Will they steal the election from Trump?

Popularity? Do you even bother to look at polling? He's popular with one wing of the Republican Party. He's despised by all democrats and many Republicans, and disliked by moderate independents. His favourability ratings are substantially less than Hilary Clinton.

Just making moronic assertions that are not backed up by data or any actual experience of American politics doesn't move the debate forward, it simply makes you look like every other dilettante who thinks that following the presidential nominations for a couple of months actually means he has insight or something valuable to say on the subject.

Trump is far less rich than he claims, and the wealth he does have is in assets, no cash in the bank. President Obama raised more than $1 billion in donations to fight the 2012 election. This cycle Clinton has already raised $110 million.


Trump has only raised $25 million, and in fact about that amount of money has been raised by conservative super-PACs whose sole purpose is to oppose Trump.

He'll go into the general with far less money than Clinton, with many Republicans extremely unenthused about him (and many of those most likely to support him don't even bother to vote in elections anyway). Against him he will face in Clinton a candidate with a lot of experience in presidential elections, who will be sitting on a $1 billion election warchest and leading an extremely fired-up Democratic Party which is determined to beat Trump. He'll be lucky to lose 45/55 to Clinton

Nah. Republican donors despise him, many of them whose business interests rely on international trade would rather let Hilary win. Many Republican donors who are interested in foreign policy issues are loathe to see Trump ruin the United States' foreign policy and relations. Moderate Republicans would rather Hilary win.

How can he win if these groups were against him?

Exactly. He can't win, so the Republicans probably won't nominate him, because they want someone who can actually win.

No it isn't broken, democracy exists to be fair not to give you what you want all of the time. If you think right-wingers don't deserve representation then maybe you should advocate for exemption of tax for us.

But it isn't fair because, frankly, most of the people voting are too utterly stupid to decide what's best for themselves and their country.

Yes but left-wingers also pay tax that's why we give them the vote. Go live in Sweden if you want to be raped by migrants.

The majority of republican voters want him as President

Yep, because rape never happened before migrants came to Sweden.

And the German economy was great before the Jews came.

Rape did not happen nearly to the extent than after the migrants arrived. We both know that to be true so drop the phony act.

The man has alienated the latinos, the blacks, the Mormons, the gays, the women, and the list goes on. He has stolen the election from himself, if anything. If the other Republicans don't want him nominated as Republican presidential candidate, I can completely understand that - they want a candidate that stands a chance of winning.

how exactly?be specific(especially regarding the mormons one)

It is common knowledge that the man is racist, and blacks do not like that. He's obviously a sexist, based on his many sexist remarks - he seems to go out of his way to insult women. Finally, Mormons believe very strongly in religious freedom. Based on the way Trump treats Muslims, the Mormons have decided almost monolithically not to vote for him.

Do you actually have any statistics to back this up?

Bernie is not electable as President. He's great but he would never win in America.

He's known for gaining huge support for saying what he wants, if that's not electable I don't know what is.

This is an interesting view, and seems to be commonly held. But how do you explain Sanders doing much better than Hillary with independents and in all hypothetical general election voting?

Trump is far less rich than he claims, and the wealth he does have is in assets, no cash in the bank. President Obama raised more than $1 billion in donations to fight the 2012 election. This cycle Clinton has already raised $110 million.

Trump has only raised $25 million, and in fact about that amount of money has been raised by conservative super-PACs whose sole purpose is to oppose Trump.

He'll go into the general with far less money than Clinton, with many Republicans extremely unenthused about him (and many of those most likely to support him don't even bother to vote in elections anyway). Against him he will face in Clinton a candidate with a lot of experience in presidential elections, who will be sitting on a $1 billion election warchest and leading an extremely fired-up Democratic Party which is determined to beat Trump. He'll be lucky to lose 45/55 to Clinton

My point is he would lose to Trump and because he does well with two groups doesn't mean he's the most electable candidate for the Democrats. Think about it. The Republicans who don't want Trump are likely to compromise for Clinton but would never go for someone as far left as Bernie.

Debatable but alright, i can see how you'd think that if you lean left socially.
But what's that about mormons? Trump isn't ranking poorly in utah last i checked...? Can you maybe provide evidence of some official statement straight out of salt lake that urges the lds to shun him?

My point is he would lose to Trump and because he does well with two groups doesn't mean he's the most electable candidate for the Democrats. Think about it. The Republicans who don't want Trump are likely to compromise for Clinton but would never go for someone as far left as Bernie.