Your whole definition is not material, and I was not challenging it. I merely extracted the part (leaving it still coherent and logically correct) that illustrated how broad your definition is and how innocuous, commonplace and harmless Islamophobia must be if you use it.
No there won't. If you don't want to eat pig because of a pre-medieval mythology then fine, but you're not going to force the rest of us to live by your restrictions.
You watch this is a sign. No more pork, bacon or ham. Eat the real meat (chicken, lamb and beef)
Your whole definition is not material. I merely extracted the part (leaving it still coherent and logically correct) that illustrated how broad your definition is and how innocuous, commonplace and harmless Islamophobia must be if you use it.
Basically you sound smart inut but i don't know what you are talking about.
Firstly this thread is about Red Meat Not Religion so how about we actually talk about the topic of this thread
Secondly Sky News will Not stop me eating Bacon
Yes finally someone who has a brain. What if the government start putting bans on certain red meats and only a certain quantity is consumed until they fully ban or find a way around it
Yes finally someone who has a brain. What if the government start putting bans on certain red meats and only a certain quantity is consumed until they fully ban or find a way around it
The Government won't ban red meat , we are a country of freedom and individual liberty ( we can do and say ( and eat ) what we want ) . The government can offer recommend how much red meat to eat and how to cook it but ultimately will not ban red meat
I'm sorry. My words were intended to be understood by someone of the meanest intelligence. I obviously got that wrong.
What don't you understand?
I don't think a wide vocabulary is a measure of intelligence. Referring to a thesaurus every time you shoot a reply to someone isn't 'smart' by any means.
I don't think a wide vocabulary is a measure of intelligence. Referring to a thesaurus every time you shoot a reply to someone isn't 'smart' by any means.
Good for you. As it happens, I agree with both your points, though I do wonder why you have singled me out to tell me. I personally rarely consult a thesaurus. I'm unclear what words I have used in this thread you would consider to be part of an advanced or artificial vocabulary.
The Government won't ban red meat , we are a country of freedom and individual liberty ( we can do and say ( and eat ) what we want ) . The government can offer recommend how much red meat to eat and how to cook it but ultimately will not ban red meat
Not if it's causing cancer. Health and safety always comes first
Not if it's causing cancer. Health and safety always comes first
No it doesn't, at least not to the extent of banning its consumption. Tobacco and alcohol are far more dangerous than processed and red meat, yet they are not banned.
No it doesn't, at least not to the extent of banning its consumption. Tobacco and alcohol are far more dangerous than processed and red meat, yet they are not banned.
Don't act dumb, new laws are being implemented like smoking is illegal with a 5yr or under in car etc
I did think this thread was stupid at first, then when listening to the news I realised them say processed meat which is yano.. different to just "bacon".
And considering it is from the WHO there is bound to be at least some merit to this.
Fun Fact - studies show that 100% of life forms on earth die. Fun Fact - studies show that the majority of people who have cancer have at some point in their lives eaten meat.