Are you sure...? By the time legal action is called for and the court intervene, they would probably have died... I would rather be sued for saving a life than losing one. I'm not 100% sure but if it is an urgent blood transfusion they do not have a lot of time. I thought that if a child was incompetent then you would turn to the family, but if they still refuse then you need to decide what is best for that patient (although family consent is very much appreciated)? Can someone else clarify what would happen in this circumstance? You could be right, but I've heard different
It is a matter of a judge signing a piece of paper rather than a full blown court case with jury, so it can be done very fast and just for reference you should avoid getting sued in general, just because you're saving a life doesn't mean anything because you're breaking the mum's consent without higher power allowing you to - this isn't like in med dramas where they're just like 'I'm gunna do the blood transfusion anyway!!! *wheels off patient to operating room by them self*'. While your duty is to your patient it is outlined by the GMC that a parent can give or take away consent if the child is underage or is lacking capacity, however if you feel that it is 100% necessary that the transfusion occurs in the immediate future you have to seek legal council as you do not have the authority to overrule it.
It is a matter of a judge signing a piece of paper rather than a full blown court case with jury, so it can be done very fast and just for reference you should avoid getting sued in general, just because you're saving a life doesn't mean anything because you're breaking the mum's consent without higher power allowing you to - this isn't like in med dramas where they're just like 'I'm gunna do the blood transfusion anyway!!! *wheels off patient to operating room by them self*'. While your duty is to your patient it is outlined by the GMC that a parent can give or take away consent if the child is underage or is lacking capacity, however if you feel that it is 100% necessary that the transfusion occurs in the immediate future you have to seek legal council as you do not have the authority to overrule it.
Edit: didn't realise it was over the phone for the legal action nor that you could do it without legal intervention first
Ok, I have a question: A patient who suffers from a chronic illness comes up to you (the doctor) and tells you he wants to undergo Euthanasia, how would you respond?
Although this one was mostly answered, I would also try to advice them on the end of life care and the choices they still have (which almost parallels voluntary passive euthanasia - such as DNR orders / rejecting certain medical interventions further donw the line) and palliative care where perhaps some of their problems could be addressed such as controlling their pain.
It is a matter of a judge signing a piece of paper rather than a full blown court case with jury, so it can be done very fast and just for reference you should avoid getting sued in general, just because you're saving a life doesn't mean anything because you're breaking the mum's consent without higher power allowing you to - this isn't like in med dramas where they're just like 'I'm gunna do the blood transfusion anyway!!! *wheels off patient to operating room by them self*'. While your duty is to your patient it is outlined by the GMC that a parent can give or take away consent if the child is underage or is lacking capacity, however if you feel that it is 100% necessary that the transfusion occurs in the immediate future you have to seek legal council as you do not have the authority to overrule it.
Ah, I do apologise, I was not aware that you just had to phone the court. I thought it entailed more involvement with them.
Haha, don't worry, being sued is not on my " to do" list! And please do not think that I base my ethical understanding on medical dramas (I don't actually watch any) - I find it rather patronising
Due to popular demand, we've made a table on our blog pages with updates about the interview process for ALL the university medical schools in the UK for the A100 course!
For each medical school, the table includes: - Whether they've sent out invitations to interview - When they started sending out invitations - Whether they've completed sending out invitations to interview - When they will finish sending out invitations - The style of interview, whether traditional or MMI
Due to popular demand, we've made a table on our blog pages with updates about the interview process for ALL the university medical schools in the UK for the A100 course!
For each medical school, the table includes: - Whether they've sent out invitations to interview - When they started sending out invitations - Whether they've completed sending out invitations to interview - When they will finish sending out invitations - The style of interview, whether traditional or MMI
Due to popular demand, we've made a table on our blog pages with updates about the interview process for ALL the university medical schools in the UK for the A100 course!
For each medical school, the table includes: - Whether they've sent out invitations to interview - When they started sending out invitations - Whether they've completed sending out invitations to interview - When they will finish sending out invitations - The style of interview, whether traditional or MMI
Ah, I do apologise, I was not aware that you just had to phone the court. I thought it entailed more involvement with them.
Haha, don't worry, being sued is not on my " to do" list! And please do not think that I base my ethical understanding on medical dramas (I don't actually watch any) - I find it rather patronising
Lol sorry, didn't mean to sound patronising :P
I guess we both learnt something about the protocol in these situations which is helpful!
Due to popular demand, we've made a table on our blog pages with updates about the interview process for ALL the university medical schools in the UK for the A100 course!
For each medical school, the table includes: - Whether they've sent out invitations to interview - When they started sending out invitations - Whether they've completed sending out invitations to interview - When they will finish sending out invitations - The style of interview, whether traditional or MMI
Do you know whether it will take longer for under 18s to hear about interviews?
Hi there,
As far as we know, the largest difference occurs for undergraduate, and graduate entry applicants. Often universities go through one set (either undergrad OR grad entry) of applicants first, then process the second one afterwards.
If you are an undergraduate applicant, many other undergrad applicants will be in their final year of school, so lots of students will be 17 still.
We'd recommend you try giving the admissions offices of the medical schools you applied to a call, to double check.