Two explosions at Brussels Airport, several injured

This apologist nonsense is far more disgusting to my eyes. This idea that the actions of ISIS can be rationalised due to bigots in the west and that if we leave the middle east alone now terrorism will stop is utter nonsense. The end goal of ISIS is global conversion to Islam and death to every non-believer of their version of Islam. This is not some righteous response to western foreign policy, this is a deranged death cult.

How you can use the term race-bating when this has absolutely nothing to do with race is bemusing. I know some on the left like to bring up race as a catch-all term to shut down any argument but this is really pushing the boat out.

The fact that there are some in the West whose interpretation of Islam is a genuine threat to our society is evident. The fact that there is a huge gulf between the traditional Islamic view of the world and the enlightened western view of the world is also true. The fact that Europe's response to the refugee crisis risks aggravating that situation is also a fact.

Pointing these things out is in no way discriminatory, reactionary or reprehensible. Incidentally, those words are far more appropriate in the context of Islam.

It never ceases to amaze me how certain people on the left can be so critical of the reactionary intolerance of the hard right, and yet perfectly receptive of the far more intolerant and reactionary views of Islam. Complete cognitive dissonance.

S would you like to stop it at soyrce and be prepared to go back to a ground war with ISIS (as a start)?

If I were drafted in by the state I would go.

You didnt answer the question.

This apologist nonsense is far more disgusting to my eyes.

It never ceases to amaze me how certain people on the left can be so critical of the reactionary intolerance of the hard right, and yet perfectly receptive of the far more intolerant and reactionary views of Islam. Complete cognitive dissonance.

While you might expect more of a 50/50 gender split, his conclusion that they can't possible be refugees as they're male and are thus infact jihadists seems to be a logical leap.

Reasons might include the fact that women and children are less likely to survive the trip, men might feel that they are better able to survive the dangerous journey and it is harder to take care of a family compared to an individual.

Yes I would and like I said, if this country brought in conscription and I were called up, I would go

I must say it is rather amusing to see QE2 of all people being called out for being an apologist. It isn't a comment I often hear.

So where are the women and children? Have those most in danger been left back in the hot zone?

Posted from TSR Mobile

My question had nothing to do with conscription. We have a professional army what use would conscription be as we cant equip our current forces properly.

Yes I would and like I said, if this country brought in conscription and I were called up, I would go

We have a volunteer armed forces. You're perfectly at liberty to begin your application right now, why wait for conscription?

Then in that case, the answer is yes, very simple


I'm just proving the point that I dislike it when people are over-eager for war when it isn't them or their sons going off to die.

This apologist nonsense is far more disgusting to my eyes. This idea that the actions of ISIS can be rationalised due to bigots in the west and that if we leave the middle east alone now terrorism will stop is utter nonsense. The end goal of ISIS is global conversion to Islam and death to every non-believer of their version of Islam. This is not some righteous response to western foreign policy, this is a deranged death cult.

How you can use the term race-bating when this has absolutely nothing to do with race is bemusing. I know some on the left like to bring up race as a catch-all term to shut down any argument but this is really pushing the boat out.

The fact that there are some in the West whose interpretation of Islam is a genuine threat to our society is evident. The fact that there is a huge gulf between the traditional Islamic view of the world and the enlightened western view of the world is also true. The fact that Europe's response to the refugee crisis risks aggravating that situation is also a fact.

Pointing these things out is in no way discriminatory, reactionary or reprehensible. Incidentally, those words are far more appropriate in the context of Islam.

It never ceases to amaze me how certain people on the left can be so critical of the reactionary intolerance of the hard right, and yet perfectly receptive of the far more intolerant and reactionary views of Islam. Complete cognitive dissonance.

Not this again you think we should treat this as simply as muslims who will commit a terrorist act and the ones who won't?

You can't make such a simple divide like that. What about the millions who have similar views and even support these terrorists? They are just as important in breeding the environment which Islamic terrorism grows.

Posted from TSR Mobile

#StopIslam is now trending worldwide on Twitter.

I must say it is rather amusing to see QE2 of all people being called out for being an apologist. It isn't a comment I often hear.

Education for you