The Student Room Group

What exercise to do to gain muscle mass/weight?

Scroll to see replies

Reply 40
Original post by WoodyMKC
This part is very true. Must add though that it's not only this but also volume/intensity-of-effort balance - you can do a 30 set workout, you can do a 12 set workout, either will work if you train according to volume, i.e. you're going to have to put more effort into your sets and go closer to complete muscular failure the less volume you do, but if you can do that, you don't need much volume.

I do always stand by the idea that you're better off going higher into the moderate rep range to build muscle, but if you don't build your strength as well, it's not gonna work either way. People are always asking me for tips on how to make their arms bigger - they're all probably prepared for a specific program that's been the ticket to my gains, or the old "I was told just do compounds and my arms will grow" which I think is BS, if you're training to build muscle and your arms are taken to failure from compounds alone then you're doing them wrong, they should only be assisting the main muscle. On the other hand, I don't do anything special for arms - I've merely just made an effort to get them stronger. Even when people add in arm isolations to their routine, they just tack them on the end, get a pump and it's job done they reckon, but IMO any exercise added is worth doing properly or you might as well not do it. You should be making just as much of an effort to get stronger on arm exercises as you should a bench press or a squat. First thing I ask is, how much are you curling or lifting on skullcrushers? The answer is never impressive. I started out curling 30kg, now I'm curling 60kg. I'm eating to grow, I'm being strict with my form to isolate the muscle and I'm giving it enough work to stimulate growth - it has to grow, simple as.


Tbh, I advocate a mixture of all rep ranges and varying intensity etc. The programming is more complicated, and a novice can keep it simple with similar results if they want, but whatever. Some days I'll have a heavy 6x6 (I dunno why I picked 6!) squat day, or a high rep deadlift day, or whatever. For me, it's about ingraining that technique. I'm heavily focused, no phone, no music in my ears, I'm just worrying about every single rep and my form on that. I do some sets where I do AMAP (as many as possible) without going to total failure, so if my form starts to break down, I stop. I just incorporate all of this. If you're hitting overhead press, bench, rows, chinups, deadlift, like I do, your arms will grow. Sure, they won't be as big, but they'll definitely grow noticeably. At the end of the day, I don't have the discipline to come to the gym every day and do the same sh*t, so I've structured my program to eventually lead up days where I'm hitting out triples or singles. I still consider myself a novice. None of my lifts are above 200kg yet. Lots of weakness that needs to be addressed.
Original post by JD1lla
Tbh, I advocate a mixture of all rep ranges and varying intensity etc. The programming is more complicated, and a novice can keep it simple with similar results if they want, but whatever. Some days I'll have a heavy 6x6 (I dunno why I picked 6!) squat day, or a high rep deadlift day, or whatever. For me, it's about ingraining that technique. I'm heavily focused, no phone, no music in my ears, I'm just worrying about every single rep and my form on that. I do some sets where I do AMAP (as many as possible) without going to total failure, so if my form starts to break down, I stop. I just incorporate all of this. If you're hitting overhead press, bench, rows, chinups, deadlift, like I do, your arms will grow. Sure, they won't be as big, but they'll definitely grow noticeably. At the end of the day, I don't have the discipline to come to the gym every day and do the same sh*t, so I've structured my program to eventually lead up days where I'm hitting out triples or singles. I still consider myself a novice. None of my lifts are above 200kg yet. Lots of weakness that needs to be addressed.


Fair enough. I'm the opposite tbh, I'm so regimented :lol: I generally train on upper/lower type splits training each muscle twice a week, though I'm doing push/pull atm which I'm quite enjoying, same sorta thing but just switched round a bit. I've been into the Dorian Yates training style for a good while now, nearing on a couple of years. I've got my spreadsheet, that says for each exercise, on my last workout I used this much weight for this many reps on my workset - today, I do one more rep. I go to balls-to-the-wall failure, grunting, grinding, the last rep takes 5+ seconds normally, the form is strict still but I'm really pushing against the sticking point with everything I've got. I've always stuck to the DY style of any warmup sets as needed (if any, depending on where the exercise is in the workout) and then one set to total failure followed up by an intensity technique to take the set beyond failure - be it a dropset, cheat reps/ extra negatives, partials etc. Atm I'm experimenting with more ramp-up sets and done away with the set-extender to see how it goes, but the above approach served me very well.

My weakness has always been pushing movements tbh due to rotator cuff problems. Getting stronger since I stopped freeweight benching for a while, I think those types of exercises were aggravating it. Using Hammer Strength press machines now and I'm still gaining on my chest, and my strength on overhead pressing movements is coming leaps and bounds atm.
Original post by theone2498
looool of course its possible without fapping but it will be much easier without it, thats for sure.


Is it? What's the reasoning and science behind this, I'm intrigued :tongue:
Reply 43
Original post by WoodyMKC
Fair enough. I'm the opposite tbh, I'm so regimented :lol: I generally train on upper/lower type splits training each muscle twice a week, though I'm doing push/pull atm which I'm quite enjoying, same sorta thing but just switched round a bit. I've been into the Dorian Yates training style for a good while now, nearing on a couple of years. I've got my spreadsheet, that says for each exercise, on my last workout I used this much weight for this many reps on my workset - today, I do one more rep. I go to balls-to-the-wall failure, grunting, grinding, the last rep takes 5+ seconds normally, the form is strict still but I'm really pushing against the sticking point with everything I've got. I've always stuck to the DY style of any warmup sets as needed (if any, depending on where the exercise is in the workout) and then one set to total failure followed up by an intensity technique to take the set beyond failure - be it a dropset, cheat reps/ extra negatives, partials etc. Atm I'm experimenting with more ramp-up sets and done away with the set-extender to see how it goes, but the above approach served me very well.

My weakness has always been pushing movements tbh due to rotator cuff problems. Getting stronger since I stopped freeweight benching for a while, I think those types of exercises were aggravating it. Using Hammer Strength press machines now and I'm still gaining on my chest, and my strength on overhead pressing movements is coming leaps and bounds atm.


What're your squat/bench/ohp/deadlift lifts?

I'm deadlifting 3x a week, I can't have the same approach to grind it out each session as I'm cutting. One way ticket to snap city :P
Original post by WoodyMKC
Is it? What's the reasoning and science behind this, I'm intrigued :tongue:


Could literally link a million articles lol, just google 'no fap' or 'benefits of no fap'
Original post by JD1lla
What're your squat/bench/ohp/deadlift lifts?

I'm deadlifting 3x a week, I can't have the same approach to grind it out each session as I'm cutting. One way ticket to snap city :P


Deadlifting 3x a week :redface: madness, I hope you know what you're doing haha
Reply 46
Original post by theone2498
Deadlifting 3x a week :redface: madness, I hope you know what you're doing haha


Why is that madness
Original post by theone2498
Could literally link a million articles lol, just google 'no fap' or 'benefits of no fap'


Have indeed, couldn't find anything that suggests why it'd be so beneficial to gaining muscle. I'm not looking very hard admittedly, but I see nothing apart from a nod towards increased testosterone which should lead to increased gains. I think this whole theory is way overcooked anyway tbh, if levels of natural testosterone were in proportion to the amount of mass gainable then adolescents that take up lifting, due to the fact that they have very high testosterone levels, should all be making steroid-level gains - clearly not the case. Natural testosterone simply doesn't have as much of an effect on muscle mass gain as people like to make out or the same as an equivalent dose of synthetic testosterone.
Original post by JD1lla
What're your squat/bench/ohp/deadlift lifts?

I'm deadlifting 3x a week, I can't have the same approach to grind it out each session as I'm cutting. One way ticket to snap city :P


Sod that :lol: It's hard to say tbh as I don't really do them, just variants of. Barbell benching I gave up ages ago; switched to dumbbells and noticed better chest gains so stuck with them, got up to 40kg dumbbells but my rotator cuff problems were really holding me back there. Stopped doing them a while ago and using the uni-lateral machines as stated above.
Never really done OHPs, Arnold presses have always been my go-to and I've made huge improvements in my shoulder size since starting them, I do dumbbell shoulder presses too occasionally which I can currently do 40kg a shoulder on since giving up freeweight benching and having a less aggravated rotator cuff.
I've never been into full deadlifts, much prefer rack pulls. As I said I split my body into two sessions and there's always overlap if you do full deadlifts unless you're doing proper full body workouts, which I'm not. Whereas with rack pulls it's just the top part of a deadlift, using heavier weight and putting all the work onto the back, so overall it's a more effective back workout and I can train legs separately. I have no idea how much I'd truly be able to lift with these since I do them at the end of my back work, if I did them at the start and using what I know would be well upwards of 300kg I'd not have the energy to then go and finish the rest of my workout.
I've always gone light on squats and then heavy on leg press so don't know what I'm really capable of there, a calculator would suggest I'd be using 200kg for heavyish sets but it's probably inaccurate. Gonna start switching round anyway and going heavy on squats and then lighter on leg press soon so I'll soon find out :biggrin:
Reply 49
Original post by WoodyMKC
:lol: Sorry ivy but from personal experience, I wholeheartedly disagree. I never really did any type of 5x5 or strength routine myself (tried it for 6 weeks after already lifting for about a year I think, but I got bored and wasn't impressed). From day one I was doing a warmup set followed by two sets to failure in the 6-10 rep range for every exercise, doing 2-3 full body workouts a week to start with. It was a dumbbell only routine though so all freeweight exercises, mostly compounds too of course. But BBing has been my focus from the start, I've made better progress than most people around me in that respect and I'm pretty strong too :wink:


Hmmm. Honestly, there's nothing magical about BB split nor is there anything magical about SS. Your muscle only breaks down so fast and rebuilds so fast. Actually considering the BB principle of high volume with SS you hit body 3x a week as opposted to split you hit a body group 2x a week. Undoubtedly SS is one of fastest way to put on muscle for a beginner.
Reply 50
Original post by Squats and milk
What program did you run? I'm curious since these programs are linear progression, not some sort of peaking or periodised program, so there shouldn't be a 4 week timescale.


I got it from some random website :lol:

Spoiler

Reply 51
Original post by JD1lla
What was the 'starting strength' program you undertook?

Starting Strength is a program of longgg history, and Mark Rippetoe wrote a book about it. The original program was written by Bill Starr (could be wrong here)

Anything other than the programs written here http://startingstrength.wikia.com/wiki/FAQ:The_Program

are not Starting Strength.

What you are saying is "I've got an iPhone, it's not made by Apple, but it's still an iPhone. Maybe the iPhone you bought from Apple is BS"
See the analogy?


Yeah thats the one I used, by Mark Rippetoe
Original post by ivy.98
Hmmm. Honestly, there's nothing magical about BB split nor is there anything magical about SS. Your muscle only breaks down so fast and rebuilds so fast. Actually considering the BB principle of high volume with SS you hit body 3x a week as opposted to split you hit a body group 2x a week. Undoubtedly SS is one of fastest way to put on muscle for a beginner.


It's all about volume:frequency balance. You might hit a muscle less often with a split (often only once a week) but you create a greater growth stimulus. I personally don't think hitting a muscle once a week is optimal for natural/drug free trainees, but at the same time I don't believe that training every muscle in one workout allows for as much of a focus on stimulating growth in particular areas once you get a bit more advanced and start moving heavier loads.

I did indeed train full body 3x a week as a beginner and do agree it's a fantastic approach, but I absolutely know that a purely strength-focused routine is simply not needed. Growth stimulation first, progressive overload to ensure continued progress, and I honestly believe that if you want to gain muscle then train on a more bodybuilding focused program. As long as it's a decent program then your approach and effort facilitates progressive overload/strength gains. As I said, I trained on bodybuilding styled routines from day one and if you look at statistics of average growth in male trainees on an effective diet and training regime, I've exceeded them. Could put it down to genetics, but I truly believe the fact that I focused heavily on stimulating the muscle rather than just simply moving weight has really helped.
Original post by ivy.98
I got it from some random website :lol:

Spoiler


That website is gimmicky, they have changed it to say 4 weeks to draw in the folk who are looking for a magical quick fix. That program is meant to be run for months until progress stalls, not for just 4 weeks!
Original post by WoodyMKC
It's all about volume:frequency balance. You might hit a muscle less often with a split (often only once a week) but you create a greater growth stimulus. I personally don't think hitting a muscle once a week is optimal for natural/drug free trainees, but at the same time I don't believe that training every muscle in one workout allows for as much of a focus on stimulating growth in particular areas once you get a bit more advanced and start moving heavier loads.

I did indeed train full body 3x a week as a beginner and do agree it's a fantastic approach, but I absolutely know that a purely strength-focused routine is simply not needed. Growth stimulation first, progressive overload to ensure continued progress, and I honestly believe that if you want to gain muscle then train on a more bodybuilding focused program. As long as it's a decent program then your approach and effort facilitates progressive overload/strength gains. As I said, I trained on bodybuilding styled routines from day one and if you look at statistics of average growth in male trainees on an effective diet and training regime, I've exceeded them. Could put it down to genetics, but I truly believe the fact that I focused heavily on stimulating the muscle rather than just simply moving weight has really helped.

I think it's also down to genetics. Some people like myself don't need more than 2-6 sets a week on the basic lifts to make significant muscle gains, some people need more volume and isolation exercises. I have just focused on increasing my squat, bench, deadlift, ohp and chinups, for 8 years, and I have experienced better muscle growth using that 'strength' approach than everyone in my gym that uses a 'bodybuilding' approach.
Reply 55
Original post by Squats and milk
I think it's also down to genetics. Some people like myself don't need more than 2-6 sets a week on the basic lifts to make significant muscle gains, some people need more volume and isolation exercises. I have just focused on increasing my squat, bench, deadlift, ohp and chinups, for 8 years, and I have experienced better muscle growth using that 'strength' approach than everyone in my gym that uses a 'bodybuilding' approach.


Pretty much all you need for great strength/physique.

I've just got a power band to help me with my chinups. Takes so much strain out of my wrist (tendonitus).

I'm doing them mainly as a bicep exercise, deadlifting 3x a week so whatever back development I get from chins, great. I'm still figuring out a way to incorporate rows. I might not even include them tbh. I got hammer curls too, they don't hurt my wrists like normal curls to.
Original post by Squats and milk
I think it's also down to genetics. Some people like myself don't need more than 2-6 sets a week on the basic lifts to make significant muscle gains, some people need more volume and isolation exercises. I have just focused on increasing my squat, bench, deadlift, ohp and chinups, for 8 years, and I have experienced better muscle growth using that 'strength' approach than everyone in my gym that uses a 'bodybuilding' approach.


I'm not a big volume guy myself tbh. As I said in this thread and several members are aware of already, I'm a big fan of Dorian Yates training methods. No ****ing about, only as many warmup sets as are needed, then one set to balls-out failure and beyond with a set-extender and the job is done, that muscle is done, train it again in four days, which for me also adds up to 2-6 sets per muscle per week.
I mostly stick to the basics as well, I throw in some little extras that I feel make a noticeable difference but my setup, split over two workouts (push/pull atm) is bench variant, OHP variant, chins, rows, rack pulls, squats and arms. 3 years into my training and I have a FFMI of just over 23. so there's not really much further I can go without turning to drugs at some point.
Original post by theone2498
just google 'no fap' or 'benefits of no fap'


Step aside, Pubmed! Nowadays we can find scholarly research by simply searching Google for "benefits of no fap."

Quick Reply

Latest