Women Protection Bill protested by religious leaders as 'un-Islamic'

There's a good bet that this thread will eventually be deleted, too.

"Freedom of speech"



It's great when they criticise western women calling them whores but when we do the reverse and called islamic women oppressed because of their religion, we get reported.

Nor is it beyond them to report posts that states what the Koran says.

I will wreak havoc on this site if it does

Seriously though there's absolutely no way a deletion of this topic can be justified even by TSR's standards.

Of course it can be justified by TSR's standards. The thread topic is almost irrelevant to the Islam-related threads that get deleted -- it's usually to do with the debate veering too far off-topic (again, by TSR standards) or becoming 'unconstructive' (before some I-Soc brownshirt considers reporting this for 'discussing specific moderation actions' -- this is from a post by a former moderator on a public thread, which I'm happy to link if required).

Try doing your own research without using wikiislam.

I'm not a racist but HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

An atheist using WikiIslam is no different to a Muslim using IslamQA, which I have seen many Muslims use as a reference source on TSR (perhaps even yourself?)

Every article on WikiIslam has links to the relvant Quran verses, hadith or sirah, just like IslamQA (and all the other similar sites).

I really fail to understand what the difference is supposed to be...unless it is the usual "Pro Islam=good. Anti-Islam=bad" argument.

It is interesting that sceptics feel comfortable use both sources as reference, whereas apologists will only use one. I wonder why that is?

I'm not a racist but

It's not a reference to race/skin colour.
It's a reference to the concerted efforts made by some members of the TSR I-Soc to get TSRians who are critical of their religion banned by mass-reporting their posts for minor offences. I'll stop there, though, before someone reports me for 'off-topic discussion.'

It's not a reference to race/skin colour.
It's a reference to the concerted efforts made by some members of the TSR I-Soc to get TSRians who are critical of their religion banned by mass-reporting their posts for minor offences. I'll stop there, though, before someone reports me for 'off-topic discussion.'

Maybe it's just my mind because i read Brownshirt as Brownsh*t

LMAO.

That may true, but ISOC's Islamic Freedom Army of Post-Reporting don't think in terms of that.

I agree, they seem to think freedom of speech is conservative code-word for we hate muslims or something.

Not a True Islamic State™

Posted from TSR Mobile

I agree, they seem to think freedom of speech is conservative code-word for we hate muslims or something.

Well, to be fair, freedom of speech is not a legal guarantee on a privately-owned website like TSR.

Well if Facebook and Twitter's decline is anything to go by, social media companies infringing on "speech" (based on feelings) usually ends up declining in terms of users...

However, I realise the demographic makeup of TSR users is different than FB/Twitter so the same principle cannot be applied with confidence.