One of the most despicable examples of BBC bias I've ever heard or read.

It's both despicable and disgusting. The BBC is meant to be politically impartial considering they are funded by license fee and subsidised by the government - political impartiality is part of their contract.
It is the equivalent of censorship - the BBC ignores complaints and when people attempt to speak about it on the radio, Nolan cuts them off.

If someone called in saying "open the borders, we need refugees" then he would be happier and keep them on for much longer.

If you're one of those who believes the BBC doesn't harbour an ingrained bias towards left-wing cultural viewpoints, then I encourage you to listen to this.

I thought it was bad enough they were willing to exploit the death of 3 year old children for the purposes of amassing political capital and forcing their ideological indoctrination on the UK, but this is something else:

[video="youtube;09vqhZV6jt8"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?t=1&v=09vqhZV6jt8[/video]

Wait... People actually take time out if their lives to listen to Stephen Nolan? I thought he was employed to avoid dead air.

Ahh, like the Brits do in Spain, nicely integrating, learning the language and 'assimilating fully into Spanish society'...

You really need to get out more.

Wow the way you put 'human beings' is what is despicable here.

Are you LockheedSpooky in disguise?

There biased coverage against Corbyn disproves left wing bias and proves it's right wing bias, at least when it comes to the news.

There biased coverage against Corbyn disproves left wing bias and proves it's right wing bias, at least when it comes to the news.

So rather than producing any evidence or counterargument to substantiate your claims and oppose my opinion, you insult me by telling me I "need to get out more"?
Why, I should get out more rather than voicing my opinions on the very clearly biased management of the airwaves for what is meant to be a politically impartial radio station?

Do you have a point or are you just yet another progressive who believes in group rights ahead of individual rights, the erosion of individual liberty, moral relativism and politically correct group think?

Nah, I understand your point, that on some parts the BBC is leftwing when it's supposed to be impartial.

But seriously, your language makes out as though it's the biggest crime of the 21st century.

So i'm not the only one who's witnessed his appalling threads

Video isn't working on my phone, but still.
Who they are? Humans mate.
And ideologies that they harbour? That's like saying Spain shouldn't let so many Brits go there to retire because they might be secret fascists who have a hidden agenda against any non Brits.

Wait... People actually take time out if their lives to listen to Stephen Nolan? I thought he was employed to avoid dead air.

Could you expand on what exactly that means?

Whether people listen or not, like him or not, believe in his politics or not, doesn't detract from the central point: the BBC has a duty to be impartial in its coverage. This should result in his dismissal.

completely different. first off brits are westernised so they don't need integration into society. secondly as members of the EU we share information when immigrants travel. spain will know exactly who the brits are who go to spain - criminal records and the like.
syrian immigrants could easily be ISIS members. ISIS even said they will use this immigration to europe wave to spread terror by sending jihadis here. One was spotted in calais recently. One was spotted in Italy also - and those are the ones we knew about.
Theres probably 100s in europe already who we have no idea they're terrorists.

Imo, there are things which are much more 'disgusting' then this. Like your hatred of anyone left leaning or anyone who doesn't hate refugees.