The Student Room Group

Rotational Mechanics

Scroll to see replies

Original post by TeeEm
put up a solution and will check it

Not tried it just yet, but I will do later. It's just that the last line 'in terms of m and g' bothered me. Would there not have to be another length in there somewhere?
(edited 8 years ago)
Reply 21
Original post by A Slice of Pi
Not tried it just yet, but I will do later


yes there is a typo ... I checked in my written solution and I have 4/3 mga
Original post by TeeEm
yes there is a typo ... I checked in my written solution and I have 4/3 mga

I get this also
Reply 23
Original post by A Slice of Pi
I get this also


rotation.jpg
your mechanics is too good ...
here is my solution
Original post by TeeEm
rotation.jpg
your mechanics is too good ...
here is my solution


Neat and nice
thank you:smile:
Reply 25
Original post by depymak
Neat and nice
thank you:smile:


mine is supposed to be neat and nice....
"A Slice of Pi" is not ....
Original post by TeeEm
mine is supposed to be neat and nice....
"A Slice of Pi" is not ....


I meant yours (TeeEm)
Original post by TeeEm
we have to wait for the Mechanics master-kid .
(Hopefully I catch him !!!, as he looks unbeatable at the moment)

I get 4/3 mg (I could be wrong)


You are probably right. I misread your question - I thought that it said that there was a couple acting contrary to the torque generated by the falling mass - in fact, it's a frictional couple, so it can't be analysed the way I was going about it - you need an energy argument. (I also used h instead of 2h when calculating the final speed of the falling mass but that's trivial). I'll have to start taking more care with these questions.
Reply 28
Original post by atsruser
You are probably right. I misread your question - I thought that it said that there was a couple acting contrary to the torque generated by the falling mass - in fact, it's a frictional couple, so it can't be analysed the way I was going about it - you need an energy argument. (I also used h instead of 2h when calculating the final speed of the falling mass but that's trivial). I'll have to start taking more care with these questions.


I am giving up ...
A slice of pi made mince meat of this one too ...
Original post by TeeEm
I am giving up ...

Err, why? Confused.
Reply 30
Original post by atsruser
Err, why? Confused.


this A level kid does everything I throw at him ...
polars, intrinsic, rotations, variable mass ....
Original post by TeeEm
this A level kid does everything I throw at him ...
polars, intrinsic, rotations, variable mass ....

But why is that a bad thing?
(edited 8 years ago)
Reply 32
Original post by A Slice of Pi
By why is that a bad thing?


I am very busy in the next 2 days but I am making a question with a marble rotating inside a cone and moving up and down ....
Start revising ...
Original post by TeeEm
I am very busy in the next 2 days but I am making a question with a marble rotating inside a cone and moving up and down ....
Start revising ...


Fair enough, but as long as its next week because I'm not going to be able to do any maths this weekend as I have a fair bit of chemistry work to do...
Original post by TeeEm
this A level kid does everything I throw at him ...
polars, intrinsic, rotations, variable mass ....


I'm taking your questions too casually - trying to do them on scraps of paper while doing other stuff. I'm going to up my game from now on.
Reply 35
Original post by atsruser
I'm taking your questions too casually - trying to do them on scraps of paper while doing other stuff. I'm going to up my game from now on.


:biggrin:
Original post by TeeEm
:biggrin:


When it comes to me and your mechanics questions, Mr TeeEm, from now on, it's no more Mister Nice Guy.
Original post by TeeEm
this A level kid does everything I throw at him ...
polars, intrinsic, rotations, variable mass ....


Pi is an A-level kid?

Puts me to shame... :frown:

Spoiler

Reply 38
Original post by Mathemagicien
Pi is an A-level kid?

Puts me to shame... :frown:

Spoiler



so (s)he claims
Original post by atsruser
Am I being stupid?

Spoiler



Given someone has repped this, I ought to point out that the argument is wrong (I forgot about the jerk => inelastic) - you can see the correct approach further down the thread. (Conservation of AM to start with, which is always true, so we don't have to worry about elastic/inelastic processes).

Quick Reply

Latest