The Student Room Group

Field of Economics in a nutshell.



Economist 1: "Maybe we should rethink our models."

Economist 2: "Nah"

Scroll to see replies

Original post by ChaoticButterfly


Economist 1: "Maybe we should rethink our models."

Economist 2: "Nah"


I prefer Economic History.
Me : I agree! It's a stupid field

Also me: *continues to study it
Reply 3
that's austerity for you
"I can calculate the motion of heavenly bodies, but not the madness of people." - Isaac Newton
Original post by mangala
that's austerity for you


How dare we not continue spending.
Reply 6
Original post by Aceadria
How dare we not continue spending.


austerity > hurts poor working people
taxing the rich > they cant buy as many sports cars

so why do we have austerity instead of temporarily taxing the rich higher until the economy recovers?
Original post by mangala
austerity > hurts poor working people
taxing the rich > they cant buy as many sports cars

so why do we have austerity instead of temporarily taxing the rich higher until the economy recovers?


You're right, taxation solves everything. I mean look at what happened in France when Hollande tried to tax the rich. Swell.
Reply 8
Original post by Aceadria
You're right, taxation solves everything. I mean look at what happened in France when Hollande tried to tax the rich. Swell.


*completely ignores the collapse of greece because of austerity*
Original post by mangala
austerity > hurts poor working peopletaxing the rich > they cant buy as many sports carsso why do we have austerity instead of temporarily taxing the rich higher until the economy recovers?
Because the rich will go somewhere else, and we get NO tax from them


Original post by mangala
*completely ignores the collapse of greece because of austerity*


*completely ignores other reasons such as the debt Greece hid, bad employment practices, black economy, rapidly ageing population and generous pensions, ridiculously large public sector and corruption...*
(edited 8 years ago)

Spoiler



Lol I find these arguments kind of silly. Economics is not accurate at forecasting, yes, I think everybody agrees on that. The field attempts to predict decisions humans make predicated on the assumption that we are all rational. The problem with Economics is that we make a lot of assumptions in our models. But as the field develops and progresses are models ought to become more and more accurate. If everyone gave up now and didn't even try to further the field we won't be any nearer to better understanding our economy. Duh.
Reply 11
Original post by Mathemagicien
Because the rich will go somewhere else, and we get NO tax from them


we barely get tax from them anyway loooooooool
Original post by mangala
*completely ignores the collapse of greece because of austerity*


Economic History 101: there's more to the status quo than the last decade.
Original post by mangala
we barely get tax from them anyway loooooooool


Who fault is that? You can tax the rich £1 for every £1 they earn, it will make no difference as long as tax loopholes are around.
Original post by High Stakes

Spoiler


Lol I find these arguments kind of silly. Economics is not accurate at forecasting, yes, I think everybody agrees on that. The field attempts to predict decisions humans make predicated on the assumption that we are all rational. The problem with Economics is that we make a lot of assumptions in our models. But as the field develops and progresses are models ought to become more and more accurate. If everyone gave up now and didn't even try to further the field we won't be any nearer to better understanding our economy. Duh.


Economic History - the hint is very much in the name.
Reply 15
Original post by Mathemagicien
*completely ignores other reasons such as the debt Greece hid, bad employment practices, black economy, rapidly ageing population and generous pensions, ridiculously large public sector and corruption...*


its bad employees? it was a combination of the rich not paying tax and running a 200% deficit budget
Original post by Mathemagicien
Because the rich will go somewhere else, and we get NO tax from them


So your solution is to worship the ultra-wealthy and do everything possible to appease them? You seem to be advocating allowing the wealthy to bully the rest of society.
Reply 17
Original post by Aceadria
Who fault is that? You can tax the rich £1 for every £1 they earn, it will make no difference as long as tax loopholes are around.


the rich, because the rich run the country and have put /left those loopholes there
Original post by mangala
the rich, because the rich run the country and have put /left those loopholes there


Oh, dear. Do you use tesco value aluminium foil for your tin foil hat? You must because 'OMFGJUSUEROR THE RICHERZ ARE OUTZ TO GETS ME'.
Original post by Plagioclase
So your solution is to worship the ultra-wealthy and do everything possible to appease them? You seem to be advocating allowing the wealthy to bully the rest of society.


No, that is not my solution. I am stating a fact - tax them too much, and they will go somewhere else.

We need a minimum global tax on the rich

Quick Reply

Latest

Trending

Trending