You think a student is a troll for questioning the integrity of the knowledge been presented to him?
You're not just 'questionng the integrity of the knowledge presented' though, are you? You're trying to convince everyone that what you're saying is correct, being rude and obnoxious when people disagree, failing to explain yourself clearly and, perhaps most irritatingly, talking authoritatively about things when you self-confessedly don't actually know what you are saying! k=0, anyone?
Given that most of this thread is you trying to 'explain' things to others, the student analogy works rather more effectively against you than for you!
Yes of course I do, between two bodies is a rate of exchange, this rate is constant, (gravity) , and the entropy of E swaps from one body to an other depending of equilibrium state of the body, an object in an inertia accelerating reference frame is under the constant force of gravity at rest mass equal to rest mass and newtons of force. The rate of the Caesium atom is the rate of exchange of entropy, something that gains loses to retain equilibrium, what you mistake for a time dilation is a timing dilation , by accelerating the clock you are effectively de-accelerating the inertia accelerated reference frame extraction of entropy.
Yes of course I do, between two bodies is a rate of exchange, this rate is constant, (gravity) , and the entropy of E swaps from one body to an other depending of equilibrium state of the body, an object in an inertia accelerating reference frame is under the constant force of gravity at rest mass equal to rest mass and newtons of force. The rate of the Caesium atom is the rate of exchange of entropy, something that gains loses to retain equilibrium, what you mistake for a time dilation is a timing dilation , by accelerating the clock you are effectively de-accelerating the inertia accelerated reference frame extraction of entropy.
Firstly, do you agree with the point I made earlier? About the light appearing to move diagonally?
And do you also agree that the speed of light is the same for EVERY observer?
I never said you did, so ironically the main piece of evidence for time dilation is not even related to time. So apparently it is of the imagination and there is not an actual time dilation of any degree.
Simultaneity is apparently imagination with no fact.
I never said you did, so ironically the main piece of evidence for time dilation is not even related to time. So apparently it is of the imagination and there is not an actual time dilation of any degree.
Simultaneity is apparently imagination with no fact.
The fact is beams of light ARE possible, and we are using one for the purpose of this experiment
The fact is a beam of light needs a medium such as smoke to be seen, the fact is beams of light is observe effect, the light off the sun is isotropic and it is a fact it is not opaque.
no it does not move diagonally which can be easily proven and i have already shown.
NO, it can be measured differently on a different planet by present standards contradiction.
Am going to unfollow this thread as your lack of abililty to think about basic concepts bewilders me, but good luck disproving all of the work on relativity for the past 100 or so years anyway