No it doesn’t, it just doesn’t deal with it and, yes, may enhance this problem in the short-term (e.g. in the absence of other, similarly drastic domestic policies)
Elements of our mixed economy have come to rely on immigration too heavily as it is. Plus, this begs the question: just how divided must society become/how many innocents must be raped/murdered before action is taken?
You’re assuming that we would profile emigrants on the basis of self-declared religious affiliation alone
Apparently not, unless you’re Belgium, in which case taking action means passively 'monitoring' a ghetto that has become a veritable hotbed of Islamic extremism and closing down your city centre out of fear. These beardy militant types must be having a good old chuckle. Europe is a ****ing shambles
It took just 0.001% of those Syrians in Europe to effect the attacks in Paris
No-one would dispute that. Fact remains: we have major problems with Islamism, and non-integrating Muslims, in the West. The fact a group like ISIS kills a lot of Muslims out East does not negate these facts, nor our right to demand something is done about the situation
Hence,
IslamismAn alarming proportion of Muslims support the actions of Islamic terror groups, I’m afraid (as per the stats in
my OP)
It’s not necessary, for sure, but it does help (particularly where more militaristic terrorist operations [e.g. ‘domestic insurgency’] are concerned)
Oh well, that’s ok then
Many are, but few are openly, most knowing the importance of ‘doing the decent thing’. The problem is (quite obviously) not just with the doctrine, but with interpretation and adherence. Pick another straw man
Many have, many haven’t
Think again (see
my OP for reference)
I’m afraid there is, as noted in
this postUnfortunately not. Limited respect/toleration is insufficient ‘integration’ e.g. they are duty bound to hold the law of Allah higher than any secular laws of the
‘kafir’, and a large proportion are not interested in
fully integrating, never mind assimilating; indeed, to do so would be haram
Not where militant Islamists are concerned – the 1st generation immigrants have gone about their business relatively peacefully, whereas their offspring, and some converts, have been the ones who have tended to hit the headlines
Correct. Several of the Paris bombers entered e.g. as ‘refugees’, from Syria, in recent months/years. European leaders/authorities have been extremely negligent and they have blood, and will most certainly have
more blood, on their hands. Meanwhile, in the UK, Cameron was pressured into declaring we’d accept 20,000 Syrians, and yet imbecilic lefties demanded yet more. It beggars belief