What actually is a 'cultural Marxist'?

It means you force people to accept people of other races/sexualities/whatever else as equals. It was called cultural bolshevism in nazi germany and its also a favorite term of Breivik and Fox News loons. If somebody uses it it means its time for you to put them in your ignore list. Aint nobody got time for Nazi trash.

It means you force people to accept people of other races/sexualities/whatever else as equals. It was called cultural bolshevism in nazi germany and its also a favorite term of Breivik and Fox News loons. If somebody uses it it means its time for you to put them in your ignore list. Aint nobody got time for Nazi trash.

So, a term that is used by Breivik is immediately a bad term by association? Good logic, lady.

No, that wasn't my logic at all. I was just giving him an example of the type of person who uses it. Although OP already knew it, since he mentioned BNP/UKIP himself.

So, a term that is used by Breivik is immediately a bad term by association? Good logic, lady.

A Cultural Marxist is a disciple of Antonio Gramsci and the Frankfurt School were the big proponents of this. The final place in which change shall occur is in the political institutions (I'm paraphrasing) but the culture must change for the communist revolution to take place. Gramsci basically believed that Marx's prediction for a communist revolution was only not realised because everybody in the West were brainwashed by Capitalist propaganda. This brought forward the idea of a "long march through the institutions"- many communist sympathisers were told not to join the Communist party, but instead to infiltrate both the Labour and Conservative party to gain real power in the system to affect change.

Cultural Marxists believe in equality above all else. They are fascists. They want to censor and control human behaviour beyond the original purview of government. They have no time for individual liberty.

The term Cultural Marxist could easily be replaced by "Gramsciite" or Cultural Revolutionary, but the core is the same. These are people attempting to subvert British law and British culture under the delusion that all people are equal and kinship doesn't matter.

Why shouldn't people be treated as equals and why should kinship matter?

>why should kinship matter.

Yeah. Why should your parents care about your well-being? Why should you have any more allegiance to your friends and family than you do to strangers? Why should you care about anybody but yourself rising to the top?

How discriminatory it must be to be part of a family- that word just triggers me dearly. I see the light now. Kinship doesn't matter, does it? Society would be much better without it.

No idea really. It always feels like they are one step away from blaming the Jews or something.

Seems like a bogey man that doesn't exist.

they arent one step away at all. 'the jewish conspiracy' is a key component of the 'cultural marxism' theory.

I understand your sarcasm but you haven't answered the question. Essentially you've just said that kinship matters because it matters.

Some of the things you've mentioned above don't appear to have anything to do with kinship, or at least the kinship I'm thinking of. To make things easier, what do you think kinship means? Also, why shouldn't people be equal?

I would like to clarify that I'm asking in the context of things like race and sex. Usually people call me a cultural marxist when I say that men and women should be treated as equals or that people white people should be treated the same as non-white people, etc.

Also I'm just asking genuine questions here so I don't particularly understand why you've been sarcastic and somewhat hostile in your response.

If someone worse off than me was a bit of a numpty, I might not like them, but I will still see them as an equal member of society.

A kinship society is one in which the efforts of the citizens are carried out to facilitate the development of children in a sane and private manner. It is a society built on morality, on compassion and on liberty. The majority of this society are not selfish or hedonistic, they do what is best for their family. This means you have strong competition between other families occasionally, but when those feuds escalate, that is what the law is for.

Yes we are all human beings, we are all worth the value of 'one person', but you must understand that in practice it is not the case. The more family and blood relatives you have in a village, the more important you become there compared to an immigrant who just came in off the boat. It has nothing to do with wealth or colour or gender- it is about relation. The same applies in any other country. Just look at Japan or other Asian countries who run on a kinship level still.

Apologies if I came off hostile, but your first post was pithy and flippant.

I can admire some aspects of that society but I can't see the point in others. I can't see the reason as to why close family relations are necessary or why people cannot be selfish or hedonistic at least to some extent. I am not particularly close with my family and have some selfish and hedonistic tendencies though I lead a very happy and healthy life. Things like this do not bother me. Why are they important to you?

I would not say that Japan is a kinship society. The concept of family in Japan is in very rapid decline.