Third class degree, what next?

Then you should realise that "lovely area" is the last thing anyone would use to describe it. That alone is the reason why I don't believe you.

But back on the establishment, for a RG uni, it's below average. For unis in the UK, it's decent. (just not worth the 9k a year when there are better unis asking for the same or lower grades. And for mechanical engineering it's relatively poor. Hence why i said getting a third in mechanical engineering at liverpool is a double loss

This guy got a third class degree and he did well in his career. Be positive.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/culturenews/10083081/I-was-proud-to-wear-uniform-of-Bullingdon-Club-admits-David-Dimbleby.html

You can't even use Unistats correctly. Click on the "more on employment and accreditation" link and it gives you a more detailed breakdown of what those who went into employment are doing.



It's not really. I think if someone has the word "engineer" in their job title it's a good indication of what they are working as.



Why?



Some did, as Unistats says, but most didn't.

Are you being serious or are you pretending not to understand?

Rankins do not measure how good a university is -

In this table, Greenwich is higher than LSE for economics.
http://www.theguardian.com/education/ng-interactive/2015/may/25/university-league-tables-2016#S360

Are you going to say that it is better than LSE and LSE ranks low?

.

Okay . I'm just going to leave you to talk rubbish to someone who cares.

.... are you purposely being an idiot or are you trolling? Please learn to read. I have said said times that if it's just one ranking it may not be significant. But every single UK ranking? That's not a coincidence. Greenwich isn't above LSE in every ranking in the UK.

Mech eng at liverpool however, is ranked badly in every ranking in the UK. International ones too. Please learn to read

The.Statistic.You.Posted.Doesn't.Look.At.Relevant.Sectors.

I don't know how many times i have to say it. The 90% or w.e you said about liverpool and 80% at Manchester met is employment everywhere. There may be a more detailed statistic somewhere, true. But the amount that go into graduate roles at Liverpool is NOT that high. It's not 90%. Please stop lying to everyone by posting this statistic. It's not 90% at any Uni in england.


And i now know there's no point of attempting to take you seriously. You don't need engineer in the title for it to be relevant. Where the hell did you get that from?

If you need me to explain to you why it doesn't take a simpleton to realise 80% of manchester ****ing metropolitan graduates go straight into mechanical engineering graduate jobs then clearly you're not intellectual enough to use this site. I recommend logging off and visiting 9gag.

And for the part you keep spamming in bold, I've already answered. Kill 2 birds with one stone. Look at the rankings where Liverpool has relatively poor ratings for mechanical engineering in ( aka all of them. I'm not even making this up) then look at what they used to assess the Unis. You can ignore international reputation.

I don't know why you're dragging this on. Every source agrees with me. Whatever the employment may be, as a faculty, mech eng is mediocre at Liverpool. There's no reason to go there when there's better options in better locations for lower grades and costs.

Ah, these knee-jerk reactions are hilarious. The only idiot here is you.

You linked the Guardian table to supposedly support your idiocy, thinking it will do you favours.

Okay then, let's play your game:
Another table -
http://www.thecompleteuniversityguide.co.uk/league-tables/rankings?s=Mechanical+Engineering

12- Herriot Watt
21- Swansea
...
26- UCL

Realise what an ignorant idiot you are now? Stop making a fool of yourself.

.

Lmfao. It seems like you're the one who didn't click the button since it agrees with me. 55% got jobs in the relevant engineering field. Not the big 90% advertised on the main unistat page.

What a suprise, I was right. The original stat is inflated as it shows all types of jobs.

No, you are still completely wrong. I said Liverpool MEng mechanical engineering graduates had a 100% employment/further study record (not 90% - read posts harder pls), of which 90% became engineering professionals. I quoted these figures from Unistats.

Not at all. Engineering is UCLs worst department. Just browse the engineering subforum on TSR if you don't believe me. You've only made yourself look even more retarded.

And for the 5th time, thatwas just an example. Every ranking agrees liverpool is relatively poor for engineering. Stop being assblasted. I can only assume you attend Liverpool Uni. There's no other reason you'd be this butthurt.

Don't argue with me. Go and email literally every ranking in the UK which claimed the course was poor.

No, you are still completely wrong. I said Liverpool MEng mechanical engineering graduates had a 100% employment/further study record (not 90% - read posts harder pls), of which 90% became engineering professionals. I quoted these figures from Unistats.

So, Swansea is better than UCL, even for engineering?

Why am I even wasting my time - when someone relies on rankings, it's obvious they don't know crap about universities, let alone employers. Go study for your GCSEs instead.

And no, I do not go to Liverpool - it's just your ignorance is astounding.

Yes. Second time I've linked this: http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showthread.php?t=3681013

And this is something I can tell you first hand, the only good engineering branch in UCL is civil. The rest are done poorly. For every other course, especially humanities, UCL is excellent and lives up to its reputation.

Please stop arguing with me about things you know nothing about

I dont think macdonalds would hire you, they need at least a 2:2

I think we should just leave him now.. The delusion has reached an upper bound limit.

Posted from TSR Mobile

I've literaly looked it up and seen that none of what you've said is true. Why do you continue to force this? And why are still arguing with me about this?

Ah you poor thing... why am I even bothering.

I'm done here.

It's ironic because you're the one justifying your point with rankings now. I've said this time and time again. A good uni doesn't mean every course in the said uni is good. Another example is aerospace engineering at bath. Good uni. But you don't even learn about anything directly plane related until 3rd year. There are quite a few unis worse than bath overall yet better than Bath at aerospace. Mech Eng at Liverpool and Chemical engineering at UCL are victims of this.

One day (maybe once you've finished your GCSE's) you'll wrap your head around this.

Peace.

I've pointed out that it doesn't specify where the jobs are too many times to take you seriously and continue replying. You're clearly not capable of asking what the information you're provided with means. Must be why you seem to think 80% of manchester metropolitan graduates go straight into mechanical engineering graduate roles.

I'm done here lmao