I did the rest properly. :colondollar:
edit: getting something around 9.41 now rather than my answer before
Reply 348
Original post by 1 8 13 20 42
Lol I just redid it in the same way and now I'm getting 9.41. Perhaps I need some early sleep


yes i also got 9.42 (3sf)
Reply 349
Original post by TeeEm
Any strong FP3ers out there?

Try this integration (without clues) if you are hard enough...
I will write and post solutions after my dinner (about 1 hour)


solutions are now attached in post 329
Reply 350
Original post by rachu
yes i also got 9.42 (3sf)


sorry I left it exact
Reply 351
Original post by 1 8 13 20 42
I actually came up with that sub..just don't think I did the rest properly. :colondollar:
edit: getting something around 9.41 now rather than my answer before


my solution is up now so you can check against mine
Original post by TeeEm
my solution is up now so you can check against mine


Hey TeeEm, whats the best way to revise maths?
Reply 353
Original post by Boop.
Can someone please explain how to do question 7b on P3 JUNE 2003


it might be too hard If I try to explain because I do not use standard formulae but I will try if no one else can
Reply 354
Original post by TeeEm
my solution is up now so you can check against mine


when i converted your exact answer to decimal, i got 9.42 . so my answer is correct. Thank you for posting question :smile:
Reply 355
Original post by ninjasinpjs
Hey TeeEm, whats the best way to revise maths?


start as early as possible worked for me
Reply 356
Original post by rachu
when i converted your exact answer to decimal, i got 9.42 . so my answer is correct. Thank you for posting question :smile:


Excellent!
(still worth looking at both my solutions)
Reply 357
Original post by TeeEm
Excellent!
(still worth looking at both my solutions)


yes i looked at your method .. i used the same method .. except fewer lines of working since calculator did most of it! what level would you say this question was? on a scale of 1 to 5 ?
Original post by TeeEm

(still worth looking at both my solutions)


When I type it in I get the same expansion I had :smile: But it'd probably be worth trying to do it exact
Reply 359
Original post by rachu
yes i looked at your method .. i used the same method .. except fewer lines of working since calculator did most of it! what level would you say this question was? on a scale of 1 to 5 ?


the non limit one (mathematician to be)
the limit one without substitution (engineers and physisists...)

joking

well done as they very hard

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending