I'm fed up with the daily mails islamophobia and racism

The daily mail is constantly publishing anti refugee or anti muslim articles like this one to try and portray all muslims as barbaric savages. Despite the fact these muslims are a small minority of extreme shia (like president Assad who the mail supports), they are trying to stir up trouble against the muslim population as a whole which is why the UK is becoming such a racist uncomfortable place to be recently.

Additionally their rhetoric about the refugees has made the attitude in this country to the greatest humanitarian crisis since World war two disgusting. They generalise all refugees as rapists and Jihadis just because of a few bad apples and for some reason seem to believe that because some refugees are male they are cowards and for some reason incapable of fleeing Assads barbarity.

A combination of these two factors has made it so the UK has not had a serious response to the refugee crisis making the plight of these poor people even worse. I am fed up with this rag and think it should be banned for inciting hatred, anyone else agree?

The DM is so obviously biased
The Guardian is too
As is the Telegraph
As is the Times

etc.. etc..

If you want news "as is" then read it on Reuters.

I read biased sources. (some left wing and right wing papers) For a totally non biased source, you head to the source that all newspapers use which is Reuters.

Provide a link to demonstrate that what the Guardian said then is no longer true or your comment is meaningless.

They seemed to be doing ok last year too...

http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/feb/20/mail-online-gains-17m-unique-browsers-as-newspaper-sites-bounce-back

Your second comment is just incredibly ignorant and ill informed. Ironic since that is what you accuse the Mail readership of.

Print and online UK figures includes 3,567,000 people classified as ABC1.

http://www.newsworks.org.uk/Daily-Mail

So you're saying that builders are simpletons who can't think for themselves. Dig deeper.

Give 3 examples

Where do you follow the news then if you find this biased?

Provide a link to demonstrate that what the Guardian said then is no longer true or your comment is meaningless.

They seemed to be doing ok last year too...

http://www.theguardian.com/media/2015/feb/20/mail-online-gains-17m-unique-browsers-as-newspaper-sites-bounce-back

Your second comment is just incredibly ignorant and ill informed. Ironic since that is what you accuse the Mail readership of.

Print and online UK figures includes 3,567,000 people classified as ABC1.

http://www.newsworks.org.uk/Daily-Mail

No, find it yourself.



The independent, The economist. Sometimes the BBC. I mainly watch BBC news on TV. And Aljazeera, not fully reliable but they seem to be the only ones that report on the middle eastern crisis.

You have stated something as a fact so back it up with facts.

It also means the hatred of Islam which can be entirely justifiable.

A stupid statement.

You're hating on an entire religion because less than 0.1% of them are causing problems, that is entirely irrational.

0.1%? Have a laugh


Posted from TSR Mobile

The daily mail is constantly publishing anti refugee or anti muslim articles like this one to try and portray all muslims as barbaric savages. Despite the fact these muslims are a small minority of extreme shia (like president Assad who the mail supports), they are trying to stir up trouble against the muslim population as a whole which is why the UK is becoming such a racist uncomfortable place to be recently.

Additionally their rhetoric about the refugees has made the attitude in this country to the greatest humanitarian crisis since World war two disgusting. They generalise all refugees as rapists and Jihadis just because of a few bad apples and for some reason seem to believe that because some refugees are male they are cowards and for some reason incapable of fleeing Assads barbarity.

A combination of these two factors has made it so the UK has not had a serious response to the refugee crisis making the plight of these poor people even worse. I am fed up with this rag and think it should be banned for inciting hatred, anyone else agree?

A stupid statement.

You're hating on an entire religion because less than 0.1% of them are causing problems, that is entirely irrational.

A stupid statement.

You're hating on an entire religion because less than 0.1% of them are causing problems, that is entirely irrational.

you're right, closer to 0.0001%