The Student Room Group

Whats one thing you'd never do, sexually?

Scroll to see replies

I'd like to think I'd do almost anything with the opposite gender that happens in the porn media.
Original post by Starvation13
I don't think i'll ever understand that fetish lool. I kind of get the "Chicks with dicks" fetish after a lot of reading, but scat? nope, that's beyond me.

Well erm... that guy.... you know what, I'll just say "it's a free country" cos i am lost for words.


Yeah some fetishes are very hard to understand.:colondollar: I wonder if there is a vomit fetish? I havent heard of anyone with a vomit fetish yet
nothing involving body waste of any kind but i'd try anything else once
Original post by driftawaay
Yeah some fetishes are very hard to understand.:colondollar: I wonder if there is a vomit fetish? I havent heard of anyone with a vomit fetish yet


It exists. It's called emetophila.
:smartass:
Original post by callum_law
I am curious about the last one. Why is it that you're against a little bit of humiliation? Are you an insecure person who can withstand sexual banter?


You think humiliation in this context is just banter?

Okay....
Original post by Twinpeaks
You think humiliation in this context is just banter?

Okay....


It's banter in the sense of there being a mutual appreciation of the frivolity and playfulness within the humiliation acts, and there not being an underlying sincere belief that the humiliated subject has the humiliating characteristics ascribed to them. In that sense, yes, it's likely equivalent to banter.
Anal, choking, anything to do with pooh or wee, anything really painful and threesome with two guys.
Original post by callum_law
It's banter in the sense of there being a mutual appreciation of the frivolity and playfulness within the humiliation acts, and there not being an underlying sincere belief that the humiliated subject has the humiliating characteristics ascribed to them. In that sense, yes, it's likely equivalent to banter.



I think it's the feeling of humiliation or demeaning another, that is the turn on though. Without that, yes it'd feel like banter, but the fetish is the feeling of humiliation. If it was completely frivolous you wouldn't get that feeling of humiliation.

That's what I think anyway, I'm not speaking from first hand experience here...
I'm quite open to almost anything, but I don't want to do the Sado-Maso stuff.
Original post by Twinpeaks
I think it's the feeling of humiliation or demeaning another, that is the turn on though. Without that, yes it'd feel like banter, but the fetish is the feeling of humiliation. If it was completely frivolous you wouldn't get that feeling of humiliation.

That's what I think anyway, I'm not speaking from first hand experience here...


People engage in BDSM humiliation, the roughest forms of humiliation, and return to respectful relationships once they leave the fantasy. It doesn't necessarily entail a sincere belief that the characteristics ascribed are accurate, just as one's partner dressing up in a police uniform does not necessarily entail a sincere belief that one's partner is a member of a law enforcement organisation.
Reply 290
Original post by SecretDuck
I'm quite open to almost anything, but I don't want to do the Sado-Maso stuff.


Would you touch Postal's bum?
Original post by RobML
Would you touch Postal's bum?


Yes, I'm open to anything but Sado-Maso. :smile:
Original post by callum_law
People engage in BDSM humiliation, the roughest forms of humiliation, and return to respectful relationships once they leave the fantasy. It doesn't necessarily entail a sincere belief that the characteristics ascribed are accurate, just as one's partner dressing up in a police uniform does not necessarily entail a sincere belief that one's partner is a member of a law enforcement organisation.



But humiliation isn't about how it looks, it's about how you make a person feel, or are made to feel by another.


It's a psychological technique.
surprised by how many women wouldn't do anal. anal is meant to help women reach orgasm and is more beneficial to the woman that man.

now im curios, why wouldn't you gals do anal?
Reply 294
Original post by SecretDuck
Yes, I'm open to anything but Sado-Maso. :smile:


My bum then? :colone:
Original post by RobML
My bum then? :colone:


Ye. :colone:
Original post by Twinpeaks
But humiliation isn't about how it looks, it's about how you make a person feel, or are made to feel by another.


It's a psychological technique.


I wasn't saying that humiliation only looks to be obnoxious. It can feel obnoxious and hurtful to the participants, but there is an underlying understanding that these feelings only exist to the personae each participant adopts. I compared it to dressing up because to the people who do this it is very much dressing up and developing a role-play.

You have no concept of what the acts entail, so probably not best to offer your opinion on its dynamics.
Original post by callum_law
I wasn't saying that humiliation only looks to be obnoxious. It can feel obnoxious and hurtful to the participants, but there is an underlying understanding that these feelings only exist to the personae each participant adopts. I compared it to dressing up because to the people who do this it is very much dressing up and developing a role-play.

You have no concept of what the acts entail, so probably not best to offer your opinion on its dynamics.



Don't pretend that you are an expert on the matter, because you clearly didn't understand what it was in your original post. Dressing up is not a psychological technique to the extent that humiliation is.
Receive anal (I'm a guy :s)
Original post by Twinpeaks
Don't pretend that you are an expert on the matter, because you clearly didn't understand what it was in your original post. Dressing up is not a psychological technique to the extent that humiliation is.


You continue to repeat your conclusion without interrogating the premises of my argument. Up your game or sit this round out, kid.

Quick Reply