I have a few problems with how defensive people are on here, as if they're not even reading the arguments and just shouting 'la la la' with their fingers in their ears.
Islam is definitely intolerant, I mean this is not even up for debate. How can you say 'you can be gay, you just can't act on it'. What form of tolerance is that? How would you know if someone was gay otherwise? Just because it does not punish 'gay thoughts' does not make it tolerant, imagine being told you could think straight thoughts but you just couldn't act on it?
Secondly, as someone who never consumes any Murdoch media I can't see how they are are anti-Islam? Maybe anti-Muslim, which I believe is bigoted and wrong but not anti-Islam. If you want reasoning look up Richard Dawkins.
Thirdly, why not pick on other religions? I do not claim to be an expert on world religion but in terms of massive religions such as Christianity. If Christianity was still in the position it was in the middle ages, I would definitely have a problem with it as well. However with churches in England doing services for homosexual couples, the appointment of female Bishops. It is clear that Christianity is much more modern and subject to change.
How is Islam different from this? Well unlike the Bible which was written by man, Islam claims to be the infallible word of Allah, which means it can't change and it won't modernise. What is it about Christianity that makes it so clear as to not incite terrorist attacks yet everyone seems to keep misinterpreting the Quran?
The fault many make is only tackling arguments about terrorism, yes most terrorists are not Muslims but there are many other issues besides that.