i don't want this to come accross as obnoxious or as the result of some self inflated ego because it really isn't , I'm not the kind of kid to expect stuff, but so far i have no uni offers from where id ever want to go (this is to study history). Durham was never like a massive dream of mine but i have always really liked the idea of possibly going there and i just got rejected and I'm still waiting to hear back from my last uni choice UCL. i understand there is more to it than just grades, and I'm sure my personal statement is quite commonplace. but i was just wondering if there are any other people who have applied for subjects with linear a levels (as in ones taken over 2 years) and have found that in any way more difficult, or that universities were more weary to them. I do Pre-U History so have all my exams at the end of this year, while the rest of my a levels are divided into the more typical AS and A2. i got 9 A* and 3 A's at GCSE and 3 A's at AS level in psychology, chemistry and economics and then i have my Pre-U history, i dropped chemistry and continued with history psychology and economics and i am predicted 3 A*. i promise this isn't some cry for attention or a fish for compliments, i just wanted some common reassurance that other people have this 2 year A level thing and they still got offers from the unis they wanted to go to, as i know Durham is extremely competitive and congrats to all those with offers. but if i wasn't to get an offer from Ucl than for me there is no point in getting into all that debt. so do you think it would just be best to apply next year with my actual grade in history rather than just having the last kinda reference or checkpoint in the subject all the way back at GCSE.