A scenario that will stretch your moral boundaries.

He stated 4 and 6. 4 is below nursery O.o and 6 is year 1. Bit weird with him saying that they doing well academically.

1 factor isn't enough to make me a bad person because it doesn't carry enough weight of "wrongness" i.e. doing drugs and wasting time are both wrong but which one is "wronger"? well doing drugs is obviously worse than wasting time.

thing is the girl in uni knows what is right and still chooses to do drugs which isn't something i'd look up to but she has the choice to do what she wants but she's fully capable and knows what she does.
the guy however doesn't really know right from wrong and hasn't developed a sense of morality because all he knows in his earlier life is abuse and pain so he'll do that to others so it make him feel better at the end of the day.

i'm not fighting my argument on the grounds of what is worse i'm fighting on who is not as wrong as the others.

1 factor isn't enough to make me a bad person because it doesn't carry enough weight of "wrongness" i.e. doing drugs and wasting time are both wrong but which one is "wronger"? well doing drugs is obviously worse than wasting time.

Why? You can't just state that one is more wrong without any explanation lmfao.

Are you serious?

You're saying he doesn't know that beating up his pregnant girlfriend is wrong?

Why is doing drugs wrong?

you seriously don't get it do you?
he does know it's wrong however he's less(let's say responsible for his actions) compared to others. i'm applying justice while you're applying equality
what i'm trying to say by saving john here is that so he gets an equal opportunity just like everyone else, he needs the most help compared to others that's why i've picked him, the others all have had a chance but there's someone worse off than them.

The others are doing far more trivial crimes though. Beating up your pregnant girlfriend is FAR worse than taking drugs. If John and Sally were both drug addicts, I'd agree with you that John is less at fault.

Also are you not thinking of Johns girlfriend and unborn child who will suffer more as a result of John being alive.

Sally's not going anywhere in life due to her drug problems, has no children and doesn't speak to her family anyway.


Sukhdev has two young children and is a hard working business man. Looks like some dodgy fraudulent behaviour is involved there, but what business isn't that true of? He's clearly a hard worker as he spends so much of his time away from home. His wife has been diagnosed with depression and his death could tip her over the damage and be hugely detrimental to their children. I don't get the relevance of not supporting Lucy, just because he had sex with her doesn't mean he has any obligations to find her a ****ing house several months later.


Whilst I empathise with John's childhood troubles, that's not an excuse for him to assault his pregnant gf. He's an utter **** that is contributing nothing to society but violence and misery. Although his gf is pregnant, even if the baby survives his assault it is extremely unlikely that he would have anything positive to contribute to his/her life anyway.


Therefore, I would save Sukhdev.

But how would you truely choose at random? Throw a die?

seriously? drugs you waste your life and body
time you waste life that's it
drugs are much harder to come off compared to stop time wasting

drugs give a massive amount of pleasure, why is that time wasting so much worse than the time wasting of spending hours on TSR?
hard to come off maybe but not necessarily.

then a huge down.
just like coffee does with the caffeine in it. you have to keep drinking and consuming the caffeine in it to come back to the level you were before.
wasting time has neative affects no where near as serious as drugs

it doesn't say she's addicted and many many people use heroin without becoming addicted. this doesn't make them bad people nor is it the most dangerous thing in the world.

So killing 6 millions Jews doesn't make Adolf Hitler a bad person?

ok mate...