Would you allow your 15 year old daughter to have sex in her room?

idk how I'll deal omg, I'm a slow one

Like I was flabbergasted when I found out my brother was growing pubic hair LOL, I'll be such an embarrassment when it comes to actual sexual stuff lol:

Read self-help books about parenting in the twenty years prior.

I'm already reserving the books in my local library catalogue

twenty years? More like 10, I want a child just before I hit 30 mate or maybe just after 30 idk

Allow ten years for the child to reach puberty, then leave to simmer for five minutes until pubes are tightly curled for maximal grossness.

Reading this makes me glad that my parents were easy to fool. Technophobe parents for the win.

haha no chance of fooling my mum. She doesn't miss anything! Even if I go to my room for a few minutes now she'll ask me what I'm doing.

This is going to be terribly long but if I may:

Are you being serious right now or is this a joke?
The funny thing is, until those agreeing with this actually have children- they're opinion on this matter will most likely change over time, I could bet on this with my whole life savings (though relatively small lol). But on a serious note, this sounds absurd to me. And the whole gender comment you're making, please explain that to me because a person's child is a person's child whether male or female. And though males can't get pregnant, they can still become fathers. If my son got a girl pregnant, he would need to face equal responsibilities as the girl he impregnated.

Can I just say also, just because most teens are having sex before university doesn't mean it justifies a parent allowing their child to have sex in their own home. I don't care if it's his/her's bedroom, the parent most likely pays for the home and takes care of the child as he/she can't even consent for themselves at that age.I can't imagine any parent saying 'hey I may as well allow this because most teens are having sex any way'??? Heck no. Though sadly there are parents who may actually think this way. Though I am not a parent yet, I could be one day I'd teach my child about independence, being an individual and not following the crowd.
If she/he said to me that they felt ready to have sex at fifteen, I'd ask them many questions to know why and to try to understand them.

Apart from sexual desire, what else? It's not sounding judgemental but it's being honest here. These are teenagers with raging hormones, experiencing puberty with brains still trying to develop and mature. At this stage, I hope my child would be more concerned with themselves in trying to build up their career for example while focusing on their education and trying to strive for excellence. They won't live with me forever, even if I wished this it's impossible because I will age and die one day. I hope that they will die after me. They need to understand that their focus should be on gradually being independent, saving, investing, setting goals such as by so and so time, I hope to have my own care or whatever they choose. Time is so important to me because it's precious and once gone, can't be gained completely back.
Sex will always be there, why so early, what is the rush?

What happened to just enjoying your childhood and enjoying the fact that you have relatively small or close to no real responsibilities. Sex isn't just this physical thing that you do where each time is it practised, you can be certain that the outcome with always be the same where both partners are emotionally, physically and mentally ok. I hope you understand what I mean. I mean that sex is also an emotional, intimate act. I'd want to be assured that my child is ready for sex emotionally and mentally.

The mental aspects are the reasons- he/she would need to tell me why. I'd be worried because I know peer pressure could be one of the reasons as it's something I face and faced even at that age. My friends are all having sex but me and sometimes it's isolating as I can't relate to some of the things they all talk about.
Peer pressure is a terrible reason to have sex because if you weren't pressured, your reasons could differ. At the age, I would want to know why bearing all of this in mind.
A lot of thought and discussion would need to go into this. It definitely won't be something I would agree with however I'd still want to respect my child and listen to him or her to try to understand. I don't believe in just diminishing a child's request... with love and care try to understand

And love? Really?
What do these mid teenagers really know about love? That word is so overused and used recklessly.
What is it that they have experienced to know about love? Listen, love is about sacrifice. Until they've experienced trials and troubles to where they had to sacrifice for the person they supposedly love is when it seems like love. Most likely it's LUST. Lust is fun, it's exciting but also selfish. Lust is taking and love is giving. So lust yes, love...I highly doubt it.

When I was fifteen, I can openly say all I wanted from a relationship really was lust. And some say it's a 'guy's things'. No, girls can also feel this way too. I didn't even really want a relationship to be honest, I just wanted someone to engage with in the sexual/ exciting things. It was just hormones, hormones, and day dreaming and fantasies.The thought of guys was exciting and it still is, being 18 hasn't really made everything different in actuality more difficult as now my childhood friends are doing the 'adult' stuff unlike before where we will all naive to these things haha. Iit definitely was not love.Heck what did I know? I was just finishing year 9 entering year 10 to prepare for my GCSEs. What experience would I have had to say I 'loved' a guy when I hadn't even experienced life properly yet- with the comfort of my parents.

What if she sees these posts you're making?

If she knew I was talking about her on the internet she'd most likely put me over her lap. I just have to hope she doesn't find it - I'm doing everything in private browsing anyway though so hopefully won't!

Seriously? At 17?

Good idea (private browsing, not corporal punishment).

erm yeah. It's been a few months since she last did but she would. She says smacking is the only thing that gets through to me. I guess it's true tbh and it's worked when I've done some bad things in the past and needed it. I have no problem with that - and it's better than being grounded for weeks - it's just that she's quite restrictive. I think it's a cultural thing, too - she's part-chinese and it's more common there. I think I've more or less grown out of it now, though. I'm nearly an adult.

So someone told me that she used to have sex with her boyfriend at 15 years old while her parents were home. And that sometimes he stayed over. In that moment i tried to imagine my own future daughter and I really really tried to be liberal and open minded and that but I gathered I can not in any ways allow my daughter to have sex in my house. I will probably go kill the boyfriend with a hammer and watch him die. I don't care that I'll go to prison or anything. Would you allow that to happen?

I hope you're gentler with your kids... Nobody should be smacked for speaking their mind on the Internet, child or not.

Your selfishness does not make the point irrelevant

Intercourse age should be changed to 18, although it's never enforced anyway...

Why 18? I'm 17 and I know what I'm doing when I have sex - nobody's taking advantage of me.

It's an irrelevant point because it's an obvious point.

Another option is to tell her to not have sex at all. If you do the right upbringing then they won't even have sex at 15. I believe chastity should be encouraged. In America, a 2001 study showed that 70% of women have not had sex before marriage obviously now it's much less than that but this shows that in a more conservative society with the right values such things will not happen. Such values you talked about only made us the country with the highest rate of teen pregnancy in Europe whereas US has waaaaaaaaay less pregnant teens than we do.

Perhaps go back and re-read what you just wrote

Why would a point be irrelevant just because it's obvious? And clearly not so obvious for some people considering a number of people have already quoted me on it saying how it was a good point made that they hadn't considered.