So, Muslims, why won't you ever condemn terrorist attacks?

309 articles for gaza yet more than 13,000 articles for Paris...

Actually it is more than 309 you should have kept scrolling. There are pages and pages.

So you have been proven wrong on all accounts. People care about Gaza and the global media report on it.

And here is a story about both Gaza and Paris.

Oh. Well done for finding one article from Israel about Gaza. But how comes Facebook doesn't have the Palestine flag? Or Youtube? Why is there no 24/7 coverage of the situation. Your right, Gaza is mentioned. As a column, as corn on a cob, as a side-dish, as chips, as olives, as coleslaw. While France is presented as the main dish, the meat, the chicken.

What happened in Paris was an atrocity. But then again, the same thing happens on a larger scale in Gaza.

Probably because it is a constant and Facebook want to stay out of the political arena. Gaza is a political mine field. Same goes for Youtube and Google maps.who doesn't label Palestine. There is 24/7 coverage, if you ever watch BBC News channel it is mentioned almost everyday.

What has happened in France is an anomaly and has happened on our doorstep. Of course it is going to be heavily reported on by Western Media. This sort of thing is not expected in the civilised western nations and taken the lives of hundred and destroyed the families of thousands, some our fellow countrymen. Do you not think that it deserves to be reported on?

"but" is the point.
You accept that innocent people were killed in Paris (of course not relating it to Islam), but you don't accept that innocent people are killed by Palestinian terrorists. You are not ready just to express compassion, but start political trade. It's not surprise that almost 10% of Muslims in this poll support or don't condemn the Paris attack.

Let's show these trolls the strength of the Muslim response against Islamic terrorism, from individual young British Muslims to the largest Muslim organisations in the world.

Dunno, what your english grammar analysising skills are say

the Gaza Genocide.

You are simply thinking what you want to think of Muslims. You are just determined to think only the worse about them.

I have low level of English, but I don't lie.

And you are lying.

You continue use immoral propaganda comfortably escaping the number 10%.

What i find more scary is there are people on the poll that agree with with Paris attacks. how can they? 132 innocent people were killed. there are 132 families in mourning tonight for their children, brothers, sister and parents. And that is only now, this number keeps increasing. 350 people are injured in hospitals. Please tell me how this is a GOOD thing? I am at a complete loss as to how killing innocent people is a good thing. People who have never had anything to do with war or fighting, that were just eating at a restaurant or at a concert. Its scary. Why can't the world be nice to itself, why does it find that people must kill innocent people?

Is it so hard to just get along?

They are most probably trolls, or could be anti islam and saying they agree to make islam look even worse.

The scary thing is that even if these are trolls, there will still be people that agree with it. Even people that don't care either way are a little unnerving

Why do you presume that anybody who comments on the noticeable reluctance among a lot of Muslims to outrightly condemn these attacks and others is a troll? And why, while we're at it, do you assume that a TSR multiple-choice poll will be sufficient to disprove accusations that are fundamentally qualitative and not quantitative? I can think of quite a few users on this website who would vote 'I'm Muslim and condemn these attacks' but, from interactions that I've had with them, would actually say something like, 'Look, yesterday was a sad day across the world, not just Paris. There were attacks in Beirut and Nigeria too and let's not forget that the West funds terrorist groups that have destabilised the Middle East, hence causing these condemnable atrocities.' That, to me, reflects the most reluctant condemnation possible. This is actually a paraphrased version of a conversation I had with queen-bee yesterday and is clearly trying to deflect blame from IS to the maximum degree possible without either being on the fence or supporting it. It further asserts, on the basis of a bogus claim, that the West is somehow responsible for these attacks occurring, which is as close to apologising for IS as it gets in my view.

So while this is a valiant effort on your part to highlight the existence of the knee-jerk trolls who've been running amok on other threads, I'm afraid you've generalised and assumed a little too much to really contribute anything substantive to this issue. You may think you're some heroic anti-racist for opposing those groups of people that don't try to shake off the fact that this act was carried out by a religiously-motivated organisation, but I doubt you're going to get many reps from the more impartial TSR users.

Hey mate.
Would you say the West isn't responsible in any way (such as involvement in Middle East resulting in a backlash etc.)?

Have any underlying motivations been suggested for the attacks?

I agree that it is a political mine field. Its a mine field where innocent people get killed, just like they did in Paris. Yet, let's not go there because those people don't count since it's political over there. And no, there isn't 24/7 coverage on BBC. That is false. As I said before it gets mentioned as side news every week (since innocent people are dying every week) but its side-news. Something that we just know, but don't care about.

Exactly. You have said it, it happened on our doorstep, thats why we should care. I fully understand this. But please don't start talking about Humanity if you dont give the same coverage to Gaza and Lebanon. And are you saying that the people living in Gaza and Lebanon aren't civilized? Last time I checked, they eat food and go to the toilet and care for one another.