I don't really know. Wherever I've had it, haddock has always been a bigger portion, so I usually go for haddock. Another reason being that I can't find haddock everywhere while cod & chips is everywhere. For these reasons, I prefer haddock. In terms of taste, I can't really tell the difference.
I don't really know. Wherever I've had it, haddock has always been a bigger portion, so I usually go for haddock. Another reason being that I can't find haddock everywhere while cod & chips is everywhere. For these reasons, I prefer haddock. In terms of taste, I can't really tell the difference.
Im not too sure about the difference either. Your right about cod being everywhere. Even in fish fingers. Have you tried scampi and chips?
Apparently battered fish originates from France, they deep fried it in batter and then peeled all the batter off so they were left with delicately cooked fish.
Apparently battered fish originates from France, they deep fried it in batter and then peeled all the batter off so they were left with delicately cooked fish.
Then I'm guessing they cooked it for the Brits and, us being the hard bastards we are, said "Nahhh mate, leave it on, we'll eat the lot".