scientific reasons for believing in god?

You have to have faith and believe in God even if there is no evidence, that is the test.

Most religious people accept that the Universe was caused by the big bang too. In fact, it was a catholic priest called Lemaître that first put forward the theory.

I don't think that there's any reason to thing of the big bang as the action of an omnipotent eternal being though.

How can you agree with him when you just mentioned one possible interpretation of quantum mechanics, especially when there are many that are deterministic, which would make his point invalid?

Posted from TSR Mobile

Science is a human invented phenomena

Yeah I know. I may even believe in it myself.

Regarding your second point: why not? Even Einstein believed in a sort of God.

Yeah I know. I may even believe in it myself.

No it wasn't. The Big Bang Theory did not exist until the twentieth century.

oh my actual days
it always existed cos it actually happened and it was mentioned in the quran i have seen it
@APPLICANT2016

You don't know the difference between the Big Bang and the BIg Bang Theory then?

big bang was described in the quran

This has been debunked countless times.

It means "shown to be nonsense".

The fact that our minds are impenetrable in that scientists can observe our bodies and our brains among other material substances but not our minds leads to the conclusion that there must be some immaterial substance (e.g. Our minds). The ideal conclusion would be a God but that can be used to argue for the existence of anything of the supernatural.

scientists can very much observe our "Minds" in the fact that scans can show what we are thinking about by which parts of the brain become active etc.

I don't think what Einstein believed is very important.

I just can't think why we should consider the big bang as the action of an omnipotent eternal being. Just because we don't know absolutely all the ins and outs of the event doesn't mean we should stuff a god into the equation.

You should really do more than believe it. You should accept it as a scientific fact. It's not really a question of faith.

Yes They can certainly observe what parts of the brain becomes active and compare this with peopl claiming to think certain things or perhaps with certain addictions. However, they can not directly observe and penetrate into our thoughts the way we could do perhaps with a piece of Iron for example. Only you can directly observe your thoughts, making them impenetrable. All we have to go by is behaviour, for example, someone having two direct mental experiences could have similar brain patterns but you wouldn't know. We could both dislike the taste of lemon but that taste to me might be very different to you. Hence, our minds are impenetrable and therefore immaterial giving the grounds for some sort of supernatural beyond the observable.

lol whatever fam

Quotes or it didn't happen please

Yes They can certainly observe what parts of the brain becomes active and compare this with peopl claiming to think certain things or perhaps with certain addictions. However, they can not directly observe and penetrate into our thoughts the way we could do perhaps with a piece of Iron for example. Only you can directly observe your thoughts, making them impenetrable. All we have to go by is behaviour, for example, someone having two direct mental experiences could have similar brain patterns but you wouldn't know. We could both dislike the taste of lemon but that taste to me might be very different to you. Hence, our minds are impenetrable and therefore immaterial giving the grounds for some sort of supernatural beyond the observable.