Is there such a thing as BJ buddy?

Genetically was designed to modify adverbially the adjective male; male was under the adverb's purview and not a lexeme nor phoneme more. I am not sure what the kids today are espousing regarding the genesis of sexual proclivities. I would, fastidiously, note that epigentics itself is a subset of genetics and is not taxonomically demarcated.

Yes, I did regretfully expunge the solecism. By way of mitigation; if posting on TSR after 2am then I'm probably in the grip of a (relatively) high-functioning somnambulance: any attempt at discourse beyond the reflexive one-line rejoinder is liable to basic parsing errors, and should be held to the same standard of epistemic rigour as automatic writing.

^^ Jesus Christ guys, do you have a thesaurus open next to your laptops or are you thinking of the longest synonyms possible to 'espouse' your thoughts?

Yes. Apparently, we pass it back and forth between posts.

^^ Jesus Christ guys, do you have a thesaurus open next to your laptops or are you thinking of the longest synonyms possible to 'espouse' your thoughts?

Genetically was designed to modify adverbially the adjective male; male was under the adverb's purview and not a lexeme nor phoneme more. I am not sure what the kids today are espousing regarding the genesis of sexual proclivities. I would, fastidiously, note that epigentics itself is a subset of genetics and is not taxonomically demarcated.

I am hesitant to delve too deeply into hermeneutics because, as you astutely noted, it presumes a degree of self-awareness which the OP does not necessarily have available to himself. However, I am tempted somewhat. It is possible that OP is a staunch advocate of feminist ideology and wishes histrionically to subvert the allegedly chauvinistic legalistic tradition of mono-pronominal gender neutrality. Alas, we shall never know.

BJ buddy does have a nice ring to it, though.

Yes, I did regretfully expunge the solecism. By way of mitigation; if posting on TSR after 2am then I'm probably in the grip of a (relatively) high-functioning somnambulance: any attempt at discourse beyond the reflexive one-line rejoinder is liable to basic parsing errors, and should be held to the same standard of epistemic rigour as automatic writing.

Don't see why a girl would not want to ****, but would want to suck a cock with no reciprocation.

If you're trying to find such a girl OP, and keep your relations to just that, then I'm afraid that won't happen unless you find a hooker.

I mean is there any guy that would be OK will eating a girl out and getting nothing in return, sex or otherwise? Probably not.

By definition, would this not be an exclusively homosexual practice? On the other hand, given the colour you chose for your car, I'm quite frankly surprised it took you even this long to broach the matter.

no reciprocation would rub me the wrong way tbh *no pun intended*.

Thats what I went for in the end. Grey with red interior. Looks hot

Technically speaking, "no reciprocation" wouldn't rub you at all. (Unless that was the pun?)


Surprisingly tasteful; although in terms of lean-yet-muscular, I can't but feel they've still yet to surpass this:

By definition, would this not be an exclusively homosexual same-sex practice? On the other hand, given the colour you chose for your car, I'm quite frankly surprised it took you even this long to broach the matter.