Isn't Cameron a good PM?

i think he is. the economy is good, and the coutnry isn't in wars that don't affect us.

The economy is improving because economies naturally go in cycles of boom and bust. The credit crisis was 8 years ago now so it's not surprising that we would be recovering by now. But arguably we are not recovering very effectively, because although employment and wages are slowly rising again, the benefits of the recovery are mainly going to rich people. Inequality is increasing and the people at the bottom are suffering.

And as for not being in wars which don't affect us, that's a very low bar to set for the status of being 'a good PM', it's not difficult to be a better PM than Tony Blair. Besides, David Cameron wanted to invade Syria, the only reason we are not at war there right now is because he was defeated in the vote.

A lot of people seem to make the mistake of attributing the current state of the country directly to the Prime Minister, when actually the Prime Minister has much less control over things like the economy than people think, and the control he does have is subject to a long delay: the state of development in things like healthcare, education and economics are more defined by the politicians of 10 years ago than those of today.

ISIS is a threat to the region. Saddam wasn't. Saddam had no WMDs, and i doubt we'll ever know if he did, or if he wanted to fire them at us.

ISIS didn't even exist in 2013, the target of our war would have been Assad, which would in fact have directly helped ISIS.

yes, it did. but it's pretty cool that you let cute girls off the hook for posting this, and not calling them "fools" but do to me..lol.. are you the "dude" or "badman"?

Post edited: they did exist but they were not yet considered a major threat. Anyway that's completely irrelevant to the point, since as I said the target would have been Assad not IS.

And I do not understand the rest of your post, what 'girls' are you talking about?

i laugh at you, since you have a phantom rule as to who can post what...lol....you like to project.

I still don't know what you are talking about, I saw this thread in the latest discussions tab and I replied to it, I have nothing against you nor indeed any idea who you are.

just calling you out....since you really believe i need to care about what you as some Web stranger has to say lolol....aspie.

he has the advantage of the being the first PM in the social media age.

He's a pure pragmatist and I admire that. He's perceived as a strong statesman and I think he's decent at PMQs. All the same qualities as Blair.


Other than that no.

He's a PR man. He's brilliant at speaking and sounding statesmanlike, just like blair. Although he doesn't share Blair's concerns for the poor or public services.

Posted from TSR Mobile