The Student Room Group

Physics exam 2016 january ( 19/01/2016)

so guys if your doing this exam share thing and lets discuss the exam >>>

good luck for u all

Scroll to see replies

reserved
reserved once more
@danr2


From jan 2013:

Nuclear fission can lead to a chain reaction by:

-Nucleus splits.
-Releases nuclei.
-Which are absorbed by different nuclei.

This process releases energy in the form of kinetic energy of the products.

Pressurised water acts a coolant.

Moderator slows down the neutrons.


Energy transfers in a power station:

Heat energy is released by a moderator >>> Thermal energy in water/steam >>> Kinetic energy in generator >>> Electrical energy in wires.
Reply 4
Original post by Mihael_Keehl
reserved once more


what is reversed?
Reply 5
Original post by Mihael_Keehl
@danr2


From jan 2013:

Nuclear fission can lead to a chain reaction by:

-Nucleus splits.
-Releases nuclei.
-Which are absorbed by different nuclei.

This process releases energy in the form of kinetic energy of the products.

Pressurised water acts a coolant.

Moderator slows down the neutrons.


Energy transfers in a power station:

Heat energy is released by a moderator >>> Thermal energy in water/steam >>> Kinetic energy in generator >>> Electrical energy in wires.


thanks!!! do you knoww of any picture of the moderator being labeled?
Original post by danr2
what is reversed?


Lol I meant I was reserving those posts for myself :biggrin::biggrin:

Nothing physics related :wink:
Original post by danr2
thanks!!! do you knoww of any picture of the moderator being labeled?


nope will let you know tho.
Reply 8
Original post by Mihael_Keehl
Lol I meant I was reserving those posts for myself :biggrin::biggrin:

Nothing physics related :wink:


oh ok haha.. first time i have come across this on tsr:biggrin:
Original post by danr2
what is reversed?


for a graph of current against voltage what goes on the x and y axes?
Was sweet
Reply 11
Original post by Mihael_Keehl
Was sweet
good

there were 2 q about efficncy right ?

i got for first one 899 you ?

and the second 899 divided by 72 then x 100 i got 1280 something like that and you ?
Original post by WhiteX
good

there were 2 q about efficncy right ?

i got for first one 899 you ?

and the second 899 divided by 72 then x 100 i got 1280 something like that and you ?


I got 899 too.

The second was to divide by 0.72 but I did get a value like that.
Original post by WhiteX
so guys if your doing this exam share thing and lets discuss the exam >>>

good luck for u all


How did you find it?!
Reply 14
Original post by Mihael_Keehl
I got 899 too.

The second was to divide by 0.72 but I did get a value like that.

so you got something that less than 6000 ?

and what about the hooks law i saied no because its reached a elastic lemits and it will not return to it original shape is it right ?
Reply 15
Original post by Heidiludwigg
How did you find it?!


it was a good paper u ?
Original post by WhiteX
so you got something that less than 6000 ?

and what about the hooks law i saied no because its reached a elastic lemits and it will not return to it original shape is it right ?


didnt obey.

But you could have said it did.

I said gradient not constant, gradient not a straight line, tested 2 points out from load and unload to show that k was not constant/equal.

Idk because it never went past its breaking limit.
I thought it was a bit ****!! It was alright but some of the questions were conditional, like when it said about how far the planets could be away fro each other, but didn't tell you the diameter of the star so yeah it was alright but little things like that thre me off I found chemistry a lot better
Original post by Heidiludwigg
I thought it was a bit ****!! It was alright but some of the questions were conditional, like when it said about how far the planets could be away fro each other, but didn't tell you the diameter of the star so yeah it was alright but little things like that thre me off I found chemistry a lot better


The greatest distance was the sum.

The smallest distance was the difference.

I found chem a lot harder personally.

Nice comet question, which I had done the night before :wink:
Reply 19
Original post by Heidiludwigg
I thought it was a bit ****!! It was alright but some of the questions were conditional, like when it said about how far the planets could be away fro each other, but didn't tell you the diameter of the star so yeah it was alright but little things like that thre me off I found chemistry a lot better


i wrote 150 m for the first one the scond also 150 any one the same ?

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending