Why don't we just convert to Islam?

Scroll to see replies

Reply 100

HotFlash

Original post by luminarychild

so what will you do?

Get shredded.

Reply 101

luminarychild

Original post by HotFlash

Get shredded.

Hows that gonna help? :lolwut:

Reply 102

HotFlash

Original post by luminarychild

Hows that gonna help? :lolwut:

Because the terrorists will see how shredded I have become and realise that life is not about fighting for your religion but it's about getting shredded.

Reply 103

luminarychild

Original post by HotFlash

Because the terrorists will see how shredded I have become and realise that life is not about fighting for your religion but it's about getting shredded.

Reply 104

HotFlash

Original post by luminarychild

Worship Zyzz not Allah. Zyzz only wants peace and for everyone to be shredded.

Reply 105

JC.

Original post by luminarychild

SO many non muslim pedos in this day and age and since the start of time *sigh*

Just look at Adam johnson recently

We don't worship or glorify any of those either...

Reply 106

luminarychild

Original post by JC.

We don't worship or glorify any of those either...

Neither do we, we worship Allah not the prophet pbuh

Yet you let these people walk free and act like they're your own

Reply 107

JC.

Original post by luminarychild

Neither do we, we worship Allah not the prophet pbuh

Yet you let these people walk free and act like they're your own

You're deflecting. We're talking specifically about islam and its pedo prophet.

I don't want anything to do with him, islams abhorrent practices or islams magic man. Thats why I won't be indoctrinated into islam or any other crack pot religion.

Reply 108

chemting

Original post by leavingthecity

Someone who uses the word 'feminise' in an attempt to be derogatory in 2016 is not worth any attention

Depends what you mean by "feminise" though, if its genuine concerns for women then I agree... but if its some Tumblr Anita Sarkeesian crap (e.g. sexism in video games), then maybe not.

Edit: if you're talking about him, then he is trying to brand fighting for equal rights as derogatory (because Jesus!) so I guess yeah.

Posted from TSR Mobile

(edited 8 years ago)

Reply 109

Amina.S16

Original post by King Scorchy

It would make everyone stop fighting, and then we can get on with things.
CONVERT OR DIE SCUM!

But ISIS mainly kill Muslims 😕

Reply 110

Amina.S16

Original post by hxfsxh

How about people stop hating against Islam, and focus their hate on the people killing in the name of Islam, instead?

Finally someone said it 👏🏾

Reply 111

username2385417

Original post by chemting

I'm pretty sure you are overestimating his awareness of the world around him and it's progression.

I think he is referring to the acceptance of women into government and Christian organisations and/or the resulting change in how they operate as they have modernised ie recognised women.

Since joining TSR I've noticed that most students experiences of feminism and women's rights come from purely cerebral debate and are often informed by these....Tumblr nobodies.

When they graduate into the real world, many will notice, most women will notice, that all kinds of residual inequality still exist in our society and needs to be taken seriously. Now, I don't play video games, but I have previously worked in financial markets trading technology where none of the women were expected or believed to have any understanding of how the technology worked. Such things exist and for this guy to dismiss the progression of women toward being equal with men in our society in using 'feminise' only tells us of his historical, social and corporate world ignorance.

Reply 112

username2385417

Original post by Amina.S16

Finally someone said it 👏🏾

You need to allow us to ask WHY though.

If you mean people should not hate Muslims who are a diverse group of people, I agree.

Reply 113

JC.

Original post by luminarychild

You're point is irrelevant! He was not a pedo and nor can you prove it

Go piss off and have a **** in your v8 fatty

The actions of a prophet are supposed to transcend the boundaries of time. Citing that it was OK when the holy mo was alive means he's not a prophet - just some dirty cave dweller having his way with a child.
So, if you want to argue that the holy mo is a prophet you have to accept that he is both a prophet AND a dirty pedo. The more likely conclusion is he's not a prophet - just some dirty old man getting his rocks off cave-man style.

Point proven.

p.s The first person to start name calling loses the argument.

Myanmar is why

The age of consent in England used to be 12, does that mean all english people are descendants of pedos? It was accepted at the time. When did he ever rape her? please provide proof
Also people used to sell/giveaway their daughters in england not that long ago too (after Islam was revealed obviously) and they were at a young age (14) to old english men. Sick
Look at king John of england

Reply 116

chemting

Original post by luminarychild

"It was accepted at the time" is the worst excuse ever. The prophet is supposed to be timeless, "ahead of his time" progressive, a bastion of morality for all of time. He wasn't supposed to have been influenced by culture and time, unless you admit he wasn't the "apostle of allah", just another fallible Arab who achieved things politically?

People don't take 16th century England as a basis for all morality & way of life, and King John as the most perfect person to have ever lived. Muslims do.

Posted from TSR Mobile

Reply 117

JC.

Original post by luminarychild

So you lost then? as you proceeded to call the prophet a pedo and are doing so once again and on top of that you cannot justify this you just extend on a lie with your sick imagination. Wouldn't be surprised if you touched kids too.

Please explain the dirty non muslim pedos in society today and the pope? the english pedos today reflect on the society we dwell in and the members in it like you.

I've proved the holy mo is a disgusting individual with logic - something those with religion addled brains cannot get their minds around.

All religion is nonsense. Islam just happens to be particularly abhorrent, but you'd like to deflect the discussion onto other religions to disguise the fact that the poster child for islam is a scumbag.

If you want to pray to a dirty cave dweller and an imaginary magic sky man, you rock on. Those of us with a brain between our ears have worked out religion is just a convenient man-made means to controll the vulnerable and those with a weak mind.

Reply 118

41b

Original post by hellodave5

I'm not so sure I understand entirely what you mean; I don't think I agree with what you said as far as I understood it. Though I appreciate the effort of the post.

Care to explain what you mean further, and with reference to those countries/ideologies (France, Nazi's, USSR, and USA)?

Cheers

Thanks for your reply.

As a matter of broad explanation:

Royalist France was aristocratic, highly inegalitarian and religious in the 18th century. It was also the strongest country in Europe, at many points taking on everyone else. The legacy of Royalism meant that Napoleonic France was able to dominate all of Europe for a short time. Royalist France could have done so too, but kings are too wise to expend their nation's wealth for unnecessary and counterproductive wars of personal glory (unlike petty corporals). The aftermath of the revolution saw an irreversible egalitarian malaise set in, which culminated in the election of socialists in the 30s and the defeat to the Nazis.

Russian history followed the same story.

This video should give you a good starting point, if you are interested:

www.youtube.com/watch?v=tFyIzoBwXVk

Reply 119

hellodave5

Original post by 41b

I have to say I strongly disagree with the notion that the video suggests, and I'm not sure there is any credible basis for what is suggested that I can think of.

I feel that what I heard in the video was rather abhorrent and unfounded, putting a face of credibility on something which has none - particularly by citing sparsely related studies and a single professor without giving citation.
This doesn't allow the viewer to evaluate them to check that findings haven't been twisted or even just invented (like politicians often like to do).
Seemed also to be somewhat emotive at points, despite trying to appear unbiased and 'collected'.

It seems that the viewpoint is based primarily on a fear of a takeover, particularly from Islam.
But interestingly, that video suggests that we should give up our free society, and become somewhat like a strict Islamic society; in other words, if you can't beat them, join them. To me, this doesn't make sense at all.

Though I don't agree with it from what I have seen; it is an interesting notion that more egalitarian societies become in some way, militarily, and perhaps even culturally weaker. Something that I have not considered before.

Of course, if one is to instantly shoot down and fail to consider everything that is disagreed with, then no one would learn anything... so I appreciate the discussion!

P.S. Just an observation of the other videos of that poster (Thought Police and Political Correctness) says that for there to be quality of life there must be freedom; which I sort of feel goes against that one I watched prior which suggested less freedom and participation in society of women.