Who's happy Jeremy Corbyn won???

Actually all they have to do is highlight how Labour are now a risk to national security.

And, how exactly are they a risk to national security? The only position I can envisage Labour adopting which has anything remotely to do with national security is the scrapping of Trident.

Yet, despite the paranoid delusions of the Conservatives, getting rid of our nuclear weapons isn't going to result in a Russian-ISIS-Argentinian invasion. One wonders how Germany, Italy, Switzerland and Norway have survived all these years!

Thought-experiment: if we didn't have nuclear weapons today, would politicians be making acquiring them a top priority? Of course not, because we don't need them. The notion that we do is the result of the human tendency to engage in status quo bias, as opposed to objective reality.

They are basically prospect by other western countries having nukes though. Also the Tories don't need to actually believe the crap they spout. It's just politics and Corbyn is going to be painted as an IRA/Islamic terrorist.



Why is Corbyn a threat to families?

I wish we could vote for the SNP in the rest of the UK

I wish we could vote for the SNP in the rest of the UK

I wish we could vote for the SNP in the rest of the UK

All these tories saying they're pleased he won because apparently this will make labour unelectable really are counting their chickens before they're hatched. Given that two thirds of the electorate voted against the tories in the first place and labour lost votes to minor parties for being Diet Tories and having a leader with the charisma of a dead fish. Labour now has a leader who has clearly distinct ideas from the tories and won the leadership with almost two thirds of the votes inspite of all the **** the press threw at him. That sounds like a recipe for a labour win to me.

You can, it is called Labour now
Well, not really.

who cares for conditions of the less fortunate around the country

and the world

and who supports the right social changes.

I'm definitley not. It's nothing to do with his airy fairy ness believing he can create an equal la la land just like that, its more who he associates with. Hamas, Hezebollah, the IRA, Iran and his comments like needing an investigation into Jewish influence in the media- I don't want a PM who associates with people like that and doesn't understand why some people have been outraged by that. I can only hope that he does indeed make Labour unelectable, otherwise as a young Jewish person I would honestly be worried- I couldn't be secure in the knowledge that someone of his convictions would tackle anti semitisim by challenging the views of the people he associates with, as desperately needs to happen and also providing money for security for Jewish schools and synagogues.

If it helps I think Tom Watson, who was voted as deputy, would not put up with any of that crap. He's a really decent bloke.

thats something at least.

Terrorists?

If it helps I think Tom Watson, who was voted as deputy, would not put up with any of that crap. He's a really decent bloke.

Lets be honest, if we really wanted to attract young voters we should have got Stella Creasy in. Because, well

'Milliband was so Londoncentric that he couldn't have found the end of the Northern Line'

Was this the Miliband who lived and went to school in Leeds for 3 years? The one who lived on 2 separate occasions in the USA as a child and was a visiting scholar at Harvard? The one who represented Doncaster North? ( South Yorkshire I believe so a little way north of Cock Fosters.)

Or are you thinking of some one else?