Two explosions at Brussels Airport, several injured

You've done exactly the same on this thread.

I don't ever recall claiming that you wanted to ban Islam.

And no, throwing 'random quotes' around isn't pointless - I just showed you that Islam condemns killing, and you ignore it. The Quoran, to which 1.5 billion Muslims ascribe, condemns killing. Yet you tell me some **** about how it's 'contradictory' - I don't see any contradictions here. The Quoran right here says what it says. Don't try to wriggle your way out of this one.

And to be honest, I find it hilarious that you're backing up with this excuse of you 'criticising Islam' when Islam, according to the sources you and others have spammed at me, is actually more moderate than some of the Muslims who follow it.

And you still won't accept that ISIS does not represent the Islam that 1.5 billion Muslims subscribe to. ISIS purports a warped version of Islam.

If you're going to butt into this conversation and make false claims, at least read it from its entirety.

No, I'm defending the 1.5 billion peaceful Muslims. Not ISIS.

It's a shame right-wing toolboxes like yourself can't tell the difference.

Are you seriously saying that mariachi believes the majority of Muslims support ISIS and their interpretations...?

No, I'm defending the 1.5 billion peaceful Muslims. Not ISIS.

It's a shame right-wing toolboxes like yourself can't tell the difference.

I'm a life long Lefty Frank

Your attempts at labeling me 'right-wing' are quite funny really but your undermining of us on the left in such a way should be considered abhorrent in the extreme.

so, you seem to really think that "truth" depends from statistics. What x number of Muslims claim is "truth", because they are more numerous than y number claiming the opposite (please, fill in whatever number is supplied by your statistics)

thank you for this interesting personal remark, to which I will attribute all the importance it deserves

best

I never denied that the majority of Muslims reject ISIS and their interpretations ; however

-we do not know which percentage exactly, and which interpretations exactly are rejected (it's not a black/white issue)

-statistics have nothing to do with "truth" and are not of much help in deciding who is right and who is wrong

so, as far as we Kuffar are concerned, we are back at the starting point, at least with regard to "true" Islam

this does not mean that we will not sympathize with, and assist "moderate" Muslims

best

Pretend to be whoever you want, but your anti-Islamic views are nationalistic, isolationist and therefore right-wing.

No my anti Islamic views are because I abhor sexism, parochialism , patriarchy and homophobia.

all part of Islam hence why some of us on the left consider Islam a curse on humanity

But Given I've actually fought against the far right (and not just a few words on a forum) I find you calling me 'far-right' a joke and a slap in the face

but then for you it's just about protecting Islam and not about what we on the left consider to be 'right' otherwise you wouldn't be trying to play down the threat of Islam

He continuously refuses to deny it so yes.

I never denied that the majority of Muslims reject ISIS and their interpretations

He continuously refuses to deny it so yes.

That's the source of your anti-Islamic views.

Your anti-Islamic views which result from your abhorrence from sexism, homophobia, etc are nationalistic and isolationist and therefore right wing.

That's the source of your anti-Islamic views.

Your anti-Islamic views which result from your abhorrence from sexism, homophobia, etc are nationalistic and isolationist and therefore right wing.

... Hope this helps

Frank, why don't you read posts ?

http://www.thestudentroom.co.uk/showpost.php?p=63601755&postcount=1012

I am reading them, if your question is 'why do you ignore them' its because they're lying.

Oh look, the classic putting words in my mouth. Freaking hell, I'm done with you. You are a thick-skulled idiot, don't reply to anything I have to say, you have shown yourself to be an incompetent discusser.