Muslim woman in Hijab pushed into a moving train by a man in London

Allows her to wear it? You mean forces her to wear it? If a woman has to wear a cumbersome item of attire that men do not (on the basis that a husband doesn't want other men "looking at my woman" ) then you clearly have an example of sexism there. If you treat men and women differently, in a way that places greater encumbrance on the woman, then it is sexist

You're comparing women to small children? Can't think for themselves and must be told what to do? I rest my case.

What do you mean it's not being publicised? We're discussing it now. This crime has attracted widespread attention on twitter and the Islamic blogosphere

i can't believe this is priority in your life.
Again if this was a Muslim man craxy or drunk doing this to muslim woman the public would not care about the person who released the footage, in fact they would appreciate it.

Unquestionably a shocking/appalling, not to mention shameful/un-British, act but perhaps just one example, I'm afraid, of the tens of thousands of annual instances of members of 'majority' groups in the West snapping under the pressure of multicultural societal conditions that have developed in relation state enforced mass inter-civilizational displacement for which no leader has ever received a political mandate. This is not the first such outrage and will not be the last until Western leaders have a rethink in the light of known facts of life re: identity, fear, prejudicial human nature, and The Clash of Civilisations

Yes this is the first one only affects 1 person the second affects us all. Which is more important to you?

The crime has been dealt with now we have to deal with massive breach of public trust

this is not on the bbc
this is the student room. what publicity is this???

What's even more disgusting is those one this thread trying to justify it just because they dislike Muslims

It's because you are. On the other thread, you started babbling about your Call of Duty fantasies and making factually incorrect claims like that the Kurdish Sinjar offensive started from west of the town when in fact most of the troops came over Mount Sinjar from the north.

I'm concerned that your posts often consist almost entirely of strawmen and baseless theories.

You'll have to point out where I excused either. I called the person who blamed the woman crazy, and I called this a terrible crime. You seem to be excusing the tendency of some far leftists and Islamists to label any random crime against Muslims as part of some Western conspiracy against Muslims, or evidence that society is overwhelmingly racist against them in violent/oppressive ways

I must have missed the comments saying "It's ok to push a woman into a moving train because she's a Muslim and I don't like them".

Perhaps you could either link to the several comments that express that sentiment, or retract your accusation for being no more than the usual baseless, mud-slinging, faux victimhood.

what? what is affecting us all exactly?

Islamophobia on this site is rife, so let's not get ahead of our selves. There's always more than one person hating on Muslims just like on previous thread

No. What's rife on this site is a double standards, faux victimhood sense of entitlement.

When people call Islam an oppressive, discriminatory, divisive and violent ideology, they are not "hating on Muslims". They are criticising an ideology.
An ideology can be analysed and criticised as an entity.
Remember that Muslims, like everyone else, are individuals and should be judged on their words and actions. If they state that they specifically support the violent, oppressive, divisive and violent passages, then they can also be criticised as individuals. It's still not "hating" though. There is more a sense of sadness, despair and pity.

I think the concept of "hating" those that are different is very much restricted to the followers of extreme ideologies, whether they be religious or political, engendered by the "us and them" philosophy that they usually promote.

Victimhood? I'm not even a Muslim myself,but Muslims who are attacked and ridiculed on a daily basis because of what they choose to wear or believe in are the real victims.

In my follow up, I put to you whether HW47 was more strategic to IS or the Kurds but you didn't reply.

And I have already expressed my concerns that you do not seem to think any contrary view can possibly be correct.

Reducing this abhorrent crime of attempted murder to "crazy old man"

apparent condoning by certain users as "one user" are terms used to excuse and justify the behaviour of people of a certain view but which are standard for them

So, was that a "No, I can't link any comments to support my claim"?

The real victims are, indeed, those who face real persecution and violence for what they are. However, claiming that people are justifying this attack because the victim is a Muslim is clearly untrue and is no doubt meant to build on the sense of "victimhood" that is common in some circles.

Muslims, as a rule, are not "attacked and ridiculed on a daily basis because of what they choose to wear or believe", and to claim that they are is disingenuous.

Islamophobia on this site is rife, so let's not get ahead of our selves. There's always more than one person hating on Muslims just like on previous thread

Now you're just saying random things.

Everything Islam related always seems to get hate(threads),when you actually read some of the posts you can tell it's usually an islamophobe because they're not afraid to express their views